The greatest thing about Warholm is how he competes.
He attacks every time.
He will get the most out of his talent.
The greatest thing about Warholm is how he competes.
He attacks every time.
He will get the most out of his talent.
split the difference wrote:
wth wow wrote:
Lol. Time to break record was not discussed. Difference from current time to WR was discussed. Moran.
^ A moran who can't read makes a complete fool of himself. #sad
The first SEVEN posts, since you are incapable of finding them, let alone reading them and understanding the words.
Post 1: 400h - WARHOLM 46.87
Post 2: .11 to go
Post 3: jesus... almost had it before brushing that last hurdle ... Samba and Rai watching at home excited as hell
Post 4: Even with hitting the final hurdle. The WR will go down just a matter of when.
Post 5: and that's after hitting the last hurdle and slowing down significantly!!
Post 6; he would run better is f he went out harder . 8-) ... Great run
Post 7: Shocked that he came that close in a stadium with no atmosphere. Seemed like a windy stadium too. ... Would rather see the WR go in a packed, excited stadium. Not in front of a few cardboard cutouts.
Lol. Why are you continuing to embarrass yourself. Warholm did not need a .10 to achieve the record. He only needed a .09. The only difference is that with .09 he would be sharing the record. Now go back to your basement fool.
jabouk wrote:
jesus... almost had it before brushing that last hurdle
Samba and Rai watching at home excited as hell
More like sitting at home trying to figure out whose going to get silver.
This dude is on a whole different level. He could medal in the regular 400 as well.
Love how he just goes as hard as possible from the jump.
Post 1: 400h - WARHOLM 46.87
Post 2: .11 to go
Post 3: jesus... almost had it before brushing that last hurdle ... Samba and Rai watching at home excited as hell
Post 4: Even with hitting the final hurdle. The WR will go down just a matter of when.
Post 5: and that's after hitting the last hurdle and slowing down significantly!!
Post 6; he would run better is f he went out harder . 8-) ... Great run
Post 7: Shocked that he came that close in a stadium with no atmosphere. Seemed like a windy stadium too. ... Would rather see the WR go in a packed, excited stadium. Not in front of a few cardboard cutouts.[/quote]
Lol. Why are you continuing to embarrass yourself. Warholm did not need a .10 to achieve the record. He only needed a .09. The only difference is that with .09 he would be sharing the record. Now go back to your basement fool.[/quote]
Little boy, where do the words "sharing" or "achieve" appear in the first seven posts?
0/10
gordanshumway wrote:
Obviously no testing happening in Norway. This guy is a joke.
+1
Same stuff as Jakob?
Norway has discovered some drug we don't know. Remember how they suddenly won big at the Winter Games? Years from now we will know
Needs to hug the curve more he's running more in the middle of it.
rhodester wrote:
Norway has discovered some drug we don't know. Remember how they suddenly won big at the Winter Games? Years from now we will know
Its called "olympiatoppen". Started with "Prosjekt '88" in 1985 and later became todays olympiatoppen with one sole goal; develop Norwegian top sports. Feel free to Google it. Has nothing to do with doping tho.
split the difference wrote:
Post 1: 400h - WARHOLM 46.87
Post 2: .11 to go
Post 3: jesus... almost had it before brushing that last hurdle ... Samba and Rai watching at home excited as hell
Post 4: Even with hitting the final hurdle. The WR will go down just a matter of when.
Post 5: and that's after hitting the last hurdle and slowing down significantly!!
Post 6; he would run better is f he went out harder . 8-) ... Great run
Post 7: Shocked that he came that close in a stadium with no atmosphere. Seemed like a windy stadium too. ... Would rather see the WR go in a packed, excited stadium. Not in front of a few cardboard cutouts.
Lol. Why are you continuing to embarrass yourself. Warholm did not need a .10 to achieve the record. He only needed a .09. The only difference is that with .09 he would be sharing the record. Now go back to your basement fool.[/quote]
Little boy, where do the words "sharing" or "achieve" appear in the first seven posts?
0/10[/quote]
oy vey!
norwegiannectar wrote:
gordanshumway wrote:
Obviously no testing happening in Norway. This guy is a joke.
+1
Same stuff as Jakob?
I would say far less of a joke than any of the current WR holders 100-10000
paul72 wrote:
An a-hole wrote:
He lost the WR with that hurdle clip there. Then again young also clipped the final hurdle when he set the WR.
However Warholm stumbled a tiny bit, where as Young kinda just kicked it and it didn't affect his stride (though it cost him some time obviously). The tiny bit of lateral motion was easily the .11 seconds between today and the WR.
The only man in history with multiple 46s. Not gonna lie when Warholm won in London 2017, which was just an awful track meet all around, in the horrible weather, in such a slow time, I thought it was a fluke and that was going to highlight of his career.
Instead he's proven himself to be the king of the event. Sure Samba and Benjamin are close but neither are as consistent as Warholm is, and he's come out on top every time they've raced. I hope he gets the WR
agree-that Young record is phenominal ,and as you mentioned Young hit the final hurdle also, but it would be nice for Warholm to get it at a big meet with fans/atmosphere...
Young's 46.78 is definitely the worst (or better: the least good) men's world record (standard events). To be comparabel with the 400 record it should be at least 46.50, but for sure 9.58 is even better...
46.78 is also already the longest standing men's running world record in history (over 28 years).
Walter George held the Mile world record from 1886 for 27 years.
Warholm chose lane 8 on purpose to get better protection against the wind at Stockholm stadium.
the 4 wrote:
Shocked that he came that close in a stadium with no atmosphere. Seemed like a windy stadium too.
Would rather see the WR go in a packed, excited stadium. Not in front of a few cardboard cutouts.
They had a 3.0 tailwind in the 200, so big headwind in the back sstraight. Doesn't usually help a 1-lap event. He ran 46.87 despite that and clipping the last hurdle.
zxcvzxvc wrote:
Warholm had reason to be sorry he'd just missed it, because he was left in the blocks with a slow reaction time, judging by the video, and then hit that last hurdle hard enough to slow him significantly. He was also stuck in lane 8. He can beat this record by several tenths from lane 5 against Benjamin or Samba with a clean run.
He chose lane 8.
I think rai is due for a 46.3, I called it.
Kingholm wrote:
gordanshumway wrote:
Obviously no testing happening in Norway. This guy is a joke.
He is just a very rare athletics talent, as we can see from his octathlon performance.
like Ashton Eaton but slower...Funny how fast this man is now. compared to Eaton his is not that big of a Talent but his times exceed him but he was never ahead of Eaton.
He did not appear to slow much at all.
I'm with Ato on this one.
It cost him a few hundredths of a second but not the WR
forget about it wrote:
Kingholm wrote:
He is just a very rare athletics talent, as we can see from his octathlon performance.
like Ashton Eaton but slower...Funny how fast this man is now. compared to Eaton his is not that big of a Talent but his times exceed him but he was never ahead of Eaton.
Wrong on both counts. At this point in time I dont think anyone sane would call Eaton faster or more talented. Warholm basically ran Eaton's 400 PR just after running a near WR in the 400H. Eaton is talented. Warholm is mindblowing talented.
True. And others are right. The last hurdle didn't cost him the WR. Incredible runner with even more upside potential. Fierce competitor. Goes out hard and holds on. Formula for success with his talent.