The real conspiracy isn't that about Neil Armstrong, it's about the COVERUP of Soviet cosmonauts GETTING THERE FIRST, but of course USA media propaganda never covers this.
The real conspiracy isn't that about Neil Armstrong, it's about the COVERUP of Soviet cosmonauts GETTING THERE FIRST, but of course USA media propaganda never covers this.
#1 The Duplicate Backdrop
#2 The Layered Cross-hairs
#3 The “C” Rock
#4 Lack of Stars
#5 Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables
#6 The Unexplained Object
#7 The Van Allen Radiation Belt
#8 Multiple Light Sources
#9 Lack of Impact Crater
#10 The Waving Flag
http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/
So, you admit that you can provide ZERO evidence that humans ever stepped foot on the moon. Forgive me for being not overly impressed with that compelling argument. (SMH)[/quote]
Where did I claim they stepped on the moon? I was merely trying to establish the parameters of what you would consider acceptable evidence. Can you elaborate?
And you never answered my question. Has NASA ever launched a unmanned or manned flight into space? Yes or no. No, I can't provide evidence, I'm just asking your opinion.
0/10 so far wrote:
#1 The Duplicate Backdrop
#2 The Layered Cross-hairs
#3 The “C” Rock
#4 Lack of Stars
#5 Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables
#6 The Unexplained Object
#7 The Van Allen Radiation Belt
#8 Multiple Light Sources
#9 Lack of Impact Crater
#10 The Waving Flag
http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/
Really? You just bumped everything that's already been debunked earlier in this thread. Nice try.
The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown below clearly have identical backdrops, despite being "officially" listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart!! One photo even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and "disappear" in another? Clearly, most viable clarity is NASA simply re-used the same backdrop prop when filming different scenes of their purported moon landing videos...
http://listverse.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/aulishite-1.jpgNASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to the human eye. Despite this, to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly false.
The cameras purportedly used by astronauts during the "moon landings" had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however, clearly show the cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that photographs have been edited or doctored after being taken!!
The photograph shown below is NOT an isolated occurrence. Many objects are shown to be in front of the cross-hairs, including the American flag in one picture and the lunar rover in another.
NASA believers turn around and ask: if we were to hoax the pictures, why use the "cross-hairs" in the first place!
Well duh, if you DIDN'T (use xhairs) then everyone would wonder how you scaled and directed the photography...
http://listverse.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/sibrel_crosshair.jpg
One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be the letter “C” engraved into it. The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be a natural occurrence. Likely the rock is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by a film crew. For instance, a set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to the camera.
NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter ("C"), on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.
Yes, and Alger Hiss doesn't know how Whittaker Chambers used his typewriter...gimme a break all ready
The joke is that NASA practically has no answer!
http://listverse.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/c-rock-actual-c.jpgNASA believers it is time to wake up. We never landed on the moon. Deal with it.
OneGiantLie
perfectly symmetrical stray hair (practical joke) wrote:
One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be the letter “C” engraved into it. The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be a natural occurrence.
Likely the rock is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by a film crew. For instance, a set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to the camera.
NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter ("C"), on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.
Yes, and Alger Hiss doesn't know how Whittaker Chambers used his typewriter...gimme a break all ready
The joke is that NASA practically has no answer!
http://listverse.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/c-rock-actual-c.jpg
That BS is so old and already explained. That is a reprint with a hair or something. The original photo does not have a "c" on that rock.
I think you are just trolling. So my real question is why do you get off on thinking you are misinforming people? Do you like to think you have an effect on making people stupid?
Science bro wrote:
NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter ("C"), on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.
That BS is so old and already explained. That is a reprint with a hair or something. The original photo does not have a "c" on that rock.
[/quote]
This is doubly incriminating!
WHY did NASA not just say "oh that's a smudged(?) reprint, here's the original"... INSTEAD they invented TWO (2) cover-up theories for their malady BEFORE palming the "original" (could just as well be the doctored one) off on USA public. How can you even keep track of all the lying diversions??
Yet, for the anti-hoax believers, it only serves to strengthen the belief system......
An excerpt from Wagging the Moondoggie, Part I
Anyway, a whole lot of people are extremely reluctant to give up their belief in the success of the Apollo missions. A lot of people, in fact, pretty much shut down at the mere mention of the Moon landings being faked, refusing to even consider the possibility (Facebook, by the way, is definitely not the best place to promote the notion that the landings were faked, in case anyone was wondering). And yet there are some among the True Believers who will allow that, though they firmly believe that we did indeed land on the Moon, they would have understood if it had been a hoax. Given the climate of the times, with Cold War tensions simmering and anxious Americans looking for some sign that their country was still dominant and not technologically inferior to the Soviets, it could be excused if NASA had duped the world.
