Note that no 'conservative' on this board has said a single condemning word about Trump, a former president and leader of the 'conservative' party demanding the end of American Constitutional order.
But they have a lot to say about Hunter Biden's private parts and whether they should be public information.
And throw that in their face whenever they argue anything.
Only the dumbest people alive think the Hunter Biden laptop story has anything to do with Hunter's sex addiction.
Conservative morans and rubes, remember to focus on Hunter Biden and not that a former 'conservative' president lied to hide debts owed to foreign nations. Do what the right wing media tells you to do!
Hunter Biden! Focus!!!!!
Donald Trump’s business attracted so much scrutiny during his time in office that it would be easy to conclude that all information about its foreign entanglements must be out by now. It is not. Buried in a heap of recently released financial paperwork sits a surprising revelation: Donald Trump had a foreign creditor he failed to disclose while running for president in 2016 and after assuming office in 2017.
The documents, compiled by the Trump Organization and obtained by the New York attorney general, show a previously unreported liability of $19.8 million listed as “L/P Daewoo.” The debt stems from an agreement Trump struck to share some of his licensing fees with Daewoo, a South Korean conglomerate that partnered with Trump on a project near the United Nations headquarters in New York City.
Conservative morans and rubes, remember to focus on Hunter Biden and not that a former 'conservative' president lied to hide debts owed to foreign nations. Do what the right wing media tells you to do!
Hunter Biden! Focus!!!!!
Donald Trump’s business attracted so much scrutiny during his time in office that it would be easy to conclude that all information about its foreign entanglements must be out by now. It is not. Buried in a heap of recently released financial paperwork sits a surprising revelation: Donald Trump had a foreign creditor he failed to disclose while running for president in 2016 and after assuming office in 2017.
The documents, compiled by the Trump Organization and obtained by the New York attorney general, show a previously unreported liability of $19.8 million listed as “L/P Daewoo.” The debt stems from an agreement Trump struck to share some of his licensing fees with Daewoo, a South Korean conglomerate that partnered with Trump on a project near the United Nations headquarters in New York City.
LOL!
Trump has a a legitimate business deal with a South Korean company and you're outraged.
Biden is wh*ring himself out to communist China and you bury your empty head in the sand.
Note that no 'conservative' on this board has said a single condemning word about Trump, a former president and leader of the 'conservative' party demanding the end of American Constitutional order.
But they have a lot to say about Hunter Biden's private parts and whether they should be public information.
And throw that in their face whenever they argue anything.
Trump took the following oath upon taking office in 2016. Every president is required to do so.
I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Note that no 'conservative' on this board has said a single condemning word about Trump, a former president and leader of the 'conservative' party demanding the end of American Constitutional order.
But they have a lot to say about Hunter Biden's private parts and whether they should be public information.
And throw that in their face whenever they argue anything.
Trump took the following oath upon taking office in 2016. Every president is required to do so.
I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
80 million people will probably vote for trump to be president in 2024, even after he has recommended eliminating the Constitution and installing himself as supreme kommander.
Is this really how we are going to do this, America?
Note that no 'conservative' on this board has said a single condemning word about Trump, a former president and leader of the 'conservative' party demanding the end of American Constitutional order.
Because this isn't the Trump thread, it's the Biden thread.
Have you said a word about Biden's disregard of the Constitution?
Note that no 'conservative' on this board has said a single condemning word about Trump, a former president and leader of the 'conservative' party demanding the end of American Constitutional order.
Because this isn't the Trump thread, it's the Biden thread.
Have you said a word about Biden's disregard of the Constitution?
Take a moral stand, Hardloper. Stand up and make distinctions.
Say that it's different when a former president, current presidential nominee and leader of a political party advocates for voiding the Constitution or sends an armed mob to sack congress vs I dunno trying to eliminate some student debt.
Take a moral stand, Hardloper. Stand up and make distinctions.
Say that it's different when a former president, current presidential nominee and leader of a political party advocates for voiding the Constitution or sends an armed mob to sack congress vs I dunno trying to eliminate some student debt.
Can't you do that? If not, why not?
Because this is the Biden thread, not the Trump thread. And I'm more concerned about the guy actually in office than the guy making up clown conspiracies that will never happen.
Note that no 'conservative' on this board has said a single condemning word about Trump, a former president and leader of the 'conservative' party demanding the end of American Constitutional order.
Because this isn't the Trump thread, it's the Biden thread.
Have you said a word about Biden's disregard of the Constitution?
Yeah, remember when Biden told Harris to disregard the votes and declare him the winner of next presidential election?
Take a moral stand, Hardloper. Stand up and make distinctions.
Say that it's different when a former president, current presidential nominee and leader of a political massivparty advocates for voiding the Constitution or sends an armed mob to sack congress vs I dunno trying to eliminate some student debt.
Can't you do that? If not, why not?
Because this is the Biden thread, not the Trump thread. And I'm more concerned about the guy actually in office than the guy making up clown conspiracies that will never happen.
Because this is the Biden thread, not the Trump thread. And I'm more concerned about the guy actually in office than the guy making up clown conspiracies that will never happen.
massive moral and citizenship fail.
I don't have to answer for someone I didn't vote for and who isn't President and who isn't the subject of this thread. At least not in this thread.
Why don't you guys ever criticize Biden's ridiculous approach to the constitution or the republic's checks and balances?
I don't have to answer for someone I didn't vote for and who isn't President and who isn't the subject of this thread. At least not in this thread.
Why don't you guys ever criticize Biden's ridiculous approach to the constitution or the republic's checks and balances?
you should openly condemn those who favor the destruction of democracy and the US Constitution. I don't see why this is a hard lift for anyone who believes in democracy and has a spine. But you say to do so on the wrong thread would be be an affront to you. So weak.
