agip wrote:
for the record, it's looking like Gaetz was a sugar daddy, with money channeled through Greenberg, but is there a minor involved? Not clear.
So he'll have to answer the question about whether the women were 'girlfriends' or 'sugar babies' or 'prostitutes.'
Obviously these lines are gray and people work on a spectrum.
Unless one of the girls was underage - then he's got serious legal problems.
But I suspect this will fade away with no clear definition of what these girls were, exactly.
Not great for his electoral hopes though, I'm sure.
It's hard to conclude that Gaetz was not at least involved in prostitution. He clearly gave money to girls he didn't know in exchange for sex. And that's just based on the public evidence (as long as that evidence is reliable).
But yeah, I don't think we know yet if he is guilty of trafficking a minor.