Official LRC President Joseph R Biden Thread

Mick Joggerrr wrote:

Looks like Trump might have yet another felony with exposure.... There is testimony that Trump advised personal staff to leak information to the media about private FBI agent Identifications so the right wing ecosystem could do their thing to them.

Of course, this was Trump's MO as it is with any aspiring dictator. Dictators don't follow the laws, instead they change the laws or get rid of anyone that appears to try to hold them accountable.

Sally Vix wrote:

Mick Joggerrr wrote:

Looks like Trump might have yet another felony with exposure.... There is testimony that Trump advised personal staff to leak information to the media about private FBI agent Identifications so the right wing ecosystem could do their thing to them.

Of course, this was Trump's MO as it is with any aspiring dictator. Dictators don't follow the laws, instead they change the laws or get rid of anyone that appears to try to hold them accountable.

Is this Felony No. 88 or No. 89 that is going to bring Trump down? If only I had a penny for every felony Trump committed ....

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Is this Felony No. 88 or No. 89 that is going to bring Trump down? If only I had a penny for every felony Trump committed ....

turns out the DOJ is too terrified of m'aga to prosecute Trump. We're doomed.

agip wrote:

Anyone know why they deleted the Ukraine war thread? ticks me off. I mean why? One thread on the most important development in the world seems valid.

nonequals wrote:

agip wrote:

Anyone know why they deleted the Ukraine war thread? ticks me off. I mean why? One thread on the most important development in the world seems valid.

agip, please consider the POSSIBILITY that LRC having removed the pointless time-suck of going AROUND AND AROUND AND AROUND with the likes of Ceccione (or whatever his name is) and the other morans on that thread was, in fact, a considerable favor.

In fact, perhaps a "Thank you" note to the fine brothers is in order.

nonequals wrote:

agip wrote:

Anyone know why they deleted the Ukraine war thread? ticks me off. I mean why? One thread on the most important development in the world seems valid.

agip, please consider the POSSIBILITY that LRC having removed the pointless time-suck of going AROUND AND AROUND AND AROUND with the likes of Ceccione (or whatever his name is) and the other morans on that thread was, in fact, a considerable favor.

In fact, perhaps a "Thank you" note to the fine brothers is in order.

agip wrote:

nonequals wrote:

agip, please consider the POSSIBILITY that LRC having removed the pointless time-suck of going AROUND AND AROUND AND AROUND with the likes of Ceccione (or whatever his name is) and the other morans on that thread was, in fact, a considerable favor.

In fact, perhaps a "Thank you" note to the fine brothers is in order.

yeah I know.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

agip wrote:

yeah I know.

When one of you gets your feelings hurt you complain and the mods delete the entire thread.

I'm sure the complainer was our fake naval hero nonequals.

He gets very triggered when his fake service is brought up.

agip wrote:

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

When one of you gets your feelings hurt you complain and the mods delete the entire thread.

I'm sure the complainer was our fake naval hero nonequals.

He gets very triggered when his fake service is brought up.

do you ever lighten up?

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Is this Felony No. 88 or No. 89 that is going to bring Trump down? If only I had a penny for every felony Trump committed ....

turns out the DOJ is too terrified of m'aga to prosecute Trump. We're doomed.

agip wrote:

Anyone know why they deleted the Ukraine war thread? ticks me off. I mean why? One thread on the most important development in the world seems valid.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

agip wrote:

do you ever lighten up?

I have no patience for stolen valor.

No one else should either.

Proud Boomer wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

Biden would want to thank the Supreme Court for these rulings if, and only if, he considers his continued employment as POTUS to be more important than a woman's right to choose and student loan bailouts.

I don't disagree with that. Refusal to protect a woman's right to have autonomy over her own body is a huge government over reach.

As far as student loans, I believe removing interest costs from loans, not erasing them, would be a fairer approach. Students who made decisions to work more during school, or went to less expensive colleges or had their parents sacrifice to pay more tuition wouldn't feel like they got the short end of the stick for making responsible decisions.

nonequals wrote:

It's probably been asked before, but I wonder what the average number of replies to a potentially good topic on this website it takes before the conversation starts to go to hell?

3.7? 4.2? Something like that?