Oh my god. I just came to terms with that everything is lies and our world as we know it si fake. We are a test project in a controlled bubbled that is a recreation of what earth once was, in theory, to future life beings that are studying us like a science project. They show us photos of our earth by in reality we live in a controlled, flat duplication of what earth once was before we destroyed our planet in past times.
truth serum wrote:
Oh my god. I just came to terms with that everything is lies and our world as we know it si fake. We are a test project in a controlled bubbled that is a recreation of what earth once was, in theory, to future life beings that are studying us like a science project. They show us photos of our earth by in reality we live in a controlled, flat duplication of what earth once was before we destroyed our planet in past times.
That would make a good movie.
Legit question wrote:
The Lunar Module/Capsule shielding in the 1960s technology must have been very good to keep the astronauts alive and today's isn't?
Yes, lead based paint is banned now but back then it was the sh*t.
Couple of coats of that and you could hover over Chernobyl while it melted down.
Bart Rutan wrote:
Legit question wrote:The Lunar Module/Capsule shielding in the 1960s technology must have been very good to keep the astronauts alive and today's isn't?
Yes, lead based paint is banned now but back then it was the sh*t.
Couple of coats of that and you could hover over Chernobyl while it melted down.
It had to more than lead paint. DDT was banned too, it would have wiped out malaria, but those those thin egg shells got the the tree hugggers all bent out of shape, but that's another topic.
Doubler wrote:
Legit question wrote:The idea that people and standing, ships are sailing, and planes are flying upside down on certain parts of Earth while others tilted at 90 degrees and all other impossible angles is complete absurdity. Â The idea of a man digging a hole straight down to reach sky on the other side is ludicrous. Common sense tells us in nature there is an "up" or "down" unlike "everything is relative" rhetoric of the Newtonian paradigm.
Copying and pasting directly from this site. well done. You are a troll or a flat earth sheep. Or a troll-sheep hybrid.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html?m=1
If I may, I did find that site first, see the first couple posts on this thread. Credit is due. I think Thread starter or someone else who wanted to see where I found my troll reply jargon from, then they ran with it for 300 pages...
truth serum wrote:
Oh my god. I just came to terms with that everything is lies and our world as we know it si fake. We are a test project in a controlled bubbled that is a recreation of what earth once was, in theory, to future life beings that are studying us like a science project. They show us photos of our earth by in reality we live in a controlled, flat duplication of what earth once was before we destroyed our planet in past times.
Have you seen "The Truman Show"?
Hall Monitor wrote:
Doubler wrote:Copying and pasting directly from this site. well done. You are a troll or a flat earth sheep. Or a troll-sheep hybrid.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html?m=1If I may, I did find that site first, see the first couple posts on this thread. Credit is due. I think Thread starter or someone else who wanted to see where I found my troll reply jargon from, then they ran with it for 300 pages...
Already addressed, try and keep up.
Several have asked how the sun rotates on the flat earth model:
Day and night:
Legit question wrote:
And these same electromagnets will exert a powerful down force if one flew over the North Pole too?
Yes, so obviously they are not used there. But it is still difficult to fly because gravity points directly toward the ground.
Closer to the equator, gravity pulls you more sideways relative to the ground, so it takes much less power to stay aloft. You can fly the plane at any roll angle you want because gravity will pull you in the same direction it pulls the plane.
It is dangerous to fly near or at the equator itself because you will constantly drift south and expert navigational skills are required, in addition to metal and electromagnets. The danger zone starts near the northern tropical latitudes, the most infamous area being the Bermuda Triangle.
Obviously if there is n icy perimeter snowboarders would have already discovered it.
Bad wigins, your posts are so incredibly stupid because you don't understand this one simple thing: There is no force pulling all mater on earth toward the south pole. In space there is no set orientation and no up or down. Your analogies, like the tennis ball one, are flawed because on earth there is a force (gravity) that's pulling all matter in the ball towards its south end.
Airplanes can fly anywhere on earth because their wings produce enough lift to counteract the force of gravity that pulls them towards the earth's center. There is no extra-planetary force pulling them in any particular direction other than towards the ground.
Oh and you should listen to Bart Rutan. Pilots know all about this stuff (I'm going for my license later this year so I'm not quite in the club yet) and can prove through personal experience that what you're saying is totally wrong.
OP wrote:
Bad wigins, your posts are so incredibly stupid because you don't understand this one simple thing: There is no force pulling all mater on earth toward the south pole. In space there is no set orientation and no up or down. Your analogies, like the tennis ball one, are flawed because on earth there is a force (gravity) that's pulling all matter in the ball towards its south end.
Airplanes can fly anywhere on earth because their wings produce enough lift to counteract the force of gravity that pulls them towards the earth's center. There is no extra-planetary force pulling them in any particular direction other than towards the ground.
Oh and you should listen to Bart Rutan. Pilots know all about this stuff (I'm going for my license later this year so I'm not quite in the club yet) and can prove through personal experience that what you're saying is totally wrong.
But no conclusive evidence of flying over Antarctica and up North again.
Testis Gravitas wrote:
The turning of the Earth allows it to elude the effect of the gravity of the moon on its waters.
If the Earth suddenly stopped turning it would have the water drawn up into a huge mountain that would eventually go into orbit.
Huh? where did you dig that from?
Here's a drone flying over the South Pole and a visit to the South Pole by a human:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FmP8gUNcQs
So why didn't they fall off the edge?
OP wrote:
There is no force pulling all mater on earth toward the south pole. In space there is no set orientation and no up or down.
If you have ever looked at a map you should know north is up and south is down.
And this is true in the whole solar system There is a solar north and solar south. Tie a string to a tennis ball and swing it around in a circle. See how it defies gravity? If the planets weren't orbiting the sun they would fall right out of the solar system.
The real question for physicists is what is there at the bottom of the universe, if there is one. Probably so much matter has fallen down there that there is a giant black hole. But not as big as the black hole of ignorance among you people who don't understand this stuff.
There real question for physicists/cosmologists this week is whether there is a parallel universe where time goes backward.
http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-propose-a-mirror-universe-where-time-moves-backwards
Why is the moon flipped upside down?
coach d wrote:
Here's a drone flying over the South Pole and a visit to the South Pole by a human:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FmP8gUNcQsSo why didn't they fall off the edge?
Easy, because that is not really the south pole
No, the "Earth" is truly flat. Look at flight patterns - they never cross the poles. But Why?
If the Earth is not a sphere then why are there winds?
