formerly present wrote:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/
Oh Biden has a high approval rating??? Do you Libs even think before posting his relatively high approval rating. Whereas 95% of the mainstream media 's reporting on Trump was negative, MSNBC, CNN, ABC NEWS et al. only report positively on Biden. Nothing negative and the viewers think he is the second coming of the Messiah. To say they are unsophisticated would be a huge understatement . Did any report that Biden''s press conference was pre-screened for questions, only took questions from friendly news groups and needed note cards to answer every question. Oh, Biden has been given trillions of free money to everyone. Of course his approval rating will be high.
Sure, the right will weaponize any funding to help people pay for college.
That doesn’t make it a bad plan.
They weaponize anything they can.
They weaponized the ACA, which they called Obamacare.
It gained them the House in 2010 and the Senate on 2014.
After gaining the presidency in 2016 did they get rid of it?
No. Because it was good and people like it.
Helping people pay for college will help those that don’t go to college with a stronger economy and a higher demand for their services.
You do what is right for the country.
L L wrote:
Sure, the right will weaponize any funding to help people pay for college.
That doesn’t make it a bad plan.
They weaponize anything they can.
They weaponized the ACA, which they called Obamacare.
It gained them the House in 2010 and the Senate on 2014.
After gaining the presidency in 2016 did they get rid of it?
No. Because it was good and people like it.
Helping people pay for college will help those that don’t go to college with a stronger economy and a higher demand for their services.
You do what is right for the country.
How can you say Obamacare was good for the country?? How can any legislation that totally excludes the other party from participating in the drafting of the legislation good for the country? How was Obamacare good for the country when Obama lied about no one would pay more in premiums when instead on average everyone's premium went up $2,500. LL - you are not the typical liberal here, but read much more than what the liberal news groups put out . They are not being honest with you
L L wrote:
Helping people pay for college will help those that don’t go to college with a stronger economy and a higher demand for their services.
You do what is right for the country.
Oh man, that's trickle-down if I've ever seen it.
The only thing student debt forgiveness will do is make high earners like doctors and lawyers even wealthier. The "smart way to do it" would be to put an income cap on it and it would be so low that it would effectively do nothing for the economy.
The problem is this: most people struggling to pay student loan debt need a lot more economic help than just having those loans absolved.
Trollminator wrote:
formerly present wrote:
So, wait--I agree with GoI on something? WIll wonders never cease.
😂Igy with a strong endorsement of Biden... dude may be racist, but he’s definitely also senile.
You probably need to be at the top of the list of posters that hates his neighbors, yet professes a higher standard. Partisan turd, where everything is digested into a political color based on what you believe in. Immature thought process, if thinking at all.
Hammering Hank wrote:
L L wrote:
Sure, the right will weaponize any funding to help people pay for college.
That doesn’t make it a bad plan.
They weaponize anything they can.
They weaponized the ACA, which they called Obamacare.
It gained them the House in 2010 and the Senate on 2014.
After gaining the presidency in 2016 did they get rid of it?
No. Because it was good and people like it.
Helping people pay for college will help those that don’t go to college with a stronger economy and a higher demand for their services.
You do what is right for the country.
How can you say Obamacare was good for the country?? How can any legislation that totally excludes the other party from participating in the drafting of the legislation good for the country? How was Obamacare good for the country when Obama lied about no one would pay more in premiums when instead on average everyone's premium went up $2,500. LL - you are not the typical liberal here, but read much more than what the liberal news groups put out . They are not being honest with you
Alright everyone, listen up, here's the spread for Hammering Hank:
3:1 it's Sally Vix
5:1 it's Hardloper
10:1 it's jamin
25:1 it's rojo (<- darkhorse, could be a huge payout)
15:1 it's Flagpole desperate for any kind of attention.
Bets should be in by midnight. I'll use an open source textual analysis and compare at least 20 HH posts to 20 posts from the above users and let you know who comes up with the highest percent match
Racket, PhD wrote:
Hammering Hank wrote:
How can you say Obamacare was good for the country?? How can any legislation that totally excludes the other party from participating in the drafting of the legislation good for the country? How was Obamacare good for the country when Obama lied about no one would pay more in premiums when instead on average everyone's premium went up $2,500. LL - you are not the typical liberal here, but read much more than what the liberal news groups put out . They are not being honest with you
Alright everyone, listen up, here's the spread for Hammering Hank:
3:1 it's Sally Vix
5:1 it's Hardloper
10:1 it's jamin
25:1 it's rojo (<- darkhorse, could be a huge payout)
15:1 it's Flagpole desperate for any kind of attention.
