and monitoring katelyn tuohy's chances of entering the usatf outdoor championships, heres the fast 5000m heat line up for sound running, 20 women who have PRs of 15:20 and under are set to run
now what are the odds, 17 women are going to go sub 15:14
and monitoring katelyn tuohy's chances of entering the usatf outdoor championships, heres the fast 5000m heat line up for sound running, 20 women who have PRs of 15:20 and under are set to run
now what are the odds, 17 women are going to go sub 15:14
is lauren ryan a good 5000m runner? but like shes going to be such a great pacer for this race
but this race wont have many under 15:20s .. probably 15:30s
that sound running race is going to be massive .. elly henes could win it and go for her first sub 15 .. her training at NAU has been phenomenal // she ran a PR of 58 400m at altitude in her workout
here's last year's results .. 12 women went sub 15:14 .. and last year was clearly the better and faster field with sifan hassan leading 5 runners to sub 15
also, what surprised me was that byu's orton achieved her 15:12.91 here, on such a fast race.... i could only imagine what time would katelyn tuohy get if she was entered in this year's meet and not in virginia .. 15:14 alone, basically already leading at 1800m and just going using the clock to push it.. imagine with professional pacing help and olympians to chase .. jenny's record would have been annihilated by sophomore tuohy
anyways, ill keep monitoring katelyn's chances for the usatf outdoor championships~
Chances are not something that you monitor. Chances are something that you calculate based on data. What Chances do you give her since you claim to be her biggest fan? I put the Chances at 20%.
I give her a 5% chance of competing because the odds are slim that she qualifies and she would likely not want to lose by 200 meters so she would decline it anyway.
Side Note. You don't need to be a tuohy fan to know that KATELYN TUOHY CAN qualify if she wants to, she can enter in sound running track meet or any fast meet and easily run sub 15:10 and qualify for the USATF Outdoor Championships, THAT'S A FACT.
You always make predictions while classifying them as fact. When Tuohy fails, you make up excuses. If she meets your expectations, you gush about how she exceeded them.
she would likely not want to lose by 200 meters so she would decline it anyway.
omg katelyn tuohy losing 200m to elise cranny and karissa schweizer??? that means additional 31s or 32s to 14:33 which is actually pretty accurate for a 15:05 time that was expected of tuohy at her best with pacers and pros... and if that happens, thats an NCAA outdoor 5000m record.
katelyn tuohy loves losing, she said that herself, thats the thing that kept her going in college.. she wouldnt be the runner she is today without her butt getting kicked by elly henes and hannah steelman and kelsey at workout last year and this year by her speedy friends anna vess and sam bush... but look at her now .. running faster than ever.
You always make predictions while classifying them as fact. When Tuohy fails, you make up excuses. If she meets your expectations, you gush about how she exceeded them.
says the person who said " she likely not want to lose by 200 meters so she would decline it anyway."
i celebrated her every loss and win .. dig deep and see it for yourself. . . failure is ok for me. . . i was just as loud of a fan when tuohy was running 15;47 and when she was getting her butt kicked.. my "expectations" are mere bubbles .. what she runs is what i celebrate... im not like some tall who feels so entitled .. ew .. tuohy doesnt run for you.
Side Note. You don't need to be a tuohy fan to know that KATELYN TUOHY CAN qualify if she wants to, she can enter in sound running track meet or any fast meet and easily run sub 15:10 and qualify for the USATF Outdoor Championships, THAT'S A FACT.
FYI, a fact is only a fact after something has happened.
Or maybe an educated extrapolation/estimate. The entire point of this thread was to extrapolate a time based on her race at the NCAA finals. Based on how the race transpired and who she was able to compete with it was clear that she was capable of running significantly faster that 15:30. And she has. I predicted 15:10-15:15.
We can also do the same extrapolation based on her latest race. So the fact that she was able to run 15:14 in a normal college race running from the front the final 3200m and did not have any faster pro runners to chase or draft off of reasonably indicates that if she had run in a faster pro race such as Mt. Sacs she was capable of a faster time. I think she would have run under 15:10. Don't think that is going out on a limb.