If they fully enforced their written guidelines, the mods would probablyl delete about 90% of your posts before banning you permanently, because they want to have a civil discussion forum.
Note they also deleted mine pointing out you don't know the difference between geography and geodesy.
You confuse civility with lying and obfuscation, your mainstay. But it is obviously approved of.
There are many, many examples where you acted like being 9 years old.
- never admitting when being wrong - N-E-V-E-R
- changing subject over and over again
- calling others to be stupid (day after day) even when it's totally obvious you were the one...
- no, absolutely no grasp of logical reasoning
- spamming thread after thread (thousands of posts!) with exactly the same content
- extremely biased towards NZ (and British) athletes
- not even accepting pure facts like race results
On a normal forum with interest in productive and friendly discussions you would have been banned long, long ago
What 29:00 runners are running 2:08? Guaranteed if you’re running 2:08 you’re far more talented than 29:00.
Nataumi Terada 28:47/2:08:03
Tsukaasa Koyana 28:44/2:08
Yugoslav Kashiwa 28:49/2:08:11
Kenya Uchida 28:44/2:08:12
Koji kobayashi 29:12/2:08:51
Shoma Yamamoto 28:59/2:08:52
And there are tons more. Most people running 2:08 are 28:00 people. But there is a subset that do better at the marathon distance and run like a 10k guy a min faster. And some 10k that run marathoners slower. Se wejo for a 28 min guy who didn’t break 218….
And it appears we have more woman that can carry 10k speed over to the marathon.
I can rely on you to take the reference to being a "flat-earther" literally when it is a reference to your views about doping, which are similarly completely detached from reality.
I can always rely on you to change the subject to hide your inability to support your many beliefs.
I don't have any special views about doping, but rather data and fact supported views about elite performance.
What 29:00 runners are running 2:08? Guaranteed if you’re running 2:08 you’re far more talented than 29:00.
Nataumi Terada 28:47/2:08:03
Tsukaasa Koyana 28:44/2:08
Yugoslav Kashiwa 28:49/2:08:11
Kenya Uchida 28:44/2:08:12
Koji kobayashi 29:12/2:08:51
Shoma Yamamoto 28:59/2:08:52
And there are tons more. Most people running 2:08 are 28:00 people. But there is a subset that do better at the marathon distance and run like a 10k guy a min faster. And some 10k that run marathoners slower. Se wejo for a 28 min guy who didn’t break 218….
And it appears we have more woman that can carry 10k speed over to the marathon.
They are not 29:00 runners. I was a 29:00 runner back in the day and there was no way I was getting close to 2:08. If I had ran 2:08 there was no way that I wouldn’t think, talent-wise, that I was anything but a sub 28 runner. If the runners you posted above didn’t run sub 28 it is only because they move up to the marathon too soon. They are/were all capable of sub 28. Especially now with the shoes.
The fact that Hassan was far off of Tigst Assefa's world record this weekend in Chicago (while wearing Nike's super shoes) tells me that Tigst is indeed a doper. Hassan has much more talent and is in her prime, but almost 2 minutes off the WR mark set just weeks before.
No, because those women in the 14:00-14:15 range haven't been focusing on the marathon. If people like Hassan, Gidey, Taye, etc were to really focus on the marathon, we would see times in the 2:09:30-2:11:00 range for women. Remember that a woman is also different to a male, thanks to better fat burning capacity. In the past when we saw Joan Benoît (15:30/32:00) run 2:21:50, we knew that she was running with men in the 14:30-14:45/29:50-30:20 range.
In a few years when an Ethiopian woman runs 2:09:30, almost as fast as Bill Rodgers, people will continue the doping rumors, with zero substance.
If you are winning major marathons, you are doping. It is that simple. I have never seen so-called fans of a sport that are so uniformed and delusional. And it is the usual suspects that always come up with "well you see, it is ashually logical...."
no such thing as clean at top level in track and field,or most sports.
No, because those women in the 14:00-14:15 range haven't been focusing on the marathon. If people like Hassan, Gidey, Taye, etc were to really focus on the marathon, we would see times in the 2:09:30-2:11:00 range for women. Remember that a woman is also different to a male, thanks to better fat burning capacity. In the past when we saw Joan Benoît (15:30/32:00) run 2:21:50, we knew that she was running with men in the 14:30-14:45/29:50-30:20 range.
In a few years when an Ethiopian woman runs 2:09:30, almost as fast as Bill Rodgers, people will continue the doping rumors, with zero substance.
Chepngetich is doped to the gills.
Well, people are thinking that but there's no concrete evidence that she is doped to the gills as people say. She may be, but no proof, as of yet.
I remember there was a time in the late 70s and early 80s when women who were breaking 2:30:00 were thought of as exceptional and then they approached 2:20:00 and when that was broken they approached 2:15:00, and now that that was broken they got to 2:11:50 with Tigist and now 2:09:56 with Chepngetich.
Top women athletes now are merely reaping the benefits of believing in their physical capacities and closing the gap on the men and even though they will never catch up completely the gap is closing just like it did with swimming and other endurance sports like 24 hour races, etc