Bets should be in by midnight. I'll use an open source textual analysis and compare at least 20 HH posts to 20 posts from the above users and let you know who comes up with the highest percent match
Not sure why I am responding to you ., your posts are always so juvenile ... and I say that respectfully. I am Sally V, Calamity J And Hammering Hank which I began using 3 or 4 weeks ago. No others.
If Obamacare was so bad, why couldn’t Republicans repeal and replace it when they had the presidency, the House and the Senate all at the same time?
Because people liked it.
And they had nothing better.
How do I place a bet?
It’s not trickle down because people graduate with debt and have very little income.
It helps mostly low earners.
Hardloper wrote:
How do I place a bet?
In bitcoin only. Good news, it's getting cheaper by the minute!
Hammering Hank wrote:
Racket, PhD wrote:
Alright everyone, listen up, here's the spread for Hammering Hank:
3:1 it's Sally Vix
5:1 it's Hardloper
10:1 it's jamin
25:1 it's rojo (<- darkhorse, could be a huge payout)
15:1 it's Flagpole desperate for any kind of attention.
Bets should be in by midnight. I'll use an open source textual analysis and compare at least 20 HH posts to 20 posts from the above users and let you know who comes up with the highest percent match
Not sure why I am responding to you ., your posts are always so juvenile ... and I say that respectfully. I am Sally V, Calamity J And Hammering Hank which I began using 3 or 4 weeks ago. No others.
Why don't you just use one handle and stick with it?
Racket, PhD wrote:
Hammering Hank wrote:
Not sure why I am responding to you ., your posts are always so juvenile ... and I say that respectfully. I am Sally V, Calamity J And Hammering Hank which I began using 3 or 4 weeks ago. No others.
Why don't you just use one handle and stick with it?
Oh my God wait.
What if Flagpole was Sally Vix this whole time
Racket, PhD wrote:
Racket, PhD wrote:
Why don't you just use one handle and stick with it?
Oh my God wait.
What if Flagpole was Sally Vix this whole time
It is funny you ask that. One person thought Flagple, me Sally V and Trollminator might be the same person. To keep that going for 3 years would drive anyone crazy .
Racket, PhD wrote:
Hammering Hank wrote:
Not sure why I am responding to you ., your posts are always so juvenile ... and I say that respectfully. I am Sally V, Calamity J And Hammering Hank which I began using 3 or 4 weeks ago. No others.
Why don't you just use one handle and stick with it?
Have you asked the Ginamator why she/he can't use one handle and stick with it?
another day of fewer vaccinations in the US. it's fewer every day despite the corralls being wide open, for anyone over age 16.
I think that means demand is pretty low among the under 30 set.
A med person tried to drag me in to get shots today as I walked on a city street...I suspect that lack of demand will be the headlines next week.
Then the US has to decide what to do with the hundreds of millions of shots Americans don't want. Ship them to Africa and Asia?
Probably.
Hammering Hank wrote:
Racket, PhD wrote:
Oh my God wait.
What if Flagpole was Sally Vix this whole time
It is funny you ask that. One person thought Flagple, me Sally V and Trollminator might be the same person. To keep that going for 3 years would drive anyone crazy .
Have you ever been screened for autism?
agip wrote:
another day of fewer vaccinations in the US. it's fewer every day despite the corralls being wide open, for anyone over age 16.
I think that means demand is pretty low among the under 30 set.
A med person tried to drag me in to get shots today as I walked on a city street...I suspect that lack of demand will be the headlines next week.
Then the US has to decide what to do with the hundreds of millions of shots Americans don't want. Ship them to Africa and Asia?
Probably.
Logistic growth agip. It was bound to happen
Yeah. 2-3 million a day is still a lot. It is bound to slow down when over 50% of adults and over 80% of seniors already have one shot. Rates in Israel and UK slowed down around this point too. Approving for children 12+ will boost demand once it really starts to slump.