Goddam you people are so irritating. An objectively cool thing is happening that most of us have never seen before. 250,000 miles from earth. Reaching speeds of 24,500 mph. Slingshotting around that little ball in the night sky. Take a break from being miserable pricks for five seconds and just appreciate it.
Nice to see nobody got hurt. Lots of people received good pay for their time. $4 billion spent on a joyride through a lifeless void. Genesis projection for a dead planetary body is just a fantasy. Such technology and expense would be better spent cleaning up pollution at home.
Nice to see nobody got hurt. Lots of people received good pay for their time. $4 billion spent on a joyride through a lifeless void. Genesis projection for a dead planetary body is just a fantasy. Such technology and expense would be better spent cleaning up pollution at home.
So you're saying we need to work on Project Genesis?
Electrical enginering degree with PMP certification. Over 25 years in wireless telecom construction.
So many touchy people on this that truly believe it’s all real. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Surely our adversaries will provide evidence this is fake to knock down US prestige!
Exactly. The Moon landing back in 1969 was at the pinnacle of US/Russia technological rivalry and the Cold War. If the US had faked it Russia would have been the first to notify the world. People who claim it never happened always latch onto scraps of so called “evidence” to support their beliefs, which can all be explained away through basic science and yet they completely ignore all the scientific facts, data and tens of thousands of scientists involved in the Moon program.
If the US had faked it Russia would have been the first to notify the world.
And they would have the evidence, too. I'm sure they were tracking it. We were tracking them.
I was at the Smithsonian Air&Space Museum a few years ago and was surprised to see a spacesuit worn by Yuri Gagarin. The posted narrative was interesting. The Soviets did not announce anything to the world about his trip into space until he returned alive, wanting to avoid the bad press if he died. However, the US new EVERYTHING about his trip in real time. We were intercepting all transmissions - auditory communications, vital signs, etc. We knew his heart rate, breathing rate, and heard every communication between him and the ground. Eisenhower was in the Oval Office getting minute by minute updates of the mission.
Margaret Elaine Hamilton (née Heafield; born August 17, 1936) is an American computer scientist. She directed the Software Engineering Division at the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory, where she led the development of the on-bo...
Surely our adversaries will provide evidence this is fake to knock down US prestige!
Exactly. The Moon landing back in 1969 was at the pinnacle of US/Russia technological rivalry and the Cold War. If the US had faked it Russia would have been the first to notify the world. People who claim it never happened always latch onto scraps of so called “evidence” to support their beliefs, which can all be explained away through basic science and yet they completely ignore all the scientific facts, data and tens of thousands of scientists involved in the Moon program.
But honest question - what is your evidence it happened back in '69 and the early 70's?
Because on the flipside the simple reality is hat you don't have anything other than NASA telling you they did it (which at a guess they might have a vested interest in themselves being successful, no?), and what they provided could be seen as "scraps of evidence" at best. You have no more evidence than anyone else does and everyone is entitled to their own interpretation.
And sorry, a bunch pictures and film footage - some of it quite comical to be honest (go look at the "moonbuggy" footage which hasn't stood the test of time well because it's clearly a rigid doll strapped to a remote control car), isn't firm evidence at all. It's evidence originating from only one non-objective party whether you want to accept that reality or not. Same as Nixon having his real-time, delay-less phone call with the moon on a rotary dial phone, 240'000 miles away back in 1969 when cellular technology was literally decades away. Same as the "lunar takeoff" footage which has been and can be debunked by any filmographer worth their salt, because there is no way that a 1960's Westinghouse camera on a tripod could be remotely controlled from 240'000 miles away by some guy in Houston to smoothly capture a panning takeoff shot and simultaneously zoom in on it as Neil and the boys made their triumphant getaway.
Even now, the reality is that NASA could tell us anything. I personally don't see any misdirection now, but this is a possibility. I'll also say this, if you think what we are seeing now validates the legitimacy of something that happened 56 odd years ago, when the world was very very different, especially in terms of technology and technological advancement, I think you are making a laughably weak case.
Exactly. The Moon landing back in 1969 was at the pinnacle of US/Russia technological rivalry and the Cold War. If the US had faked it Russia would have been the first to notify the world. People who claim it never happened always latch onto scraps of so called “evidence” to support their beliefs, which can all be explained away through basic science and yet they completely ignore all the scientific facts, data and tens of thousands of scientists involved in the Moon program.
But honest question - what is your evidence it happened back in '69 and the early 70's?
Because on the flipside the simple reality is hat you don't have anything other than NASA telling you they did it (which at a guess they might have a vested interest in themselves being successful, no?), and what they provided could be seen as "scraps of evidence" at best. You have no more evidence than anyone else does and everyone is entitled to their own interpretation.
And sorry, a bunch pictures and film footage - some of it quite comical to be honest (go look at the "moonbuggy" footage which hasn't stood the test of time well because it's clearly a rigid doll strapped to a remote control car), isn't firm evidence at all. It's evidence originating from only one non-objective party whether you want to accept that reality or not. Same as Nixon having his real-time, delay-less phone call with the moon on a rotary dial phone, 240'000 miles away back in 1969 when cellular technology was literally decades away. Same as the "lunar takeoff" footage which has been and can be debunked by any filmographer worth their salt, because there is no way that a 1960's Westinghouse camera on a tripod could be remotely controlled from 240'000 miles away by some guy in Houston to smoothly capture a panning takeoff shot and simultaneously zoom in on it as Neil and the boys made their triumphant getaway.
Even now, the reality is that NASA could tell us anything. I personally don't see any misdirection now, but this is a possibility. I'll also say this, if you think what we are seeing now validates the legitimacy of something that happened 56 odd years ago, when the world was very very different, especially in terms of technology and technological advancement, I think you are making a laughably weak case.
NASA and every other space agency / government in the world. Many of whom have vested interest in lowering American scitech hegemony...
But honest question - what is your evidence it happened back in '69 and the early 70's?
Because on the flipside the simple reality is hat you don't have anything other than NASA telling you they did it (which at a guess they might have a vested interest in themselves being successful, no?), and what they provided could be seen as "scraps of evidence" at best. You have no more evidence than anyone else does and everyone is entitled to their own interpretation.
And sorry, a bunch pictures and film footage - some of it quite comical to be honest (go look at the "moonbuggy" footage which hasn't stood the test of time well because it's clearly a rigid doll strapped to a remote control car), isn't firm evidence at all. It's evidence originating from only one non-objective party whether you want to accept that reality or not. Same as Nixon having his real-time, delay-less phone call with the moon on a rotary dial phone, 240'000 miles away back in 1969 when cellular technology was literally decades away. Same as the "lunar takeoff" footage which has been and can be debunked by any filmographer worth their salt, because there is no way that a 1960's Westinghouse camera on a tripod could be remotely controlled from 240'000 miles away by some guy in Houston to smoothly capture a panning takeoff shot and simultaneously zoom in on it as Neil and the boys made their triumphant getaway.
Even now, the reality is that NASA could tell us anything. I personally don't see any misdirection now, but this is a possibility. I'll also say this, if you think what we are seeing now validates the legitimacy of something that happened 56 odd years ago, when the world was very very different, especially in terms of technology and technological advancement, I think you are making a laughably weak case.
You're obviously watching the conspiracy theory videos. The evidence you seek is in the videos by people who have a good understanding of physics and enjoy debunking the real nonsense.
Third-party evidence for the Apollo Moon landings is evidence or analysis of evidence about the Apollo Moon landings that does not come from the U.S. government (the first party) or from Moon landing hoax theorists (the secon...
