Judd Legum: This will be a thread of the many other women who have made specific allegations of sexual assault against Trump 🧵 1. Ninni Laaksonen, former Miss Finland. “Trump stood right next to me and suddenly he squeezed my butt” in July 2006. 2. Jessica Drake. Said Trump grabbed and kissed her without consent, then offered her 10K for sex in 2006. 3. Karena Virginia. Says she was groped by Trump at the U.S. Open in 1998. 4. Cathy Heller. Says Trump grabbed her and attempted to kiss her at Mar-a-lago in 1997. 5. Summer Zervos. Apprentice contestant says Trump started kissing her and grabbing her breasts, began "thrusting his genitals." 2007. 6. Kristin Anderson, who says Trump reached under her skirt and grabbed her vagina through her underwear in the early 1990s. 7. Jessica Leeds. Said Trump lifted up the armrest, grabbed her breasts and reached his hand up her skirt in the early 1980s. 8. Rachel Crooks. Says she was assaulted by Trump in an elevator in Trump Tower in 2005. 9. Mindy McGillivray. Says Trump groped her while she was attending a concert at Mar-a-lago in 2003. 10. Natasha Stoynoff. Says Trump pushed her against a wall and jammed his tongue down her throat at Mar-a-lago in 2005. 11. Jennifer Murphy. Apprentice contestant says Trump kissed her on the lips after a job interview in 2005. 12. Cassandra Searles. Says Trump grabbed her ass and invited her to his hotel room in 2013. 13. Temple Taggart McDowell. Former Miss Utah says Trump kissed her directly on the lips the first time she met him in 1997. 14. Jill Harth. Says Trump repeatedly sexually harassed her and groped her underneath a table in 1993.
Why are these 14 appearing on your crime blotter? Whatever happened to due process? These accusations have never been adjudicated. There were sexual assault/rape allegations against the Duke Lacrosse players. Whatever happened to those charges? Or did someone anoint Agip as judge, jury and executioner?
Judd Legum: This will be a thread of the many other women who have made specific allegations of sexual assault against Trump 🧵 1. Ninni Laaksonen, former Miss Finland. “Trump stood right next to me and suddenly he squeezed my butt” in July 2006. 2. Jessica Drake. Said Trump grabbed and kissed her without consent, then offered her 10K for sex in 2006. 3. Karena Virginia. Says she was groped by Trump at the U.S. Open in 1998. 4. Cathy Heller. Says Trump grabbed her and attempted to kiss her at Mar-a-lago in 1997. 5. Summer Zervos. Apprentice contestant says Trump started kissing her and grabbing her breasts, began "thrusting his genitals." 2007. 6. Kristin Anderson, who says Trump reached under her skirt and grabbed her vagina through her underwear in the early 1990s. 7. Jessica Leeds. Said Trump lifted up the armrest, grabbed her breasts and reached his hand up her skirt in the early 1980s. 8. Rachel Crooks. Says she was assaulted by Trump in an elevator in Trump Tower in 2005. 9. Mindy McGillivray. Says Trump groped her while she was attending a concert at Mar-a-lago in 2003. 10. Natasha Stoynoff. Says Trump pushed her against a wall and jammed his tongue down her throat at Mar-a-lago in 2005. 11. Jennifer Murphy. Apprentice contestant says Trump kissed her on the lips after a job interview in 2005. 12. Cassandra Searles. Says Trump grabbed her ass and invited her to his hotel room in 2013. 13. Temple Taggart McDowell. Former Miss Utah says Trump kissed her directly on the lips the first time she met him in 1997. 14. Jill Harth. Says Trump repeatedly sexually harassed her and groped her underneath a table in 1993.
Why are these 14 appearing on your crime blotter? Whatever happened to due process? These accusations have never been adjudicated. There were sexual assault/rape allegations against the Duke Lacrosse players. Whatever happened to those charges? Or did someone anoint Agip as judge, jury and executioner?
right back atchoo, Sally.
No bad talk about Hunter Biden until he is convicted. Not one single solitary word implying he did anything wrong. K?
Or did someone anoint Sally as judge, jury and executioner?
Why are these 14 appearing on your crime blotter? Whatever happened to due process? These accusations have never been adjudicated. There were sexual assault/rape allegations against the Duke Lacrosse players. Whatever happened to those charges? Or did someone anoint Agip as judge, jury and executioner?
right back atchoo, Sally.
No bad talk about Hunter Biden until he is convicted. Not one single solitary word implying he did anything wrong. K?
Or did someone anoint Sally as judge, jury and executioner?
No credible sources backing up the allegations made by those women.
