Other than, you know, calling for a ban on all Muslims entering the United States.
Other than, you know, calling for a ban on all Muslims entering the United States.
EXACTLY. You're surprised they attacked a presidential candidate whose platform includes banning the way that they were able to come to America and prosper?
And yes, it is a sacrifice for the parents as well. Maybe you'll have kids some day.
That's not much of a concession speech, but I'll accept it anyway and let you gracefully bow out!Link wrote:
lipstick on a pig wrote:If so, then Ole Bill must have miscalculated badly, or must really hate his "wife", because the guy he talked into running has energized the republican party in a way not seen since Reagan, and that guy is swinging at Bill and Hillary in ways the other rep. candidates he so handily dispatched would never have dared to do, Lol!
Ha!
And to think, up until now, I wasn't sure whether you were a troll. Too bad. You were doing a good job. Sad!
Congratulations, on the long list of things you suck at in life, you can now add:
cutting and pasting.
This election is unfrickinbelievable! Love it! Just when it looks like a poor, honest, immigrant family just trying to get by has to endure the death of their son via war (an absolutely terrible, terrible tragedy of course)... It is exposed that the father is a big time law professional in bed with the Clintons, Saudi Arabia, and the OPEC!! All future elections are going to be so F'n boring.
Oh, and of course the ultimate irony is that of the two candidates, only one had a direct impact on sending Mr Khan's heroic son to war in the first place.
Clinton War Wagon wrote:
This election is unfrickinbelievable! Love it! Just when it looks like a poor, honest, immigrant family just trying to get by has to endure the death of their son via war (an absolutely terrible, terrible tragedy of course)... It is exposed that the father is a big time law professional in bed with the Clintons, Saudi Arabia, and the OPEC!! All future elections are going to be so F'n boring.
Oh, and of course the ultimate irony is that of the two candidates, only one had a direct impact on sending Mr Khan's heroic son to war in the first place.
I wouldn't doubt it if their son is a CIA asset and still alive.
Coffee and a donut wrote:
But seriously, how do you make fun of a woman at your rally because her baby is crying?
Crying babies are annoying. We all agree on that.
But c'mon, Donald, did you really not think that the media would jump all over that one?
Another non-story from the liberal media. We are now debating a crying baby at a Trump event. Obviously, Hillary would have aborted it months in advance.
Read this and let me know what you think...
http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/personal-message-muslim-father-whose-son-killed-iraq
I think it is typical partisan deflection from West. Nothing new from him. I think West is wrong in what he writes about Benghazi, which is irrelevant, and I think West should understand quite easily why Khan would pick the moment to speak out against a presidential candidate wanting to put a hiatus on Muslim immigration.
observer of lobotimized libs wrote:
Congratulations on avoiding the issue!
What issue?
Let me know when you want to ask a genuine question.macdaddy wrote:
observer of lobotimized libs wrote:Congratulations on avoiding the issue!
What issue?
Isn't the left's level of denial, amazing? They just simply move right past whatever inconvenient issue pops up, like it never happened.
I mean, how can one take themselves seriously when they know that they're completely lying to themselves? Absolutely fascinating.
Pierson just blamed Capt Khan's death on Clinton and Obama!!!!!!!
Can't make this stuff up!!!!!!
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#nowdur dur durrr wrote:
Isn't the left's level of denial, amazing? They just simply move right past whatever inconvenient issue pops up, like it never happened.
I mean, how can one take themselves seriously when they know that they're completely lying to themselves? Absolutely fascinating.
Kramerica wrote:
Pierson just blamed Capt Khan's death on Clinton and Obama!!!!!!!
Can't make this stuff up!!!!!!
Yeah, that's just wrong. Pierson should also have credited Clinton with resurrecting Captain Khan's corpse.
Scoreboardz wrote:
dur dur durrr wrote:http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#nowIsn't the left's level of denial, amazing? They just simply move right past whatever inconvenient issue pops up, like it never happened.
I mean, how can one take themselves seriously when they know that they're completely lying to themselves? Absolutely fascinating.
Everyone knows that Nate Silver predicted accurately that Obama would win! He's with the Democrats!!!
[/sarcasm]
Clinton War Wagon wrote:
This election is unfrickinbelievable! Love it! Just when it looks like a poor, honest, immigrant family just trying to get by has to endure the death of their son via war (an absolutely terrible, terrible tragedy of course)... It is exposed that the father is a big time law professional in bed with the Clintons, Saudi Arabia, and the OPEC!! All future elections are going to be so F'n boring.
Oh, and of course the ultimate irony is that of the two candidates, only one had a direct impact on sending Mr Khan's heroic son to war in the first place.
How else do you get a speaking gig at the DNC? Some Clinton operative going to trawl through thousands of names finding someone who won't blow it in front of a national audience? No.
Once again, Hillary is over qualified. She knew the right person for the task and got him up there and he nailed it.
Did the Dean of Klown College pull anything like it off at the RNC? No. Reason #1, he's a clown.
You mean to tell me that this guy didn't contribute to change the course of these elections?
http://i0.wp.com/espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/ap_16201006389508.jpg?quality=70&strip=all&w=575&ssl=1Hard to believe...
WHat did he nail exactly? If the media didn't drive the story, it could have been completely swept under the rug.
The RNC had a mother up on stage that said HRC was directly responsible for her son's death. Surprise, surprise, the media didn't spend the next 2 weeks discussing it, or asking her what "sacrifices" she has made.
The RNC had a Muslim speak. They had a homosexual man speak (and Trump specifically noted the RNC support/reaction to Thiel in his own speech). The RNC had a few African Americans, including members of law enforcement. And of course, they have the parents of several individuals murdered by illegal immigrants- including those that took place in sanctuary cities- on their side... How much coverage do those poor parents receive? Right.