oopsie wrote:
Is your TDS so strong that you think you made a rational point?
https://twitter.com/AlanDersh/status/1227985081299537922
I see. You have no response, so you're deflecting and providing links to state propaganda in lieu of making your own argument. Alan"I didn't take off my underwear" Darshowitz and Andrew Napolitano have ZERO credibility on this issue. None. Darsh is Trump's lawyer and Napolitano is friends with Roger Stone.
You are allowed to be a Democrat and serve on a jury. The juror in question disclosed her background information and Stone's attorney's had ample opportunity to examine her. This is nothing but sour grapes after the fact.
AlreadyVoted wrote:
Everyone agrees the sentence was unnecessarily large. It was a completely partisan motivated decision.
Oh, you think it was too harsh? Too unfair? Don't do the crime if you can't do the time! Isn't that what you Republicans always say? Thousands upon thousands of young people of color have been sentenced to longer prison sentences than Roger Stone for non-violent drug offenses. Are you demanding more lenient sentencing for them, too? Is Trump? Ha! He floated the idea of executing drug dealers just two days ago. Trump doesn't care about "unfair sentencing," he is only meddling in this case because he has a personal interest in doing so. (That's the motivation behind everything he does.) If you have no problem with this behavior, then you are an authoritarian, too.