Right. The problem is not the 75 year occupation, the ongoing land theft, the oppression, the periodic mass bombings all done by Israel.
The idea of "occupation" is also a myth. Jews, along with Muslims, have occupied the land for thousands of years, even before the founding on Israel. The land of Palestine was mostly owned publicly by the Ottomans who passed it to Britain to establish the Jewish state of Israel and partition land to the Arabs as well. Not wanting a Jewish state to exist, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon joined to take over the land partitioned to the Jews by the League of Nations, and they lost.
Not once in the history of the founding of Israel did Jews steal/occupy/overrun Palestinian land, it was all given legally. It was the Arabs who tried to take the land back by force, this is well documented and not refuted. You might be able to fool some idiots who are overly emotional and don't understand history, but some people actually have some sort of knowledge. Now enough with your idiotic propaganda.
Pro-Zionist talking points. That's all you stated.
A few things:
1) Israel is an annoying step-child to U.S. Israel is not an ally.
2) Australians, Brits, French and Germans spy on U.S. When they are caught, either nothing is said or U.S. government officials tell Australia, Great Britain, France and Germany to knock it off. When Israelis spy on U.S., U.S. government execute them or throw them in prison.
3) There is no military alliance. There is no contract. This won't go any further from U.S. military. Jackie Speier can scream and cry on floor of Congress, we (U.S.) will not send it military personnel for Israel.
You can continue posting pro-Zionist talking points if you like.
I’ve been listening to these Palestinian stick lickers my entire adult life. Still waiting for the first one to board a plane, head over and fight the “Zionists.”
Just keep whining on the internet. That’s all you’re gonna do.
The idea of "occupation" is also a myth. Jews, along with Muslims, have occupied the land for thousands of years, even before the founding on Israel. The land of Palestine was mostly owned publicly by the Ottomans who passed it to Britain to establish the Jewish state of Israel and partition land to the Arabs as well. Not wanting a Jewish state to exist, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon joined to take over the land partitioned to the Jews by the League of Nations, and they lost.
Not once in the history of the founding of Israel did Jews steal/occupy/overrun Palestinian land, it was all given legally. It was the Arabs who tried to take the land back by force, this is well documented and not refuted. You might be able to fool some idiots who are overly emotional and don't understand history, but some people actually have some sort of knowledge. Now enough with your idiotic propaganda.
Pro-Zionist talking points. That's all you stated.
A few things:
1) Israel is an annoying step-child to U.S. Israel is not an ally.
2) Australians, Brits, French and Germans spy on U.S. When they are caught, either nothing is said or U.S. government officials tell Australia, Great Britain, France and Germany to knock it off. When Israelis spy on U.S., U.S. government execute them or throw them in prison.
3) There is no military alliance. There is no contract. This won't go any further from U.S. military. Jackie Speier can scream and cry on floor of Congress, we (U.S.) will not send it military personnel for Israel.
You can continue posting pro-Zionist talking points if you like.
The dullards who are the right-wing think science is just another political cause. If Trump says there is a climate crisis they would believe him.
You don't believe in science, so why are you making fun of them?
That you say I don't "believe" in science shows you don't see it as any different from any kind of religion or other form of wishful thinking. That is, as I said, the thinking of the right.
Pro-Zionist talking points. That's all you stated.
A few things:
1) Israel is an annoying step-child to U.S. Israel is not an ally.
2) Australians, Brits, French and Germans spy on U.S. When they are caught, either nothing is said or U.S. government officials tell Australia, Great Britain, France and Germany to knock it off. When Israelis spy on U.S., U.S. government execute them or throw them in prison.
3) There is no military alliance. There is no contract. This won't go any further from U.S. military. Jackie Speier can scream and cry on floor of Congress, we (U.S.) will not send it military personnel for Israel.
You can continue posting pro-Zionist talking points if you like.
Everything I said is just basic history.
Leftist dip sticks don’t care. It’s their little pet issue that gives their pathetic lives meaning. The rest of the Arab world could care less about the Palestinians as evidenced by Egypt keeping its border closed.
Lots of people were killed. Yet our little friend seems to be only calling for the slaughter of Jews. There really should be no surprise. She is from Sweeden. A country that was so morally bankrupt they couldn't decide which side to be on during WW2.
Asking Israel to stop killing tens of thousands of Gazans is not "calling for the slaughter of Jews."
That's what happens when you let a terrorist group who attacks neighboring countries run your city, your city gets its borders closed from BOTH neighboring countries and you have rockets fly into your territory after you carry out the deadliest terror attack on Israel in decades.
If you weren't a genocidal sociopath, you'd understand Gaza's responsibility in their own destruction.
So it was a myth but now it's that's what you get?
