Yes. I was her opinion that thousands of people should be burned alive, expressed while people were attempting to actually do that.
Show where thousands of people were burned alive in those hotels?
Too many? OK show where hundreds were burned alive?
Still too many? How about tens?
Still too many? How about 1 who was burned alive?
Presume there must have been loads if people across the UK were trying to do it?
Your friends found that setting buildings on fire by throwing stuff through the windows was harder than they thought. Wasn't for lack of trying though, you had a good go.
Show where thousands of people were burned alive in those hotels?
Too many? OK show where hundreds were burned alive?
Still too many? How about tens?
Still too many? How about 1 who was burned alive?
Presume there must have been loads if people across the UK were trying to do it?
Your friends found that setting buildings on fire by throwing stuff through the windows was harder than they thought. Wasn't for lack of trying though, you had a good go.
If you tweet out that all hotels housing asylum seekers should be set on fire, then you are endorsing tens of thousands being burnt alive.
It's quite simple.
No,you're exaggerating,same as all lefties do.
She said she'd be fine with it,not to set them all on fire.
And no one was burnt alive,nor was ever going to.
Still waiting on all these hotels that were burned down?
This is the worst gotcha in the world.
There were attempts to burn asylum seekers alive in hotels, and Lucy Connolly encouraged that violence by tweeting "Burn all the hotels full of the b-------s".
So if someone online advocated for your house to be set on fire with you in it and included your address, that would be absolutely fine ? You would continue to hairsplit? Suppose someone acted on that? You would maintain there was no connection between the post and the action?
So if someone online advocated for your house to be set on fire with you in it and included your address, that would be absolutely fine ? You would continue to hairsplit? Suppose someone acted on that? You would maintain there was no connection between the post and the action?
She didnt abvicate for it.
If someone said they're fine if I die,so be it,show where she listed the hotels address?
So if someone online advocated for your house to be set on fire with you in it and included your address, that would be absolutely fine ? You would continue to hairsplit? Suppose someone acted on that? You would maintain there was no connection between the post and the action?
She didnt abvicate for it.
If someone said they're fine if I die,so be it,show where she listed the hotels address?
"Set fire to his whole f—ing house full of his b——d family for all I care."
Meanwhile: someone is outside your house with petrol and a lighter.
You don't think that the tweet is encouragement to the guy with the lighter?
If someone said they're fine if I die,so be it,show where she listed the hotels address?
"Set fire to his whole f—ing house full of his b——d family for all I care."
Meanwhile: someone is outside your house with petrol and a lighter.
You don't think that the tweet is encouragement to the guy with the lighter?
If someone has gone to the effort to track down someone's house,and is standing outside with petrol and a lighter,do you really thing what someone tweets is going to make a difference?
They are already a psycho amd committed to what they are doing.
It's very interesting to me that when you watch UK based runtubers you got non of this through their videos, not even an iota. It's like they don't live there, but in some very calm, idyllic place like the Shire from LOTR or something.
I guess if they speak even a little about this they will get shadowbanned or their sponsors will drop them. Of course - very understandable. Sponsors don't want drama, they want family-friendly content. I don't expect FOD to comment here about this, either.
It's very interesting to me that when you watch UK based runtubers you got non of this through their videos, not even an iota. It's like they don't live there, but in some very calm, idyllic place like the Shire from LOTR or something.
I guess if they speak even a little about this they will get shadowbanned or their sponsors will drop them. Of course - very understandable. Sponsors don't want drama, they want family-friendly content. I don't expect FOD to comment here about this, either.
Have you stopped to think that perhaps what you hear from right wing agitators online is exaggerated, and in fact daily life in the UK tends to be pretty calm?
I live in one of the cities that had a couple of riots around the hotels and besides that one weekend, nothing much has changed. The idea that knife wielding immigrants are running roughshod around 24/7 is insane.