As I pointed out in the “Tactics” thread, many of you guys clearly don’t understand how tactical championship racing works. Stitchmo and Middling Distance are the worst offenders, and I wonder if you are trolls.
1) Sure, taking the rail and holding the lead and fending off every move would be the optimal strategy. This is NOT a feasible strategy unless you are definitively the fittest in the field. It is why Centro’s 2016 championship was so remarkable. It is the exception, it is incredibly difficult.
Hocker is NOT so much better than the field that he can get away with this. You may think he is, just because of his time trialed PR. He is not. That is what makes Jakob’s victories so impressive; he genuinely WAS that much better than the field. Josh is Cole’s equal. It’s clear they are very, very evenly matched runners. If Cole just held first place for 2900m, he would have been out kicked by Kerr. He, wisely, is aware of the level of his competition.
2) And sure, drafting off a solid leader or just following the best challenger and out kicking him at the end would be the second best strategy. This is NOT practical in the majority of pack-style, championship races. It just can’t work. This 3000 was a perfect example. Hocker would have loved to follow Kerr immediately, but he got trapped by Schrub. This was not Cole’s fault, it’s part of racing. Had Nuguse not tripped Wale and gotten Cole stuck on the rail at 500 to go, it’s likely Cole wins this race. Them’s the breaks. And Kerr capitalized on this moment brilliantly by boxing Cole in, intentionally. With 2 evenly matched runners, one good move will decide the race, and it was a savvy move.
The race was only decided by 0.14. you guys are acting like it was a travesty for Cole to lose. He barely got beaten, by his equal.
”Your move, Cole”