Gee. What's more likely? That a runner involved in a major doping scandal and coached by people credibly accused of seriously doping their athletes is by pure coincidence historically fast (second fastest college times ever in the 800 and 1500), or that such times are possible because she is being doped, which would easily account for her performance? That's the sport we have, where talent can come in a bottle and is virtually impossible to catch. You give steroids and epo to a 4:12 1500m runner and you will get a 4:00 or better runner. Give the same to a 2:05 800m runner and you will get a sub-2:00 runner. Houlihan got to 3:55 after a college pr 4:09. Chemusto was suddenly able to run the sea level equivalent of 3:54. Lauren Johnson made a WT after a college pr of 4:58 in the mile. Etc. Especially in college, which is at least a safe harbor of clean sport in distance running, it is a perverse thing to do.