BYU needs new shorts?

Suppressing these students of sexual activity due to their mormon lifestyle definitely generally has a negative effect on their sexual related behavior. Dont blame the athletes, blame the reprehensible system of indoctrination that they are essentially forced to submit to.

BoA wrote:

ugly hidden truth. wrote:

I have never seen anyone pull up their shorts as high as that guy. His shorts were pulled up so high it would be impossible for anyone's "plums" not to show. The shorts were so high, a woman's vag even would look big.

If you run with your boys hanging out and you don't cover up, yeah it will be noticed.

Of course any male would feel themselves coming out and dangling. "oh I didn't notice that I am dangling out".....yeah right

I think having the shorts ride up high as possible helps to not restrict his hip muscle during the jumps.

And pulling his shorts up so high after the run, is that to help in hip muscle recovery?

Those shorts couldn't have been any higher if he was wearing spankies.

The boy is getting the attention he wants and BYU not so much.

(Do you think the BYU coach likes to see his runners like that?)

I don't know about other brand shorts but Nike short shorts' inner piece loses elasticity after 2 dozen washes. Maybe old shorts and this guy was wearing it pretty tight spells disaster. But I agree that how could he not know after the same thing happened in the prelim? BYU only give athletics one shorts?

I wonder if he ripped off the inner piece altogether? It looks like they were falling out after the first turn already.

Have any of you runners of at least average size down there ever tried sprinting or jumping without support? Its like female runners who have to wear bras. A small breasted runner can run without a bra, but that would created much discomfort for a large breasted woman.

A least average sized guy cannot sprint, without support down there, without a good deal of discomfort. There is major uncomfortable bouncing. Am I right guys? Probably smaller sized guy might be able to do it without discomfort.

So I don't see why someone would rip out lining.

The lining is there for a reason and he clearly doesn't have it. Those shorts also seem very tight on him, maybe he needs a bigger size up LOL

This wasn’t a problem before HD cameras.

Star wrote:

This wasn’t a problem before HD cameras.

How many of you have watched the video multiple times and stepped through frame by frame?

To play Devil's advocate, why don't we support this guy and say it's his body, he can show what he wants? It's the response I got from some in the women's exposed butt cheeks thread.

NOBODY wants to see their junk, not even their sister-wives or grandma-cousins.

Not a Prude wrote:

Star wrote:

This wasn’t a problem before HD cameras.

How many of you have watched the video multiple times and stepped through frame by frame?

To play Devil's advocate, why don't we support this guy and say it's his body, he can show what he wants? It's the response I got from some in the women's exposed butt cheeks thread.

So you think wanted to show his testicles to the crowd? Some of us agree with you on that point.

If I pulled my shorts up above my crotch line and kept it there after the race, and my boys came out, I would definitely know it. If I chose not to cover them up, it would be because I wanted the crowd, which included mothers and young kid sisters, to see them. So you are probably right on that point.

Watch the race and focus on form. Either he has a naturally ungainly style with knees/legs paddling out on an angle, or he's running the way any guy with his sack out would run. Watch all the guys formwise and he sticks out, pardon the pun, like a sore thumb. As if he's running trying to avoid his nuts getting knocked from all the swinging. Just saying...

I actually watched race before this thread. I am now surprised I didn't notice it. You have to give him a credit though for very well run race. He ran very well. He made the crucial move with 550 meters to go.

I don’t know any woman who runs without a bra. Way too painful even for small-chested women.

Possible explanations for this:

1- He chose to pull up his shorts, cut out the liner, and/or wear a smaller size to avoid thigh rub, chafing, pain and blood. He has some big powerful thighs and those shorts are a problem. He decided to risk swinging free instead of unavoidable friction.

2- He chose to save face by not responding to the problem. Ignore the truth and master the big lie. Believe that it never happened and others will agree. There is no place to hide on the track especially in the final on national TV. Happened during qualifying too. Trying to correct the issue would only bring more attention to it.

3- He's a senior so those shorts might be really old and worn out, more so if he took them on a mission.

4- It was the plan all along. Only he knows why. Tired of having to mask up? But he got away with it.

Look at the grin on his face at the 7:54 mark of the youtube vid. Happy for PB, 4th OA, and...

The guy deserves major props for this.

Maybe you can explain that to the ten year old girl, asking her mom why that man is standing there with his testicles out.

By the way, runners are cool dudes not nerds oblivious to others perceptions and feelings.......most of them anyway.

jcaban wrote:

I don’t know any woman who runs without a bra. Way too painful even for small-chested women.

The 70s. Dolfin singlets.

First Mantz in XC, now this dude.

Mormons and porn. Go figure.

he did the same ball sack performance at regionals too, he knows he's hanging and (cameras are rolling) chooses not to wear larger shorts. Maybe looking for an MTV reality show or something

This is Jim Kiler wrote:

First Mantz in XC, now this dude.

Mormons and porn. Go figure.

Porn's highest consumers. It's a fact.