OFFICIAL LRC President Donald Trump SECOND TERM Thread

Noyankee wrote:

El Runkin wrote:

Your story isn't making sense so far, Spuds.

First, it would be very odd/strange for a purported lawyer for one of Epstein's female victims to refer to his client as "one of the Epstein girls." Thus, we are skeptical of your account.

Second, if you represented "one of the Epstein girls" in a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate, you'd know whether or not she had a NDA (mentioned in your subsequent post) and you'd know its terms. On the other hand, if you did not represent "one of the Epstein girls" in a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate, but you represented her in some other matter, then it's not "odd" in the slightest that she did not discuss Trump -- that would be something she would only mention to her lawyer in the Epstein litigation, and she would be instructed not to tell anyone else. Surely you realize that as her purported lawyer.

Third, contrary to your assertion in a subsequent post ("Possible, but I don't see it as likely"), it would be very likely that anyone settling a lawsuit against Epstein or his estate would have executed a NDA as part of that settlement. She's not going to violate her NDA by telling you stuff you don't need to know. Surely you realize that as a purported lawyer.

Fourth, it's just illogical for anyone to draw conclusions about anything from what someone else did NOT say to them. You could speculate anything on god's green Erf from what you are not told by acquaintances. Jesus Christ, man. Think much?

GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY

I could give a shlt what your skeptical of dunse? challenge me?

I never said I was a lawyer diuchebag, I said she was a client. There are other businesses than lawyers, my God did you just go stupid that quick?

Im sure you also believe, since the Democrats had these Epstein files, and were in the ejection of the century…that they sat on this news? you bet.

Challenge me or be a coward?

BillionairesForHire wrote:

gnarlysheen wrote:

Hm. Where's the evidence he went to Epstein's island and did anything? I haven't seen any direct evidence of it. And the sexual assault? I also wasn't there to witness any of it and wouldn't be surprised if it was politically motivated, like most attacks against Trump. What about the Clintons? Obama's allegations? They all have some allegation against them. I wasn't there and I'll never know the truth about any of it. What I care about is how well they run the country. Not some lady from the 1970s saying Trump groped her in a nightclub while taking shots of absinthe. Every dude in their 20s likes to party and chase women. So what? How big of a whore was she acting? Who cares? I just don't buy the politically motivated narrative that 'Trump is a child molester.'

I certainly don't believe the left had any intentions of being moral when it came to all of the disgusting child affirmation trans queer-washing that was occurring. That is appalling.

Maybe it is just me, but this reads like a lot of excuses for: Multiple witnesses to entering teenage girl dressing rooms, sexual comments about his own daughter, sex with a porn star while his wife was home with his newborn, found liable for sexual assault and defamation, being friends with Epstein and Maxwell, not releasing Epstein files.