KingOfTheJungle1 wrote:
Experience by itself does not mean you are a good coach. It just means you have been around a long time. There are plenty of NCAA coaches with decades on the résumé and absolutely nothing to show for it in terms of athlete development or program growth. Hanging onto a job because you have paid your dues while importing one or two already elite Kenyan kids from overseas every year is not coaching, it is roster management. If experience automatically equaled competence, we would not see so many stagnant programs doing the same thing year after year. Schools should be hiring based on results, how athletes actually improve and how teams progress, not how long someone has been collecting a paycheck.
Note I said “merit” and experience. So you’re experienced with great results. You don’t need to be bringing in Kenyans or have all Americans or even conference medalist to be a successful coach. You may be in a Situation like mines where I don’t have money but develop 20 min HS girls into 17/18 min girls with the occasional mid 16 girl every few years. we are mid pack but this has been the past 10 years with a couple top 3 finishes for a program with no money. It’s not a horn toot I’m really just saying I see other guys doing those things or even better and ask me why they aren’t getting head jobs and I can’t really help them as the hiring process is very biased. I’m blessed to be where I’m at I love it.