The 'biden thread' excuse is so weak. I mean come on. It's a crutch, and excuse, a soft puddle of weak spine. Are you condemning trump for this on the trump thread? Just curious.
Biden has worked in gray areas a couple of times to try to help people. When courts tell him to stop he stops. The courts have the job of deciding cases in gray areas. That's one of the things they do. There are many, many gray areas in US gummint. Eliminating the Constitution is not one of them.
Trump doesnt' work in the gray areas - he wants to toss out everything and make himself dictator. he has used armed mobs, he has used violence to overthrow our democracy. You call it conspiracy when it has been an armed coup on many fronts.
I don't have to answer for someone I didn't vote for and who isn't President and who isn't the subject of this thread. At least not in this thread.
Why don't you guys ever criticize Biden's ridiculous approach to the constitution or the republic's checks and balances?
you should openly condemn those who favor the destruction of democracy and the US Constitution. I don't see why this is a hard lift for anyone who believes in democracy and has a spine. But you say to do so on the wrong thread would be be an affront to you. So weak.
The 'biden thread' excuse is so weak. I mean come on. It's a crutch, and excuse, a soft puddle of weak spine. Are you condemning trump for this on the trump thread? Just curious.
Biden has worked in gray areas a couple of times to try to help people. When courts tell him to stop he stops. The courts have the job of deciding cases in gray areas. That's one of the things they do. There are many, many gray areas in US gummint. Eliminating the Constitution is not one of them.
Trump doesnt' work in the gray areas - he wants to toss out everything and make himself dictator. he has used armed mobs, he has used violence to overthrow our democracy. You call it conspiracy when it has been an armed coup on many fronts.
Biden doesn't work in the gray area. For example, he was told by the courts that extending the eviction moratorium was illegal without an act of congress, and he went ahead and did it anyway. (BTW, I also criticize Trump for starting this policy, but I don't think he would have continued it after the court told him to stop unlike Biden.) He was told by his Education Department that his student loan payoff was unconstitutional, but he did it anyway. He even set up a website to try to start the process of disbursing payments knowing it would get shut down. This is black-and-white. Furthermore, even if it were constitutional, it's ridiculous to even think a President should create trillion dollar programs without any act of congress, and totally contrary to our system of checks and balances. And Democrat leadership was pretty open about wanting to expand the court in order to get a majority to approve this stuff. Trump wanting to overturn the entire Constitution is MUCH worse, but it's also incoherent, and there's no mechanism to make it happen, and ironically Trump's own judicial nominees would prevent it, just like they ruled against many of his overreaches. Whereas the Democrat judicial appointees have reliably voted in favor of their executive power grabs.
you should openly condemn those who favor the destruction of democracy and the US Constitution. I don't see why this is a hard lift for anyone who believes in democracy and has a spine. But you say to do so on the wrong thread would be be an affront to you. So weak.
The 'biden thread' excuse is so weak. I mean come on. It's a crutch, and excuse, a soft puddle of weak spine. Are you condemning trump for this on the trump thread? Just curious.
Biden has worked in gray areas a couple of times to try to help people. When courts tell him to stop he stops. The courts have the job of deciding cases in gray areas. That's one of the things they do. There are many, many gray areas in US gummint. Eliminating the Constitution is not one of them.
Trump doesnt' work in the gray areas - he wants to toss out everything and make himself dictator. he has used armed mobs, he has used violence to overthrow our democracy. You call it conspiracy when it has been an armed coup on many fronts.
Biden doesn't work in the gray area. For example, he was told by the courts that extending the eviction moratorium was illegal without an act of congress, and he went ahead and did it anyway. (BTW, I also criticize Trump for starting this policy, but I don't think he would have continued it after the court told him to stop unlike Biden.) He was told by his Education Department that his student loan payoff was unconstitutional, but he did it anyway. He even set up a website to try to start the process of disbursing payments knowing it would get shut down. This is black-and-white. Furthermore, even if it were constitutional, it's ridiculous to even think a President should create trillion dollar programs without any act of congress, and totally contrary to our system of checks and balances. And Democrat leadership was pretty open about wanting to expand the court in order to get a majority to approve this stuff. Trump wanting to overturn the entire Constitution is MUCH worse, but it's also incoherent, and there's no mechanism to make it happen, and ironically Trump's own judicial nominees would prevent it, just like they ruled against many of his overreaches. Whereas the Democrat judicial appointees have reliably voted in favor of their executive power grabs.
kudos for saying trump is much worse than biden.
On the eviction moratorium, biden says he was told it was close constitutionally. Which is pretty much the definition of a gray area. I think you are exaggerating how clear cut that was. From what I can tell, this is how the system is supposed to work. If there is a gray area, you rely on courts to make the final thumbs up and thumbs down. Which the Biden Admin did. Not a problem.
But sure, I'll say that congress should do this kind of work, not the exec branch.
Forbes:
Asked by reporters at the White House if he believes the moratorium is constitutional, Biden replied, “I think it is,” though he added that he “can’t guarantee” the Supreme Court won’t strike it down. Biden said he consulted with constitutional scholars and that there was a “split,” but that the consensus of the scholars he has consulted the most was, “‘We think you have the authority... but, in this court, who knows?’"
One of the scholars who spurred the administration’s reversal from doubting the legality of extending the moratorium last week to issuing a new one on Friday was Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe, who has been vocal in his belief about its constitutionality, according to the Washington Post.
"I think it is," Biden said of its constitutionality, adding that scholars told him, “We think you have the authority... but, in this court, who knows?"
