History has proven repeatedly that giving corrupt, narcissist men power is a bad idea. But many in this country (myself included) naively assumed that the US had sufficient checks and balances to where one individual could not rip down this nation's form of government.
Many thought it would be a hoot to put the reality TV, fake billionaire, clown show carnival barker in the oval office. What is the worse that can happen?
It doesn't even matter, because you probablyhave some canned response at the ready to counter anything that invalidates or threatens your worldview. I'm sure you'd just say the people testifying are just RINO shills paid by the Clintons or the NWO or the Jews or something
I do know that an event where the only person killed was a protester was not violent insurrection.
I know only the naive don't know that the Proud Boys are filthy with FBI agents.
I know that violent insurrectionists don't get into the Capitol Bldg and take selfies and sit in chairs.
I do know there is no bigger liar than Adam Schiff.
If you'd pay attention you would know that the hearings are framing Jan 6 events as the culmination of a months long attempt to overthrow the 2020 election; the hearings aren't just about what happened on that particular day. Even if the attack on the Capitol was just people "taking selfies and sitting in chairs,"which it wasn't, it's almost besides the point.
A very good case is being made that your boy Trump knowingly tried to overthrow an election that he and those around him knew he lost.
Two Georgia election workers filed a defamation lawsuit against One America News Network (OAN) after the news channel accused them of committing voter fraud to change the outcome of the presidential election in Georgia.
If you'd pay attention you would know that the hearings are framing Jan 6 events as the culmination of a months long attempt to overthrow the 2020 election; the hearings aren't just about what happened on that particular day. Even if the attack on the Capitol was just people "taking selfies and sitting in chairs,"which it wasn't, it's almost besides the point.
A very good case is being made that your boy Trump knowingly tried to overthrow an election that he and those around him knew he lost.
Aided by OAN and others repeating dangerous lies that they knew were dangerous lies.
The vote counting in PA, MI, and Wisc in the days following the 2020 election was almost certainly where and how the election was stolen.
How did they do the vote stealing in those three states? Do we know the names of some or all involved?
Do we have their emails or texts? You can't even rob a 7-11 without a few texts in this day and age. We need to get the emails and texts related to vote stealing in PA, MI and Wisc.
Aided by OAN and others repeating dangerous lies that they knew were dangerous lies.
A dangerous lie is WMDs and starting a two decade war on that lie.
Correct. Practically nobody disagrees with you on this. It's also entirely irrelevant to the matter at hand and doesn't make OAN's deliberate spreading of disinformation okay. You can't just change the topic when you're squirming in a corner after all your arguments get wrecked.
The vote counting in PA, MI, and Wisc in the days following the 2020 election was almost certainly where and how the election was stolen.
How did they do the vote stealing in those three states? Do we know the names of some or all involved?
Do we have their emails or texts? You can't even rob a 7-11 without a few texts in this day and age. We need to get the emails and texts related to vote stealing in PA, MI and Wisc.
No idea.
But I watched the change in the vote totals in those states from the morning after the election thru the following days and the % that went to Biden was not possible.
The votes don't matter. It's who counts them that matters
Claiming to win an election you knew you lost when there is no evidence is a dangerous lie.
Trump is right.
The election was surely stolen.
The votes that came in in PA, WI, and MI in the days following the election were not properly tallied.
Trump had huge leads in each of those states the morning after the election.
Anyone with a calculator could see that Biden was likely to win. The uncounted mail-in ballots were in the cities which were going 3:1 for Biden over Trump. The number of uncounted ballots showed Biden could win.
I woke up on the day post election fully expecting Biden had won as we had been told as I had totally ignored the election.
Was schocked to see Trump with substantial leads on three key states that would win him re-election. Yet, oddly, the pundits were not giving him those states unlike other states where the count was closer.
Even the NY Times online were saying Trump now had an 80% chance of winning.
Glenn G has an article on this.
Then as the days went by, somehow the previouly uncounted votes came in with more than 90% going to Biden. A pattern that did not occur in those states congressional races (i.e., Dem candidates did not get all those late counted votes).
The narrative was that these were mail in votes and non went to Trump cuz he told his supporters not to use that method.
You see, I was paying attention at the time of the election. I don't need pundits to tell ne what happened after the fact.
Biden, for example, was given nearly 80% of those votes in PA, a state where including those votes, he got 50.1% of the vote.
According to the Pennsylvania Election Returns' website, Biden received 1,995,691 mail-in votes to Trump's 595,538. Biden won the state and its 20 electoral votes with 50.1 percent of the vote to Trump's 48.84 percent.
The following acknowledges this but puts establishment spin on it:
Reuters: Social media users have been sharing posts claiming that during the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 there were vote dumps of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots only for Democrat Joe Biden in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, suggesting this proves voter fraud allegations. These vote spikes did occur, but they also included Trump votes, accounted for largely left-leaning urban counties, and one state experienced a clerical error.
Note the concede the vote spikes did occur, but "also include Trump votes" -- ignoring the fact that 80% of the votes went to Biden and that no such spikes occurred in other races in those states.
The votes that came in in PA, WI, and MI in the days following the election were not properly tallied.
Trump had huge leads in each of those states the morning after the election.
Anyone with a calculator could see that Biden was likely to win. The uncounted mail-in ballots were in the cities which were going 3:1 for Biden over Trump. The number of uncounted ballots showed Biden could win.
Really?
Which cities were those in PA, WI, and MI where this phenomena took place.
Why were the late counts only in those cities?
The late votes went to Biden @ 4 to 1.
What were the final vote totals in each of those cities?
You don't know, do you?
You are simply making an assertion which you have no clue as to whether it is true or not, not having bothered to look into it
I woke up on the day post election fully expecting Biden had won as we had been told as I had totally ignored the election.
Was schocked to see Trump with substantial leads on three key states that would win him re-election. Yet, oddly, the pundits were not giving him those states unlike other states where the count was closer.
Even the NY Times online were saying Trump now had an 80% chance of winning.
Glenn G has an article on this.
Then as the days went by, somehow the previouly uncounted votes came in with more than 90% going to Biden. A pattern that did not occur in those states congressional races (i.e., Dem candidates did not get all those late counted votes).
The narrative was that these were mail in votes and non went to Trump cuz he told his supporters not to use that method.
You see, I was paying attention at the time of the election. I don't need pundits to tell ne what happened after the fact.
Biden, for example, was given nearly 80% of those votes in PA, a state where including those votes, he got 50.1% of the vote.
According to the Pennsylvania Election Returns' website, Biden received 1,995,691 mail-in votes to Trump's 595,538. Biden won the state and its 20 electoral votes with 50.1 percent of the vote to Trump's 48.84 percent.
The following acknowledges this but puts establishment spin on it:
Reuters: Social media users have been sharing posts claiming that during the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 there were vote dumps of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots only for Democrat Joe Biden in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, suggesting this proves voter fraud allegations. These vote spikes did occur, but they also included Trump votes, accounted for largely left-leaning urban counties, and one state experienced a clerical error.
Note the concede the vote spikes did occur, but "also include Trump votes" -- ignoring the fact that 80% of the votes went to Biden and that no such spikes occurred in other races in those states.
The election was clearly stolen
When you get fraud on a scale this sophisticated and large, there has to be higher ups involved. You can't do it with your run-of-the-mill election local yokel types. I'm thinking FBI, DOJ, Hunter Biden, Pence. That level. Maybe Bolton and Sessions. Tell me those cavorters didn't have a axe to grind with President Trump.