Right. The problem is not the 75 year occupation, the ongoing land theft, the oppression, the periodic mass bombings all done by Israel.
The idea of "occupation" is also a myth. Jews, along with Muslims, have occupied the land for thousands of years, even before the founding on Israel. The land of Palestine was mostly owned publicly by the Ottomans who passed it to Britain to establish the Jewish state of Israel and partition land to the Arabs as well. Not wanting a Jewish state to exist, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon joined to take over the land partitioned to the Jews by the League of Nations, and they lost.
Not once in the history of the founding of Israel did Jews steal/occupy/overrun Palestinian land, it was all given legally. It was the Arabs who tried to take the land back by force, this is well documented and not refuted. You might be able to fool some idiots who are overly emotional and don't understand history, but some people actually have some sort of knowledge. Now enough with your idiotic propaganda.
The non Jews living in Palestine willingly left their land and homes to Euro Jews, never to be allowed to return? 750,000 of them?
You don't believe in science, so why are you making fun of them?
That you say I don't "believe" in science shows you don't see it as any different from any kind of religion or other form of wishful thinking. That is, as I said, the thinking of the right.
You are an idiot. I am definitely not right-leaning. As usual, you make sh.it up about people. Just be quiet and leave.
That you say I don't "believe" in science shows you don't see it as any different from any kind of religion or other form of wishful thinking. That is, as I said, the thinking of the right.
You are an idiot. I am definitely not right-leaning. As usual, you make sh.it up about people. Just be quiet and leave.
Talking of making sh*t up - only an idiot says I don't "believe" in science. It isn't a matter of belief - as religion is - but that you use the term shows you don't know that. It is about knowledge. So ignorant as well as presuming (wrongly) to know what I think.
You are an idiot. I am definitely not right-leaning. As usual, you make sh.it up about people. Just be quiet and leave.
Talking of making sh*t up - only an idiot says I don't "believe" in science. It isn't a matter of belief - as religion is - but that you use the term shows you don't know that. It is about knowledge. So ignorant as well as presuming (wrongly) to know what I think.
You don't understand any of the science.
You believe you're being told the truth and you don't question it.
You're worse than religious people in that they doubt their faith at times while you are always absolutely certain you're being told the truth. Unless science tells you men can't get pregnant of course.
Talking of making sh*t up - only an idiot says I don't "believe" in science. It isn't a matter of belief - as religion is - but that you use the term shows you don't know that. It is about knowledge. So ignorant as well as presuming (wrongly) to know what I think.
You don't understand any of the science.
You believe you're being told the truth and you don't question it.
You're worse than religious people in that they doubt their faith at times while you are always absolutely certain you're being told the truth. Unless science tells you men can't get pregnant of course.
"Science" doesn't "tell" me anything; it is a process in which all claims to knowledge or fact have to be tested before they can be accepted. It constantly changes as knowledge improves, by the same process of hypothesis, testing and analysis. Nothing of what you claim would survive that process. You lead the pitchforks and lanterns brigade.
I don't think the climate movement is dying. The situation is not as dire as Greta and her kind commonly say it is, but there's certainly some reason for concern and there is nothing wrong with being more sustainable and less destructive of the environment.
I think what you're actually seeing with her shifting over to a new activist movement is just the standard tactic of the 21st century leftist: perpetual revolution. There's a meme on the right about leftists obsessing over "[current thing]" and that's why that meme came about: since the Frankfurt School and its proteges and followers took over leftist thought, the goal is no longer "overthrow specific governments with a series of national Marxist uprisings" but rather "just kind of destabilize everything, using whatever issues are most likely to do so." Climate change is kind of always available to criticize and demoralize people, but sometimes big flashpoint issues come to the fore, like Israel-Palestine at the moment. Greta is just doing her job as a good little leftist, and seeking to demoralize people (and thus destabilize nations) using whatever "[current thing]" is going at the moment. This is also why American leftists have hammered race and gender stuff so hard for a decade, because those are evergreen issues in this country (especially race). Greta's not American so she goes with a more international issue. The goal of all this is to destabilize nations to the point where socialism can wheedle its way into power. They know they aren't gonna rise up suddenly and beat 21st-century armies and governments like the reds of old could do in the 20th century, so they're playing a longer but more sinister game.
You believe you're being told the truth and you don't question it.
You're worse than religious people in that they doubt their faith at times while you are always absolutely certain you're being told the truth. Unless science tells you men can't get pregnant of course.
"Science" doesn't "tell" me anything; it is a process in which all claims to knowledge or fact have to be tested before they can be accepted. It constantly changes as knowledge improves, by the same process of hypothesis, testing and analysis. Nothing of what you claim would survive that process. You lead the pitchforks and lanterns brigade.
