2600 bro wrote:
95% of LRC posts are by the same 10 trolls. This heavily skews the perceived consensus on here.
Yep, the same 10 liberal trolls
-
18
-
2600 bro wrote:
DanM wrote:
My guess is its about 3 maniacal vaxxers for this thread topic and they lost. "Bivalent Booster" rejected by 83% of the US population. Society has moved on. It’s hilarious.
80% of adults (92% in DanM's state) and 95% of seniors have completed the primary series.
The anti-vaxxers lost - (but took 300k+ Americans with them)
You can't CONFIRM that;)
Another liberal stat that is so heavily skewed it's obvious to the average person, but not 2600.
15 -
Masks and vaccines did nothing but prolong the time it took for natural immunity to wipe it out.
Evidence. me. and everyone else who just said no. We fine.
29 -
Noyankee wrote:
Masks and vaccines did nothing but prolong the time it took for natural immunity to wipe it out.
Evidence. me. and everyone else who just said no. We fine.
No sign of an intelligent life from you
95 -
Newname wrote:
Badcompany wrote:
And the US Government has 10x the debt of the top 1%’s net worth.
I know, dipsh!ts, like to accuse those of us who point out reality as “Siding with the billionaires.” It’s really a matter of knowing how to read financial statements and being able to do a little math.
Top one percent has net worth of @ $41 trillion.
US debt is @ $33 trillion.
Better re-read those financial statements
Sure they do, Karen. Even if that we’re true, and they paid off the debt. None of it would go to you. You’d still be the same nothing happening loser.
22 -
Badcompany wrote:
Newname wrote:
Top one percent has net worth of @ $41 trillion.
US debt is @ $33 trillion.
Better re-read those financial statements
Sure they do, Karen. Even if that we’re true, and they paid off the debt. None of it would go to you. You’d still be the same nothing happening loser.
Can't admit the data listed is correct, can you? Counters your worldview
13 -
The OP’s question contains several epistemological errors and the OP the .
1) A government license is a validation of a professional’s knowledge and skills.
2) The validity of a claim is a function of the number or percentage of people who believe it.
Both premises are false.
Government is nothing more than a monopoly on physical force. It is not a source of medical knowledge. Government licensure lowers and degrades the quality of medical skills on the market. Because we have a generation of government licensed doctors in name only, we must be cautious of what they say.
The validity of an idea has nothing to do with the number of people who believe it. One man can be right, and the multitudes can be wrong, or vice versa.
33 -
Reverse the Numbers, 39% if that wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
80% of adults (92% in DanM's state) and 95% of seniors have completed the primary series.
The anti-vaxxers lost - (but took 300k+ Americans with them)
You can't CONFIRM that;)
Another liberal stat that is so heavily skewed it's obvious to the average person, but not 2600.
which stat?
21 -
A report based solely on people prior to any vaccination who had COVID showed a marked increase among all categories in heart problems a year after COVID. Those heart problems are real and have nothing to do with vaccination.
50 -
Newname wrote:
Badcompany wrote:
Sure they do, Karen. Even if that we’re true, and they paid off the debt. None of it would go to you. You’d still be the same nothing happening loser.
Can't admit the data listed is correct, can you? Counters your worldview
You didn’t list any data or link a source d!psh!t. You just made a ridiculous claim.
The Forbes 400 Richest Americans list has been published annually since 1982. The combined net worth of the 2020 class of the 400 richest Americans $3.2 trillion, up from $2.7 trillion in 2017.[1] As of October 2020, there were 614[2] billionaires in the United States.[1]
10 -
Reverse the Numbers, 39% if that wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
95% of LRC posts are by the same 10 trolls. This heavily skews the perceived consensus on here.
Yep, the same 10 liberal trolls
If the mainstream view of medical doctors (both Republican and democrat) is to get the vaccine, would you expect this
11 -
If they are correct in thinking they have interpreted VAERS correctly, then why aren’t they taking steps to get the FDA to act and to no longer recommend the vaccines?
00 -
Badcompany wrote:
Newname wrote:
Can't admit the data listed is correct, can you? Counters your worldview
You didn’t list any data or link a source d!psh!t. You just made a ridiculous claim.
The Forbes 400 Richest Americans list has been published annually since 1982. The combined net worth of the 2020 class of the 400 richest Americans $3.2 trillion, up from $2.7 trillion in 2017.[1] As of October 2020, there were 614[2] billionaires in the United States.[1]
You doubt the data?
