agip wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
What is odd that you see no conflict of thought on Burisma, Biden Family China “business,” Hunter’s behavior, and the reflection of those facts on Joe and Jill.
Really, you just choose to look the other way because of your extreme liberal views.
Burisma shows that Joe is *more* honest and tough. He literally asked Ukraine to sic a more dedicated prosecutor against the company Hunter was associated with. The idea that Burisma shows any kind of Joe corruption is so backwards it's absurd. It's the opposite.
I don't care much about Hunter's behavior. He is not in government.
"Reflection" on Joe and Jill? That they have a troubled son? Ok, well I suppose fine. They have a troubled son. Adjust your vote and support accordingly.
as for China, factchecks suggest Hunter traded on his famous name but did nothing illegal. And Joe is just not involved. China always tries to hand money to children of foreign politicians. As of course they did to Trump, by handing trademarks to Ivanka.
this sort of thing, on a right-wing documentary about the
China issues sums it up well:
"The documentary leaves the impression that former Vice President Joe Biden is willing to sell out his country’s national security for personal gain. But independent experts agree that this assertion is baseless. The documentary never says that either Biden broke the law, but its pairing of the Bidens with Chinese figures charged with espionage and other crimes, punctuated by spooky music, might give a viewer that impression. However, there is no evidence that Hunter Biden came close to breaking the law, much less any evidence that his father has done so. "
https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/oct/19/fact-checking-claims-about-hunter-biden-joe-biden-/