Do you not understand that the "science" is relayed to you through a human?
You're not doing any science yourself you just believe what you're told to believe.
You have faith that when they tell you the polar ice caps will be completely melted by 2014 that it is true because it's "SCIENCE". When these scientific claims turn out to be wrong you pretend it never happened. Like a religious zealot.
"Science" doesn't "tell" me anything; it is a process in which all claims to knowledge or fact have to be tested before they can be accepted. It constantly changes as knowledge improves, by the same process of hypothesis, testing and analysis. Nothing of what you claim would survive that process. You lead the pitchforks and lanterns brigade.
Do you not understand that the "science" is relayed to you through a human?
You're not doing any science yourself you just believe what you're told to believe.
You have faith that when they tell you the polar ice caps will be completely melted by 2014 that it is true because it's "SCIENCE". When these scientific claims turn out to be wrong you pretend it never happened. Like a religious zealot.
Well the problem for you is those idiotic counter-arguments you cling too are also relayed to you through a human (and also several large oil companies who make trillions more than any climate scientist).
Are you personally look at the CO2 concentrations now verse 1000 years ago (I have). That is why there are safeguards and checks on real science. Your skepticism has NONE of that. You're just operating on "vibes" because you don't know or don't care or are too invested politicially in one side.
Oh and 40+ years of predictions have some the scientific claims to be quite accurate. (Please don't bring up a Time cover from the 70s.)
Do you not understand that the "science" is relayed to you through a human?
You're not doing any science yourself you just believe what you're told to believe.
You have faith that when they tell you the polar ice caps will be completely melted by 2014 that it is true because it's "SCIENCE". When these scientific claims turn out to be wrong you pretend it never happened. Like a religious zealot.
Well the problem for you is those idiotic counter-arguments you cling too are also relayed to you through a human (and also several large oil companies who make trillions more than any climate scientist).
Are you personally look at the CO2 concentrations now verse 1000 years ago (I have). That is why there are safeguards and checks on real science. Your skepticism has NONE of that. You're just operating on "vibes" because you don't know or don't care or are too invested politicially in one side.
Oh and 40+ years of predictions have some the scientific claims to be quite accurate. (Please don't bring up a Time cover from the 70s.)
You don't need counter-arguments to notice arguments are wrong.
Pretty much all of the climate predictions from the 80s, 90s, and Al Gore's movie have failed to occur.
If someone tells you it's raining you don't need a PhD to look out the window and check.
The claims are NOT "quite accurate" the models all overpredict warming.
Well the problem for you is those idiotic counter-arguments you cling too are also relayed to you through a human (and also several large oil companies who make trillions more than any climate scientist).
Are you personally look at the CO2 concentrations now verse 1000 years ago (I have). That is why there are safeguards and checks on real science. Your skepticism has NONE of that. You're just operating on "vibes" because you don't know or don't care or are too invested politicially in one side.
Oh and 40+ years of predictions have some the scientific claims to be quite accurate. (Please don't bring up a Time cover from the 70s.)
You don't need counter-arguments to notice arguments are wrong.
Pretty much all of the climate predictions from the 80s, 90s, and Al Gore's movie have failed to occur.
If someone tells you it's raining you don't need a PhD to look out the window and check.
The claims are NOT "quite accurate" the models all overpredict warming.
Classic dumb guy response. Climate skeptics rely on a whole host of absurdities to explain the obvious warming. We all have the effects. It's takes a truly foolish person to deny what is happening or worse think it is all some conspiracy. If it is raining, you should acknowledge it.
40 years ago, scientists predicted climate change. And hey, they were right (theconversation.com)
You don't need counter-arguments to notice arguments are wrong.
Pretty much all of the climate predictions from the 80s, 90s, and Al Gore's movie have failed to occur.
If someone tells you it's raining you don't need a PhD to look out the window and check.
The claims are NOT "quite accurate" the models all overpredict warming.
Classic dumb guy response. Climate skeptics rely on a whole host of absurdities to explain the obvious warming. We all have the effects. It's takes a truly foolish person to deny what is happening or worse think it is all some conspiracy. If it is raining, you should acknowledge it.
40 years ago, scientists predicted climate change. And hey, they were right (theconversation.com)
The earth has been warming and sea levels have been rising for thousands of years now.
Only scientifically illiterate people like yourself think this is some new phenomenon.
No one denies the warming. The question is what's causing it and what can/should we do about it.
No one has any idea what percentage of current warming is attributable to human activity.
There is no temperature data for 90% of the earth prior to the satellites going up very recently.
You're the "dumb guy" here. You've given this zero thought and haven't looked at anything.
