Down goes the Dow

Thanks. Yes Warren’s doing well up 3.6% to Hussman’s 3.5%. Bet Hussman gets Warren by year end.

Igy

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Thanks. Yes Warren’s doing well up 3.6% to Hussman’s -3.83%. Bet Hussman gets Warren by year end.

Igy

Fixed.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Thanks. Yes Warren’s doing well up 3.6% to Hussman’s 3.5%. Bet Hussman gets Warren by year end.

Igy

Bet on. That's not going to happen.

seattle prattle wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Thanks. Yes Warren’s doing well up 3.6% to Hussman’s 3.5%. Bet Hussman gets Warren by year end.

Igy

Bet on. That's not going to happen.

Agreed. Making up a 7%+ differential in less than 2 months is a tall task. It won’t happen.

Go Pats!

You’re not special wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Try keeping up with the thread, I did not bring it up. So move over to the other thread and keep Flagpole company. He spends most of the time pontificating.

Learn to read: No one said you brought it up.

The point is you want to be able to talk Trump here while muzzling others from doing the same. You are un-American.

He’s following Trump’s game plan. Try to silence the free speech of others while demeaning anyone who disagrees with him. It’s classic Trump.

Stanley Morgan wrote:

seattle prattle wrote:

Bet on. That's not going to happen.

Agreed. Making up a 7%+ differential in less than 2 months is a tall task. It won’t happen.

Go Pats!

Repair Mann wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Thanks. Yes Warren’s doing well up 3.6% to Hussman’s -3.83%. Bet Hussman gets Warren by year end.

Igy

Fixed.

Troll corrected.

Go Fats! Strut in your Brady Hero Jersey, it is Sunday!

Oh no you dint wrote:

You’re not special wrote:

Learn to read: No one said you brought it up.

The point is you want to be able to talk Trump here while muzzling others from doing the same. You are un-American.

He’s following Trump’s game plan. Try to silence the free speech of others while demeaning anyone who disagrees with him. It’s classic Trump.

“It’s worth remembering now that discipline is one of the central challenges in responding to market behavior, whether one uses internals, trend-following measures, momentum, or other factors. One reason we pay close attention to market internals is that we find them far more reliable than standard trend-following approaches. “Whipsaws” can also be challenging. In daily data, for example, the S&P 500 has crossed its 200-day moving average 62 times since the 2009 low. Yet even for strategies that are more reliable in historical and out-of-sample data, actually acting on their guidance can be difficult.

Trend-followers, for example, may plan to exit the market when prices break down, but once prices break down, they often decide that swing-trading and buying dips is the appropriate strategy, and after the market declines further, they suddenly fancy themselves as value investors. That’s how investors end up holding stocks all the way down to the bottom of a bear market. Severe market declines have a funny way of turning short-term speculations into long-term investments.”

John Hussman, November 2018 Market Commentary

So Says The Thought Police Poster wrote:

Oh no you dint wrote:

He’s following Trump’s game plan. Try to silence the free speech of others while demeaning anyone who disagrees with him. It’s classic Trump.

Yes!!

seattle prattle wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Keep your Warren Buffet portfolio which is negative on the year with more to come. You will be one of the naked swimmers as the tide keeps going out. ?

Hey Igy, you do know that Warren's H's Berkshire Hathaway announced earnings today and their net operating profit for the quarter more than doubled compared to the previous year, don't you? So, which way do you figure that tide's going?

link:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/03/berkshire-hathaway-earnings-q3-2018.html

Looking forward to Monday in that it's my 5th largest stock holding.

Broken poster wrote:

Repair Mann wrote:

Fixed.

https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/hsgfx/betaquote.html

Troll corrected.

Go Fats! Strut in your Brady Hero Jersey, it is Sunday!

Looks like the troll was right.

Sure dumb @ss a fund that starts the year at $6.27 and ends Friday at $6.49 is up 3.51% on the year.

Broken poster wrote:

Sure dumb @ss a fund that starts the year at $6.27 and ends Friday at $6.49 is up 3.51% on the year.

Correct, but when you figure in management fees, loads, and other expenses, it becomes a loser.

I’m surprised you didn’t know that. I’ll bet even Igy knows how to calculate returns.

It is fund performance loser. Go back under your rock dumb @ss.

Bocephus wrote:

Broken poster wrote:

Sure dumb @ss a fund that starts the year at $6.27 and ends Friday at $6.49 is up 3.51% on the year.

Correct, but when you figure in management fees, loads, and other expenses, it becomes a loser.

I’m surprised you didn’t know that. I’ll bet even Igy knows how to calculate returns.

So you are wrong and have you to build your excuse.

Not wrong. We’re discussing YTD return. That includes gains minus costs. This is Investment 101.

Well for one the performance posted includes management fees, secondly it beats your portfolio with or without loads, fees and expenses. That is the point loser.

Bo’s Syphilis wrote:

Well for one the performance posted includes management fees, secondly it beats your portfolio with or without loads, fees and expenses. That is the point loser.

Yes, the performance I posted includes fees and is a point loser.

No, it doesn’t come close to beating my portfolio. You may have me confused with Igy.