A Justice Department investigation into Hunter Biden's business activities has gained steam in recent months, with a flurry of witnesses providing testimony to federal investigators and more expected to provide interviews in...
I'm just going to step up and say he's probably guilty of this and a whole lot more. But 'law and order conservatives' will not care. Again.
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. — Representative George Santos, the Republican whose pivotal victory in New York was soon followed by revelations that he had falsified his biography on the campaign trail, surrendered to the authorities at federal court on Long Island on Wednesday morning. Mr. Santos was charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.
But please dig into whether George Santos used campaign funds to pay for lip filler and pay no attention to the Biden family
Liberals are the lowest quality people on the planet. They can't be trusted to behave ethically in any capacity. The FBI and DoJ's credibility has been completely destroyed by these idiots.
But please dig into whether George Santos used campaign funds to pay for lip filler and pay no attention to the Biden family
Liberals are the lowest quality people on the planet. They can't be trusted to behave ethically in any capacity. The FBI and DoJ's credibility has been completely destroyed by these idiots.
Liberals have single-handedly tried to destroy every aspect of our Judeo-Christian nation as set forth in the clauses of our Constitution which the Founding Fathers killed for. Liberals have infected our justice system, legal system, courts, universities, law enforcement, medical profession, governments, agencies, even schools where they indoctrinate the national kids to anti-American ways and means. They hate Trump because he was the first politician with the balls to call them out on this. So they set out to destroy him with subversion and subrogation.
COMER: "bank records show the Biden family, their associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals and their companies.”https://t.co/KthP7CVg9N
— The Nasty Italian🍷🇺🇸 🇮🇹 (@sayitnspinit) May 10, 2023
Shell companies have been illegal since the 1950s! And yet, no one will prosecute them despite the shell evidence that is as plain as the earth is wide. Justice in America is an illusion generated by liberal elites to control the masses like junkies on a meth binge snorting the detritus out of some filthy backwoods trailer carpet.
Biden is so corrupt and he needs to be impeached, right Baghdad agip?
Agip is only "law and order" when the mean, nasty and bad republicans are involved. When Dems are part of the equation, Agip preaches "Let bygones be bygones!!"
If someone on the Democratic side has committed a crime, s/he should be punished for it under the law.
See how easy that was? No "But what about the Republicans!", no addressing other people's (potential) lawbreaking, just a straightforward affirmation of the rule of law.
Why is it that so many GOPers seemingly have a problem with making the same affirmation? Shouldn't an outfit that styles itself the "Law&Order!" Party embrace that concept? Shouldn't they be eager to find any lawbreakers in their ranks, and cast them out forthwith?
If someone on the Democratic side has committed a crime, s/he should be punished for it under the law.
See how easy that was? No "But what about the Republicans!", no addressing other people's (potential) lawbreaking, just a straightforward affirmation of the rule of law.
Why is it that so many GOPers seemingly have a problem with making the same affirmation? Shouldn't an outfit that styles itself the "Law&Order!" Party embrace that concept? Shouldn't they be eager to find any lawbreakers in their ranks, and cast them out forthwith?
I am making an affirmation that republicans are rejoicing that the Republican George Santos has been arrested and facing significant charges. We also rejoiced when Larry Craig was humiliated and forced to resign from his scandalous bathroom stall antics.
If someone on the Democratic side has committed a crime, s/he should be punished for it under the law.
See how easy that was? No "But what about the Republicans!", no addressing other people's (potential) lawbreaking, just a straightforward affirmation of the rule of law.
Why is it that so many GOPers seemingly have a problem with making the same affirmation? Shouldn't an outfit that styles itself the "Law&Order!" Party embrace that concept? Shouldn't they be eager to find any lawbreakers in their ranks, and cast them out forthwith?
Hillary committed numerous felonies. How come you didn't shout from the rooftops that she should be prosecuted?
If someone on the Democratic side has committed a crime, s/he should be punished for it under the law.
See how easy that was? No "But what about the Republicans!", no addressing other people's (potential) lawbreaking, just a straightforward affirmation of the rule of law.
Why is it that so many GOPers seemingly have a problem with making the same affirmation? Shouldn't an outfit that styles itself the "Law&Order!" Party embrace that concept? Shouldn't they be eager to find any lawbreakers in their ranks, and cast them out forthwith?
I'm afraid you're being rather naive, friendo.
If a Republican potentially commits a crime, his fellows in the party will close ranks around him, or at least keep quiet on the issue, not cast him out. To do the latter would be giving the Dems/libs a "win" and would be entirely unacceptable. Party trumps all.
Sure, law and order is a reasonable concept, especially if it might put some Democrats behind bars, but FIRST THINGS FIRST.
