Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
And you are always part of such exchanges. No wonder, with your 12 year-old IQ.
The irony escapes you.
A bit like intelligence escaped you years ago.
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
And you are always part of such exchanges. No wonder, with your 12 year-old IQ.
The irony escapes you.
A bit like intelligence escaped you years ago.
the bringster wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You continue to be obsessed with what I say about subjects other than the thread, which is Jakob's last 100m being "a thing of beauty". Still nothing to say about that?
You contradict yourself so often. And you are lying, so often.
For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. Why are you so happy to see them beating Ingebrigtsen?
No. For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. I am happy to see anyone beating Ingebrigtsen. You're late for play-school.
thth wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The irony escapes you.
A bit like intelligence escaped you years ago.
Yours escaped me, that's true.
Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:
Josh Kerr voted Tory wrote:
How does he keep is head from moving at all when he runs all-out? And his arms moving the same no matter his speed.
Honestly, I think it's Jakobs first 100 that is the thing of beauty.
"Hey guys, you want to go ahead and kickstart your lactic acid production (even if ever so slightly) by sprinting off the line and running a 13.0 when you want to run a 56.5 first lap? (14.0-14.1 pace) - sure, knock yourselves out. I'll do the opposite and just run on pace from the first meters of this one".
Most of us are more interested in where a runner ends up than how they begin.
Armstronglivs wrote:
the bringster wrote:
You contradict yourself so often. And you are lying, so often.
For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. Why are you so happy to see them beating Ingebrigtsen?
No. For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. I am happy to see anyone beating Ingebrigtsen. You're late for play-school.
1 - You said Jakob is doping.
2 - You said athletes who beat dopers must be doping.
3 - Kerr and Wightman beat Jakob.
4 - you: 🤡derrrrrr I never said they are dopers!!!
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
A bit like intelligence escaped you years ago.
Yours escaped me, that's true.
I know. You are not clever enough.
thth wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
No. For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. I am happy to see anyone beating Ingebrigtsen. You're late for play-school.
1 - You said Jakob is doping.
2 - You said athletes who beat dopers must be doping.
3 - Kerr and Wightman beat Jakob.
4 - you: 🤡derrrrrr I never said they are dopers!!!
So remind me, what have you said on the thread topic?
thth wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Yours escaped me, that's true.
I know. You are not clever enough.
Dunning-Kruger identified your condition.
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
1 - You said Jakob is doping.
2 - You said athletes who beat dopers must be doping.
3 - Kerr and Wightman beat Jakob.
4 - you: 🤡derrrrrr I never said they are dopers!!!
So remind me, what have you said on the thread topic?
So remind me, you lied about what I wrote above?
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
I know. You are not clever enough.
Dunning-Kruger identified your condition.
Alois Alzheimer identified yours.
thth wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So remind me, what have you said on the thread topic?
So remind me, you lied about what I wrote above?
I haven't lied. I am simply not interested in discussing that issue on this thread and especially with an ignorant **** like you.
thth wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Dunning-Kruger identified your condition.
Alois Alzheimer identified yours.
Anyone with Alzheimer's is still ahead of you.
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
So remind me, you lied about what I wrote above?
I haven't lied. I am simply not interested in discussing that issue on this thread and especially with an ignorant **** like you.
You lied, for sure.
For you, Kerr and Wightman are dopers. They have beaten the best doped (according to you) athlete, so must have doped themself.
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
So remind me, you lied about what I wrote above?
I haven't lied. I am simply not interested in discussing that issue on this thread and especially with an ignorant **** like you.
You lied. And your insults are compliments to me. A sign of your devotion.
Armstronglivs wrote:
thth wrote:
Alois Alzheimer identified yours.
Anyone with Alzheimer's is still ahead of you.
Hahaha!!! And you're ahead how, exactly? Yeah, 30,000 posts ahead! 😂
thth wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Anyone with Alzheimer's is still ahead of you.
Hahaha!!! And you're ahead how, exactly? Yeah, 30,000 posts ahead! 😂
I can at least comment on a thread subject, something you've so far shown you're unable to do. You can't get past your fixation.