Funny you mention Bob Kraft. Another sex trafficker that Trump used to hang out with. They were long time friends. Kraft even gifted Trump a Super Bowl Ring.
The answer, by the way, is nothing happened to Kraft. Despite being caught red handed. Twice.
Meanwhile Gaetz was accused, investigate, and not indicted, And this is your "proof" of his guilt.
Lol I don’t need a court to tell me pedophiles are bad
You moron you don’t even know the definition of the word pedophile. Having sex with a 17 year old ain’t it. There are many states in the country where that’s not below the age of consent.
“New York The age of consent is 17 years old. This means that anyone under 17 is legally unable to consent to sexual activity. Engaging in sexual activity with a minor can result in statutory rape charges.”
He’s going to get confirmed and losers like you will do nothing except the b!tch about it.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
This scumbag Greenberg, who was once great friends with Gaetz (they were "bros"), signed a written confession that he used to organize escorts for Gaetz's including the 17 year old. They have a bunch of other documentary evidence too - receipts, texts, emails, etc. - showing Gaetz was at all these creepy sex sessions with the escorts.
That's why the House was investigating him. Not because "He is not an establishment figure" whatever the fvck that even means.
Greenberg signed a written confession. Not Gaetz. See the difference?
You can assume I do see the difference, since I'm the one that posted that fact ("Greenberg, who was once great friends with Gaetz (they were "bros"), signed a written confession").
You need me to explain how Gaetz and these other young GOPer loyal to Trump and not the establishment wing of the GOP is not an establishment figure?
No. I need you to explain what your labeling of Gaetz as non-establishment has to do with the facts I set forth in the post you are responding to. I provided some facts and reasons that the House is investigating Gaetz. You tossed out a tired label as used it as a conclusion. It's like you're a child or a retard or something.
By the way, whatever happened to Bob Kraft after he was caught buying sex from women trafficked from Asia?
You and your endless use of the rhetorical question. You just can't understand what a joke you are.
I have no clue what happened to Bob Kraft and his hookers, nor do I care, and nor do I have any idea what that has to do with Gaetz. But YOU apparently DO know those things, yet are incapable of spitting them out. Why can't you just affirmatively fvcking state the answer to your stupid question and advance things? I'm asking that rhetorically.
Listen libs..YOU LOST.....Trump won and can employ anyone he wants...If you don't like it. Tough chit...
Yes, and unlike Dump and right wingers, libs accept that without having childish tantrums and molesting democracy. Doesn't change the fact that chitty picks for AG are chitty picks for AG; wanting to own the libs makes for some very strange decision-making =)
Listen libs..YOU LOST.....Trump won and can employ anyone he wants...If you don't like it. Tough chit...
Yes, and unlike Dump and right wingers, libs accept that without having childish tantrums and molesting democracy. Doesn't change the fact that chitty picks for AG are chitty picks for AG; wanting to own the libs makes for some very strange decision-making =)
Not at all. Democrats weaponized the justice system against republicans and trump for 4 years. Time to taste your own medicine soon
You are moving the goalposts. In your post to which I responded you said that they the lack of prosecution indicated that they had no evidence. I pointed out that you are wrong (if nothing else, the testimony of his buddy is evidence). Some of the other evidence was noted in press reports several years ago. I noted that the DOJ probably did not think the evidence conclusive enough to meet their standard for bringing a case. Yet you answer as if I suggested the evidence was "solid". And I'm not repeatedly calling him a ped here. If you want to respond to me, respond relating to what I wrote, not what you want to pretend I wrote. If you want to dispute those calling him a ped, then respond to them.
Then you agree there was not strong enuff evidence to indict him.
Are you mentally challenged? I clearly wrote that the evidence did not meet the DOJ's high bar for pursuing prosecution, particularly against a public figure. That's all I can agree to. If I saw all the evidence would I say it was strong enough to indict? I don't know, but the answer could well be yes and still not meet the DOJ's standard. As I have written several times, the DOJ doesn't want to proceed just because they have enough evidence to indict, they want enough evidence to make a conviction highly likely.
Yes, and unlike Dump and right wingers, libs accept that without having childish tantrums and molesting democracy. Doesn't change the fact that chitty picks for AG are chitty picks for AG; wanting to own the libs makes for some very strange decision-making =)
Not at all. Democrats weaponized the justice system against republicans and trump for 4 years. Time to taste your own medicine soon
Yes, and unlike Dump and right wingers, libs accept that without having childish tantrums and molesting democracy. Doesn't change the fact that chitty picks for AG are chitty picks for AG; wanting to own the libs makes for some very strange decision-making =)
Not at all. Democrats weaponized the justice system against republicans and trump for 4 years. Time to taste your own medicine soon
So, you aren't against it at all.
We vigorously encourage the imprisonment of those who so pathetically attempted to incriminate Donald. Leticia James, Alvin DM2 Bragg, Jack Smith.... they can all rot for the rest of their worthless lives.
In case you are slow on the uptake, the reason that the Trump administration can’t find real, professional people with professional integrity on the top of their fields of expertise is because no one would ever be willing to go through what happened to Trumps last staff and administration.
Most of Trumps last staff have criminal indictments or sentences or they have been demonized with death threats for being loyal to the law and constitution.
This isn’t hard to figure out
He nominated a real professional (Bill McGinley) as the White House Counsel.
And I don't think Don McGahn and Pat Cipollone have been demonized with death threats.
In case you are slow on the uptake, the reason that the Trump administration can’t find real, professional people with professional integrity on the top of their fields of expertise is because no one would ever be willing to go through what happened to Trumps last staff and administration.
Most of Trumps last staff have criminal indictments or sentences or they have been demonized with death threats for being loyal to the law and constitution.
This isn’t hard to figure out
Gonna have to disagree with that one.
It may well be true that "real, professional people with professional integrity on the top of their fields of expertise" would not be willing to join Trump's staff.
However, that is entirely irrelevant, as Trump has absolutely no interest in such people for his staff - so they would never come under consideration in the first place.
Listen libs..YOU LOST.....Trump won and can employ anyone he wants...If you don't like it. Tough chit...
Well, that's the beauty of it. Now that Trumpers got what they wanted, us never-Trumpers can spend the next four years picking at every stupid thing he does. And there's going to be a LOT of those things. Already this week, he flubbed a phone call with Putin so bad that Putin denied it happened, then directed Russian state TV to air naked photos of Melania Trump. I mean, you can't make this stuff up. There's already high-level incompetence on display, imagine how much worse it will get when his "cabinet" is in place!