Whether you like it or not (and I can tell that many of you don’t like it), Mary Cain’s story is a really important story in US distance running.
I WILL absolutely be purchasing and reading her book. It’s a fascinating story about the reality of being a distance running prodigy, and then being exploited by a broken system that exploits tons of other (mostly female) athletes.
I want to address a few things from previous posters, namely, people who are so frustrated that she didn’t just cave to the narrative that was slapped on her, the one that paints her as a girl who was once fast but hit puberty and slowed down, and graciously disappeared from view.
Mary Cain didn’t have the mentality or the work ethic of an elite athlete: Can you provide concrete evidence of this? Where is the evidence? Give me stories, quotes, anything. Mary was a professional athlete before she graduated from high school and she was a very successful one. She did it all while being a straight A student. Currently she’s at Stanford Medical School and published a memoir at the same time. I don’t have any insights into her work ethic as I don’t know her, but from the outside, it doesn’t seem like she is exactly a couch potato.
Mary Cain is an attention seeker: When Mary went public, she said multiple times she wasn’t expecting much, just a chance to reclaim her story. Her story went VIRAL. It wasn’t just the running world. She was given every opportunity, every chance to become a full blown influencer. She could have turned her instagram page into a shrine for all things Mary, capitalizing on every trend, and amassing followers. Instead she kept a relatively low social media profile, stuck to the advocacy she was trying to do rather than make every moment about her.
People gripe on Atalanta, and I also think that the project was not well executed or thought out. But I don’t think Atalanta was an extension of her attention seeking but rather an earnest but ill concieved attempt to help make the sport better. She was like, 23-24 when she created it, so the idea tanked. Who cares?
If we want to see athletes in the sport find success, we need to learn from what happened to Mary Cain: People forget this, but Mary Cain’s talent level at the time was completely unprecedented. No other high school girl was running as fast as she was ever. And she did it without the shoes. She has articulated multiple times the way she was mistreated by Salazar told she had to lose weight and punished by being held out of a trip to Europe, even though she was in shape. The result was losing tons of weight in a matter of three months which left her bones brittle and her way more injury prone than she ever had been. There was psychological manipulation that led to depression. She was given laxatives and birth control pills to help her lose weight. None of the scrutiny was tied to performance because her performance only started tanking AFTER she was pressured to lose weight. Mary’s story opened the door for women to share how they have been pushed into losing weight without there being a concrete performance reason why. Maybe, just maybe it’s not the best thing for girls and women to focus solely on weight to run faster.
Alberto Salazar does bad things:
Not sure why everyone is so insistent that Mary Cain is a whiner, when Salazar was literally banned from coaching because it was proven that he messed with drugs and has behaved unethically. He gave his own son testosterone yall! Why are we so quick to dismiss Mary Cain when she isn’t the one who was banned from the sport!