what's the frequency, Kenneth? wrote:
I don't understand the argument here. Is it that SH (not Shelby H) doesn't have to go through a trials, as do Americans, and that is somehow unfair? That is the choice that the American federation requires under the guise that it is the most FAIR process, and few disagree with that, but on the distance side (other than sprints, jumps, etc.) it isn't the optimal way to prepare if peaking/tapering for trials events is required.
Frankly, I look at it as good on the Dutch for allowing her to do as she pleases as she has certainly earned the right (even or especially if it goes against the grain for Americans) as the most decorated Dutch female distance runner ever - whose range is unparalleled. There is no qualifying standard for XC, and the Dutch can damn well do as they please, without approval from Americans. Doing world XC soon after a sub-par (for her) Marathon may not be everyone's cup of tea, but she certainly isn't afraid of racing or at least challenging herself. If it goes poorly, then it can be argued that it wasn't the right thing to do - but it is her career after all.
Exactly.
Comparing America to The Netherlands.... this country has the size of Virginia.