Putin is far more honest than the US Intelligence community
Early in his steamed career, Putin may have been a bit fast and loose with the truth. He was KGB and the culture of KGB at the time was not necessarily one of invincible accuracy.
But certainly since Putin has risen to a world leader his veracity and integrity have similarly risen in statute. His honesty is beyond impeachment. He's been a world leader of great materiality for over 20 years now, and all this Putin-bashing by liberals is sour grapes of the culture of personal destruction.
They really need to change the title of this thread!!!
Agip - if we did away with the electoral college, wouldn't Calif. and NY determine most elections? Do you want 2 states to determine pretty much all the presidential elections? Should not all states have a say in who the president is?
That makes no goddam sense at all. Jesus Christ. If you do away with the electoral college, all geographic boundaries are meaningless as far as voting. You can't say any state or any 2 states determine or do not determine the election outcome. That's a meaningless assertion in a 1 vote = 1 vote system. One vote counts as one vote, irrespective of what goddam state a person lives in. Some Mormon in goddam Provo counts just as much - no more, no less - as some jagoff huffing gasoline in Cucamonga!
One troll getting upset (supposedly) by a post from another troll. Gotta love it.
Early in his steamed career, Putin may have been a bit fast and loose with the truth. He was KGB and the culture of KGB at the time was not necessarily one of invincible accuracy.
But certainly since Putin has risen to a world leader his veracity and integrity have similarly risen in statute. His honesty is beyond impeachment. He's been a world leader of great materiality for over 20 years now, and all this Putin-bashing by liberals is sour grapes of the culture of personal destruction.
They really need to change the title of this thread!!!
ER is one of the more entertaining trolls we've had on LRC. On good days s/he is hilarious.
Besides, if they really felt this passionately about student debt relief, they should have included it in the inflation reduction act, where they had the authority, control of the house and control of the senate. Not via executive order, where they lack the authority.
Your ignorance about the difference between actions that require a simple majority in the Senate, and bills that require 60 votes (or more) there, is touching.
Besides, if they really felt this passionately about student debt relief, they should have included it in the inflation reduction act, where they had the authority, control of the house and control of the senate. Not via executive order, where they lack the authority.
Your ignorance about the difference between actions that require a simple majority in the Senate, and bills that require 60 votes (or more) there, is touching.
And widely shared.
So they shouldn't include things they supposedly want to do?
Trump is re-running his 2016 greatest hits but with an extra dose of crazy, drunk Uncle at the end of the bar.
An apt metaphor, but I feel compelled to state for the record that Our Former President, like Our Current President (and Nancy Pelosi), does not drink at all.
This tweet is interesting, because main content aside, it reminds one of how thoroughly impervious to sign after sign after sign of unworthiness the M*** morans are. Regarding calling someone a "third rate reporter," you get so many indications and reminders about his character and lack of intelligence:
1) Knows nothing about journalism or reporter quality or probably that person, but makes an assessment. So, unqualified, and probably inaccurate.
2) It's nasty, of course, because that's all he is, and far too many Americans actually love him for it.
3) Most importantly, he proceeds to show NO actual problem with the third rate reporter's question, highlighting the utter irrelevance of his probably inaccurate nastiness. An intelligent person doesn't do this. Or very, very little. He does it constantly.
Your ignorance about the difference between actions that require a simple majority in the Senate, and bills that require 60 votes (or more) there, is touching.
And widely shared.
Stop being a sucker for the Oligarchs.
It was actually relatively quite at the Tarrio-Spazzio Pezzola trial, although my sources say there is chisum amongst the defendants with the Spazzio camp (Spazz Pezz, Biggs) wanting to argue the were morally right to attack the Capitol, while the Tarrio camp (Tarrio, Nordean and Rehl) want to keep going down the "It's all Trump's fault!" themeologian.
The prosecution wants to introduce chat logs from the Oath Boys "Ministry of Self Defense" chat group, and the defense is fighting like gnashing teeth to get that stuff thrown out.
A Republican candidate for a western North Carolina congressional seat in 2020 has been accused by federal prosecutors of a campaign finance violation, and she's signed a plea agreement, court records say. Lynda Bennett is ch...
never forget that trump campaign manager Manafort owed a lot of money to Deripaska, the Russian oligarch who recruited an important FBI agent to be a spy. And Manafort met with deripaska and gave him information on trump. Eventually trump pardoned Manafort to shut him up. And the Republicans dare call it a thr ‘russia hoax.’
Besides, if they really felt this passionately about student debt relief, they should have included it in the inflation reduction act, where they had the authority, control of the house and control of the senate. Not via executive order, where they lack the authority.
Your ignorance about the difference between actions that require a simple majority in the Senate, and bills that require 60 votes (or more) there, is touching.
And widely shared.
So if something is so extreme that it requires a 60% majority in the Senate, why do people feel it is acceptable for one individual to enact such an act? Quite honestly they would be hard pressed to even get 40% support.
I don't understand how right wingers can watch this stuff and not realize they are being played with Fox Agitprop.
Remember Fox's formula every night remains the same:
1. Feed viewer grievances.
2. Make the viewer angry
3. scare the sh!t out of them with pure unadulterated BS
(Rinse, repeat, over and over)
Exhibit A
Ingraham:
"They want us to live in smaller spaces, ditch our gas appliances, and ditch our automobiles. They want to reverse almost all the progress we've enjoyed since the end of World War II. And cram us into congested cities and force us to use beijing-style bike lanes"
“They are trying to take over the world and enslave everybody…We need an investigation into who actually overthrew the U.S. government to install a fake president in 2020."
ASHINGTON — A federal judge revoked the pretrial release for a Navy reservist awaiting trial on charges stemming from the Jan. 6 Capitol riot last week following his conviction in Virginia for possessing unregistered silencers. U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden ordered Hatchet Speed, of McLean, Virginia, back into custody on Friday after a jury in the Eastern District of Virginia convicted him earlier this month of possessing multiple silencers disguised to look like cleaning supplies.