Such sentiments made me realize that the Moon landing lie is somewhat unique among the big lies told to the American people in that it was, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively benign lie, and one that could be easily spun. Admitting that the landings were faked would not have nearly the same impact as, say, admitting to mass murdering 3,000 Americans and destroying billions of dollars worth of real estate and then using that crime as a pretext to wage two illegal wars and strip away civil, legal and privacy rights.
And yet, despite the fact that it was a relatively benign lie, there is a tremendous reluctance among the American people to let go of the notion that we sent men to the Moon. There are a couple of reasons for that, one of them being that there is a romanticized notion that those were great years – years when one was proud to be an American. And in this day and age, people need that kind of romanticized nostalgia to cling to.
But that is not the main reason that people cling so tenaciously, often even angrily, to what is essentially the adult version of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. What primarily motivates them is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive? What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community, and all the other institutions we depend on to tell us the truth? What does that say about the very nature of the world we live in?
In 2001 Steve Troy of Lunaranomalies.com undertook a lengthy investigation. After obtaining transparencies from different sources connected with NASA, he failed to see the mark either on the masters used prior to 1997 or on the new masters. Yet the photos on official NASA web sites clearly show it.
When official NASA site puts out the letter 'C', and proceeds then berates "conspiracy theorists" for laughing their arse off, what can you expect from sensible quarters?
Plus, how many "new masters" have there been, which of them had the 'C' label before editting occurred? NASA is not known for acknowledging a chain of custody for their goods....
Legit, you say the Earth is flat and your eveidence is conspiracy blogs. If you believe what you say, you have no concept of physics, the Earth the moon, space, the solar system, etc. How does a rocket take off from the flat Earth? Did cosmonauts see the flat Earth from their Soyuz capsules?
Science bro wrote:
But nice try wrote:
Just because the belts bear his name, doesn't mean his opinion counts more.
So you are irrelevant in this.
Ha! Ok, the expert scientist's opinion that made the discovery doesn't count, but your opinion and that of conspiracy bloggers does.
Ha! Ha! Ha! That's really the best post in this whole thread! That's great thanks!
This really was great! I should frame this post.
Been fun. Have a good night everyone.
Science bro wrote:
Legit, you say the Earth is flat and your eveidence is conspiracy blogs. If you believe what you say, you have no concept of physics, the Earth the moon, space, the solar system, etc. How does a rocket take off from the flat Earth? Did cosmonauts see the flat Earth from their Soyuz capsules?
My evidence comes from the laws of physics being broken as in sound being heard in a vacuum and instantaneous 2way radio communication over 230K miles away. The earth curve calculator continuously fails when experiments with lasers, high powered cameras and infrared tests have been performed.
You continue to stay indoctrinated, remain duped, trust the distortion in fisheye lenses and rely on CGI images from Google.
OneGiantLie
load of crock wrote:
In 2001 Steve Troy of Lunaranomalies.com undertook a lengthy investigation. After obtaining transparencies from different sources connected with NASA, he failed to see the mark either on the masters used prior to 1997 or on the new masters. Yet the photos on official NASA web sites clearly show it.
When official NASA site puts out the letter 'C', and proceeds then berates "conspiracy theorists" for laughing their arse off, what can you expect from sensible quarters?
Plus, how many "new masters" have there been, which of them had the 'C' label before editting occurred? NASA is not known for acknowledging a chain of custody for their goods....
Such denial + cover-up only serves to redouble (4x) the unswerving natureness of anti-hoax believers.
Repeatedly changing the story over the years when contradicted, aptly called CULT "science"
Their quasi-deity NASA has spoken, who cares what the oracle belied before?
What is the most significant hoax of all time, perpetrated by "official" sources (US government, etc.), that was once nearly universally accepted but was eventually exposed and it is now nearly universally accepted that it was a hoax?
Q 4 U wrote:
What is the most significant hoax of all time, perpetrated by "official" sources (US government, etc.), that was once nearly universally accepted but was eventually exposed and it is now nearly universally accepted that it was a hoax?
Go Stephen.
its ok wrote:
Q 4 U wrote:
What is the most significant hoax of all time, perpetrated by "official" sources (US government, etc.), that was once nearly universally accepted but was eventually exposed and it is now nearly universally accepted that it was a hoax?
Go Stephen.
EPO doesn’t work
m!ndweak wrote:
its ok wrote:
Go Stephen.
EPO doesn’t work
So, nobody has any ideas?
