Steeplecahse WR holder Ruth Jebet Banned for 4 years

In part. The difference is I have provided the real world data I rely on.

physics defiant wrote:

No Gary, it is not settled and you did not win.

Win what?

rekrunner wrote:

physics defiant wrote:

No Gary, it is not settled and you did not win.

Win what?

Exactly.

rekrunner wrote:

physics defiant wrote:

No Gary, it is not settled and you did not win.

Win what?

can you go rek some other thread already gary? your narcissistic attitude is beyond annoying. you didnt settle anything. just because you ramble on more than everyone else doesnt mean you "won" any argument, no most people who are mature enough know that you are a f*cking spoiled brat child and refuse to listen to reason and logic. when people stop engaging with you its not because they are humbled by your brilliance and intelligence, they stop cause they know you wont shut the f*ck up.

you have rekked so many threads and prance around like you won some trophy when people stop posting comments. look this thread is about an EPO ban, it has NOTHING to do with your bullsh*t beliefs ok? so if you could please social distance yourself from LR that would be super baller bro

or gary you have the secret mods delete replies that show you to be a douche bag and then its 10 comments in a row of you boasting and bragging that you "won" then when the person tries to comment they find out that either

a) their handle has been hijacked

b) they cant post comments from the current IP address

so like a typical brat you are protected then brag like you "won".... no you didnt and you never will, EPO works BIG time and only lying pieces of sh*t like you continue the rant that it is just a fallacy to "believe" in. when stablemaster's list finally drops and MORE top kenyans go home devastated you will have to make up more lies and bullsh*t...but really who "believes" you and renato anymore?

bannnedd i got wrote:

can you go rek some other thread already gary? your narcissistic attitude is beyond annoying. you didnt settle anything. just because you ramble on more than everyone else doesnt mean you "won" any argument, no most people who are mature enough know that you are a f*cking spoiled brat child and refuse to listen to reason and logic. when people stop engaging with you its not because they are humbled by your brilliance and intelligence, they stop cause they know you wont shut the f*ck up.

you have rekked so many threads and prance around like you won some trophy when people stop posting comments. look this thread is about an EPO ban, it has NOTHING to do with your bullsh*t beliefs ok? so if you could please social distance yourself from LR that would be super baller bro

You want me to "rek" other threads? Are you sure?

I did not mean to say *I* settled the matter, but that Armstronglivs' (and "physics defiant") explicit refusals effectively settle the matter. Apparently you three disagree and would like to continue the discussion -- I'm fine with that too.

I did not come into this thread preaching any of my beliefs, but after being trolled several times, simply asked Armstronglivs to meet a standard he accused me of not meeting. 15 pages later, here we are still at square zero. I find it oddly amusing, because we started out both agreeing that athletes believe doping works, but for some reason he backtracked when I said I agreed with him.

I do not feel like I won or lost anything, except the continued right to call unfounded views beliefs.

rekrunner wrote:

In part. The difference is I have provided the real world data I rely on.

You could more credibly claim that you are Napoleon.

Yours we can call delusions.

There's all sorts of proof above, you just deny it. Explicit refusals to repeat that info, not provide it initially. It's all there.

Well then it is settled, isn't it.

rekrunner wrote:

Well then it is settled, isn't it.

This thread was about a doper being caught and banned. Yes, that's been settled.

rekrunner wrote:

Well then it is settled, isn't it.

That no one sees anything credible in your arguments. Yeah, that's settled.

That is new -- we settled that everyone was blind?

rekrunner wrote:

That is new -- we settled that everyone was blind?

no we have all settled that your a delusional self righteous narcissistic douche bag...again this thread is about a doped up kenyan runner busted for EPO is BANNED....somehow you like always think its about you....but thats what narcissist do, they make everything about themselves

no can you kindly go social distance yourself from further postings you annoying f*ck

thanks

rekrunner wrote:

That is new -- we settled that everyone was blind?

If by everyone you mean you, Jon and Renato, then yes.

physics defiant wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

That is new -- we settled that everyone was blind?

If by everyone you mean you, Jon and Renato, then yes.

well i bett there is 4% that still "believe" gary, but that data is hard to actually digest

physics defiant wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

That is new -- we settled that everyone was blind?

If by everyone you mean you, Jon and Renato, then yes.

So everyone else can see my arguments are credible?

I think you and Armstronglivs should get together and get your story straight, as it seems far from settled.

rekrunner wrote:

physics defiant wrote:

If by everyone you mean you, Jon and Renato, then yes.

So everyone else can see my arguments are credible?

I think you and Armstronglivs should get together and get your story straight, as it seems far from settled.

If by else you mean Jon and Renato, then yes.

Well, I guess it's settled then. We are blind and yet we can see.