“I’m sorry for saying the shooter was MAGA. He was not. He was of the left. I apologize to the Kirk family for lying. Please accept my sincere apology. I will do better. I was wrong.”
He didn’t say the shooter was MAGA. Read his quote again. It’s also incorrect to say he was “of the left” other than left of his Trump-supporting family.
People can’t see the nuance in all of this, but I guess you don’t get the same amount of outrage then.
Anyway, if you don’t like him, then don’t watch. If his ratings are terrible, he will get taken off soon enough. Free markets!
They can't see nuance because they don't want to. Tyler Livingston wasn't MAGA... but more than anything he was just a random 22 year old Mormon kid from Utah. That is mostly what he is. Even Trump's corrupt DOJ said they couldn't find that he was part of any left leaning organizations.
A social media influencer and podcasts for shoot. Traffic for sure but not more or less traffic than every other gun death in this country. Kirk is being given out weighted coverage.
But he did say the shooter was MAGA. Read again what he said.
You post a lot on here and I want to understand for that reason.
Can you comprehend that Kimmel did not specifically indicate that he believed that the shooter was Maga? Can you comprehend that Kimmel was saying that his base was trying very hard to prove that he was not part of Maga? Do you see the difference between these two? Can you understand that Kimmel was saying that the shooters affiliation is unknown, but what is known is that the shooters base if going to great lengths to say he was not Maga?
That is the crux of the matter, and this thing has been discussed at length.
I am not sure you understand the difference in these two positions.
I can't figure out if Sally is trolling or she really doesn't understand this distinction.
It seems obvious, but Sally and millions of other people don't actually understand what Kimmel actually said vs. what they think he said. It's bizarre.
1) Kimmel initially being cancelled was not a good thing on any level.
2) Guys like Kimmel or Colbert aren't even remotely witty or funny and every time they open their yaps on political issues they end up doing more harm than good by somehow thinking that making fun of the "other side" is going to what, "shame them into changing their POVs and opinions" and uniting this stupidly divided nation? F-those guys, they suck.
The irony of course is that with Kimmel, he came to prominence and made his name with one of the most childish, misogynistic and lame shows ever - the "Man Show" that he did with that clown Carolla - you know the one where they had women jump on trampolines and look up their skirts and giggle at their bouncing jugs etc etc. Yeah - a hero of the righteous liberal and their values, that's for sure.
NEXSTAR and Sinclair stations will not air Kimmel’s show, so that’s a third of stations/revenue gone for now. The head bolsheviks at ABC are threatening to sue but how long will this publicity stunt and temporary ratings boost last? When Kimmel’s inevitable ratings slide begins again, and it will, are the mensheviks at ABC going to blame Trump instead of the increasingly sh*tty product(s) they provide? It’ll be interesting for sure.
That is because Nexstar and Sinclair have a pending 6 billion dollar merger that requires FCC approval. So yes, they can easily blame Trump in a lawsuit.
NEXSTAR and Sinclair stations will not air Kimmel’s show, so that’s a third of stations/revenue gone for now. The head bolsheviks at ABC are threatening to sue but how long will this publicity stunt and temporary ratings boost last? When Kimmel’s inevitable ratings slide begins again, and it will, are the mensheviks at ABC going to blame Trump instead of the increasingly sh*tty product(s) they provide? It’ll be interesting for sure.
Wait, are the Bolsheviks now the ones who oppose government control of the media? I thought Bolsheviks had traditionally supported that.
You post a lot on here and I want to understand for that reason.
Can you comprehend that Kimmel did not specifically indicate that he believed that the shooter was Maga? Can you comprehend that Kimmel was saying that his base was trying very hard to prove that he was not part of Maga? Do you see the difference between these two? Can you understand that Kimmel was saying that the shooters affiliation is unknown, but what is known is that the shooters base if going to great lengths to say he was not Maga?
That is the crux of the matter, and this thing has been discussed at length.
I am not sure you understand the difference in these two positions.
I can't figure out if Sally is trolling or she really doesn't understand this distinction.
It seems obvious, but Sally and millions of other people don't actually understand what Kimmel actually said vs. what they think he said. It's bizarre.
Amateur pilpul. NLP 101 in all these threads. Kimmel said what he said and he’s nothing more than a snarky weaselish useful idiot for the bolsheviks.
You post a lot on here and I want to understand for that reason.
Can you comprehend that Kimmel did not specifically indicate that he believed that the shooter was Maga? Can you comprehend that Kimmel was saying that his base was trying very hard to prove that he was not part of Maga? Do you see the difference between these two? Can you understand that Kimmel was saying that the shooters affiliation is unknown, but what is known is that the shooters base if going to great lengths to say he was not Maga?
That is the crux of the matter, and this thing has been discussed at length.
I am not sure you understand the difference in these two positions.
I can't figure out if Sally is trolling or she really doesn't understand this distinction.
It seems obvious, but Sally and millions of other people don't actually understand what Kimmel actually said vs. what they think he said. It's bizarre.
Here is your answer:
Sally has not bothered to respond, but has posted on other threads since this question to him/her was raised.
Sally is a prolific poster and it is extremely unlikely that Sally overlooked it.
I would offer that this leads us to two conclusions: that Sally does not want to directly confront his/her/their misleading statements because it lays bare their lack of integrity, and second, that Sally has something to protect in so doing.
For those reasons, I believe that Sally is a sponsored troll.
That is the most reasonable explanation. And I believe that based on how often this poster posts poorly reasoned, provocative assertions, geared to solicit a reaction and a response.
Sally doesn't care that their statements are true or not, and that is secondary to simply annoying the opposition.
He continues lying about the Charlie Kirk assassination. He rails against Trump for most of his show. Never making an attempt to smooth things over with Trump. Just a bunch of unfunny jokes and more lies.
If it is that bad, then don't watch.
It’s worse than you think.
he mislead the public with his television audience.
he lied.
Alex jones was prosecuted for lying about Sandy Hook. How is this any different?
He didn’t say the shooter was MAGA. Read his quote again. It’s also incorrect to say he was “of the left” other than left of his Trump-supporting family.
People can’t see the nuance in all of this, but I guess you don’t get the same amount of outrage then.
Anyway, if you don’t like him, then don’t watch. If his ratings are terrible, he will get taken off soon enough. Free markets!
They can't see nuance because they don't want to. Tyler Livingston wasn't MAGA... but more than anything he was just a random 22 year old Mormon kid from Utah. That is mostly what he is. Even Trump's corrupt DOJ said they couldn't find that he was part of any left leaning organizations.
They can't see nuance because they don't want to. Tyler Livingston wasn't MAGA... but more than anything he was just a random 22 year old Mormon kid from Utah. That is mostly what he is. Even Trump's corrupt DOJ said they couldn't find that he was part of any left leaning organizations.
He was pro trans…
In your world not hating trans people = pro trans.
I don't have time to watch him so I don't know if he's funny or not. If he sucks, let ABC lose money or get rid of him. I don't really care but keep the FCC out of it.