Can you imagine believing Russia has has 12 generals killed in this campaign!
From 2014:
Maj Gen Harold Greene, killed by an Afghan soldier in an insider attack, follows a long line of US generals killed in war. And their deaths say much about the changing nature of warfare. In the past decade, thousands of American soldiers have lost their lives to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet news this week of Maj Gen Harold Greene's death made headlines. Gen Greene is not only the highest ranking US military official to have been killed since the start of the war in Afghanistan, his death also marks the first time in more than 40 years that a general has been killed in combat.
Here ya go... 12 Russian generals During its war in Ukraine, Russia's top military leadership has proven to be particularly vulnerable, experts say. Ukraine's Ministry of Defense has claimed that 12 Russian generals have been killed since the invasion began in late February.1 day ago
The key being "..Ukraine's Ministry of Defense has claimed.."
You take that as fact?
Does not bother you that generals almost never are in situations to be killed in action?
40 years between it happening to American generals
Carmine If you believe that all of the media outlets are lying, why don’t you make formal complaints about it, instead of wasting your time on a running website. Surely there are websites dedicated to truth in the media, and you can even post in the chats under the articles you think contain lies.
If I truly believed the governments and media of all the NATO nations were perpetrating this massive lie, I wouldn’t direct my misgivings about it on a running website. Only an idiot would do that.
Carmine If you believe that all of the media outlets are lying, why don’t you make formal complaints about it, instead of wasting your time on a running website. Surely there are websites dedicated to truth in the media, and you can even post in the chats under the articles you think contain lies.
If I truly believed the governments and media of all the NATO nations were perpetrating this massive lie, I wouldn’t direct my misgivings about it on a running website. Only an idiot would do that.
Russian, Chinese, Brazilian, Pakistani, Iranian, and indian media is telling a different story compared to NATO. Do you really think the countries that have more clout and population than all of NATO are lying? Do you really think the countries there are perpetrating in some massive lie? You may be an idiot to think so.
It was pretty much in the same ballpark of the US invading other countries.
1. See an opportunity
2. Invent a pretext to invade
3. Invade
4. Profit???
Another pro-Russia troll that can’t actually answer a simple question. Or, is that a “No. Russia was wrong to invade Ukraine and should not have.” disguised as “But ‘merica did it too!”
quick direct your outrage at Indian media for “biased” reporting on the war, stating
“Mr. Putin must have expected a quick victory. But Ukraine’s resistance did not only deny the Russians this but also galvanised western support. When western financial and military aid hardened the Ukrainian resistance, the Russian troops, despite their incremental territorial gains in eastern and southern Ukraine, appeared to have got stuck in the battlefield.”
”Russia cannot ask for dialogue and peace when continuing to pound Ukrainian cities. Its war machine has slowed down and it is already facing economic and political isolation in Europe.”
Europe News: Washington has provided to Ukraine details on Russia's expected troop movements and the location and other details about Russia's mobile military head
To those who doubt the accuracy of media reporting on the war in Ukraine, you are wasting your time posting on a running website. If you truly believe the reporting to be full of lies, you should direct your efforts to these organizations that actually will investigate your claims:
Thats the kind of question special needs children like lavrovthemoney/moardeadruskies think is a good question. The adults meanwhile are asking the kind of questions Greenwald is asking.
Thats the kind of question special needs children like lavrovthemoney/moardeadruskies think is a good question. The adults meanwhile are asking the kind of questions Greenwald is asking.
I'm not going to watch the video because you didn't bother to comment on what's in it, but the answer to the video lede "which Americans benefit?" is that every America who supports Ukraine defending itself from Russian invaders and killers benefits. That's about 90% of Americans benefitting through the decisions of their elected leaders (on a very public issue). And actually it's probably closer to 99%, given that those in the small minority supporting Russia's invasion and opposing Ukraine either aren't bright enough or are too jaded by fringe politics to understand that they benefit as well.
Complete BS. As if we already don't know India is closer to Russia in this Russia vs NATO war. Plenty of opposing, and more truthful articles being published in India ..
Russia-Ukraine war news: In an exclusive interview with India Today, Eduard Aleksandrovich Basurin, the official representative of the Donetsk region, said that the West would target India after it destroys Russia. Here are t...
Complete BS. As if we already don't know India is closer to Russia in this Russia vs NATO war. Plenty of opposing, and more truthful articles being published in India ..
That is unintentionally hysterical. Are we to believe that Eduard Aleksandrovich Basurin is an expert in the West's attitude towards India? It is more plausible that he told the reporter from India was next just to try and build sympathy for Russia. If a reporter from Pakistan calls, he will say that Pakistan is next. If South Africa, then South Africa will be the purported target. The West has no need to destroy India, and no reason to move against India. A strong India on China's southern border helps the West.
Complete BS. As if we already don't know India is closer to Russia in this Russia vs NATO war. Plenty of opposing, and more truthful articles being published in India ..
You've posted an interview that happens to be given to an Indian news source by Eduard Basurin (who I doubt talks to Western media) that says nothing we haven't heard except this demented lede that the West is going to destroy India after it destroys Russia ("India will be next"). That's a pretty insane prediction, even by your standards, which is probably why no Western media bothered to report it. I doubt you even believe it. Do you? Do you think NATO is going to attack India?
That silly statement aside, Eduard Basurin gets plenty of Western coverage. He is the Donetsk representative who, on Russian TV, called for Russia to use chemical weapons in Mariupol.
Yes, I agree that the Indian reporter actually recorded what the Russian said. So what’s your point. The reporter pressed him about war crimes committed, and the Russian guy refused to answer.
IT: We still need a direct answer on the accusations of war crimes committed by your forces and the Russian forces.
EB: I decline to respond. Why should I prove my innocence to someone when it is true. I am scared there will be more bloodshed in the future. There are accusations of using chemical and biological weapons. Should we keep explaining ourselves? It is simpler to go there and expose the lies. We will go in and bring foreign journalists to show them the truth. We should respect ourselves.