Top one percent = 1% of 335 million = how many people?
Hint. The answer is not 400.
Source? The Federal Reserve.
02 -
Blogger(Letsrun certified medical pro) wrote:
If they are correct in thinking they have interpreted VAERS correctly, then why aren’t they taking steps to get the FDA to act and to no longer recommend the vaccines?
Any guesses?
Who funds/controls the FDA?
02 -
zxcvzxcv wrote:
A report based solely on people prior to any vaccination who had COVID showed a marked increase among all categories in heart problems a year after COVID. Those heart problems are real and have nothing to do with vaccination.
Lockdowns and masking
02 -
Newname wrote:
Badcompany wrote:
You didn’t list any data or link a source d!psh!t. You just made a ridiculous claim.
The Forbes 400 Richest Americans list has been published annually since 1982. The combined net worth of the 2020 class of the 400 richest Americans $3.2 trillion, up from $2.7 trillion in 2017.[1] As of October 2020, there were 614[2] billionaires in the United States.[1]
You doubt the data?
Top one percent = 1% of 335 million = how many people?
Hint. The answer is not 400.
Source? The Federal Reserve.
The piece says they “Controlled’ the money and it doesn’t define what that means. If you’re a money manager you essentially control the assets under management but the money is not yours to keep:
But yeah, let’s seize Apple, Amazon, and every other American company and let the government run them. I’m sure they’ll be much more efficient.
The irony is that a lot of that inequality is caused by a central planning agency, called the Fed and CNBC that you cited spends half the day ass-kissing it.
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.21 -
Badcompany wrote:
Newname wrote:
You doubt the data?
Top one percent = 1% of 335 million = how many people?
Hint. The answer is not 400.
Source? The Federal Reserve.
The piece says they “Controlled’ the money and it doesn’t define what that means. If you’re a money manager you essentially control the assets under management but the money is not yours to keep:
But yeah, let’s seize Apple, Amazon, and every other American company and let the government run them. I’m sure they’ll be much more efficient.
The irony is that a lot of that inequality is caused by a central planning agency, called the Fed and CNBC that you cited spends half the day ass-kissing it.
What's the difference between wealth controlled by the 1% and their net worth?
People with the top 1% of net worth in the U.S. in 2022 had $10,815,000 in net worth.
Assuming that's the average net worth and there are 335 million Americans, the total net worth of the 1% if 3,335,000 x $10,815,000 = @ $37 trillion. Ties in pretty well with the $41 trillion figure. If the $10,815,000 is the median wealth of the top 1%, then the $37 trillion is higher.
02 -
Badcompany wrote:
Newname wrote:
You doubt the data?
Top one percent = 1% of 335 million = how many people?
Hint. The answer is not 400.
Source? The Federal Reserve.
The piece says they “Controlled’ the money and it doesn’t define what that means. If you’re a money manager you essentially control the assets under management but the money is not yours to keep:
But yeah, let’s seize Apple, Amazon, and every other American company and let the government run them. I’m sure they’ll be much more efficient.
The irony is that a lot of that inequality is caused by a central planning agency, called the Fed and CNBC that you cited spends half the day ass-kissing it.
Apple, Amazon, etc are the government
02 -
Newname wrote:
Badcompany wrote:
The piece says they “Controlled’ the money and it doesn’t define what that means. If you’re a money manager you essentially control the assets under management but the money is not yours to keep:
But yeah, let’s seize Apple, Amazon, and every other American company and let the government run them. I’m sure they’ll be much more efficient.
The irony is that a lot of that inequality is caused by a central planning agency, called the Fed and CNBC that you cited spends half the day ass-kissing it.
Apple, Amazon, etc are the government
Yeah, once a company gets super big, the government can’t help but its stick its paws in but they came from the private sector . I was an Amazon customer when they only sold books.
there’s really two separate issues. Whether the government is an oversized, bloated, inefficient mess, it is. And whether the system is set up to help those closest to it. It is.
At this point, I don’t really care. Covid was a dealbreaker for me. When you scam me to the point where I can’t participate in society unless I get some bullsh!t drug injected into me, I’m not gonna give aa fvck about you going forward.
02 -
So the anti vax person’s excuse is simply the science is clear, but those people over there have money and I don’t, so there’s no chance for me in making an impact. So I have to go/stay home devastated complaining while people worldwide get poisoned by these vaccines (supposedly)?
20
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.