People question the grown ass man who runs a 1:41 and leads 2 other people to do it with him, but nobody says anything about the 16 year old running 44.20 and looks completely tiredless?
People question the grown ass man who runs a 1:41 and leads 2 other people to do it with him, but nobody says anything about the 16 year old running 44.20 and looks completely tiredless?
Bravo
It has been questioned. It is no more credible than a 1:41. Check out the Quincy Wilson thread.
"According to 2019 statistics compiled by the WADA, the highest number of anti-doping rule violations (ADRV) by sport were in bodybuilding, athletics (such as track and field), cycling, and weightlifting. Together, these sports comprised more than half of all ADRVs."
What are you talking about? ADRV data from WADA is my starting point which help forms the foundation of my "position".
Recall you said "Track is indistinguishable from tour cycling now. Actually, it was WADA that said that. It lumps running together with bodybuilding and weightlifting, as well as cycling."
This quote from "healthnews" is not a quote from WADA, it does not say "indistinguishable" and it does not lump the four sports together.
They are easily distinguished, not only by number of positives (ranging from 160 to 272), but as I pointed out earlier, total number of samples, and positive test rates.
The figures came from WADA. So that isn't WADA? Who is it then? The writer made the same point that I have read in WADA documentation, which is hardly surprising because her point is based on WADA data. As for quotes - I don't collect them just to convince a stupid **** like yourself.
Once again, take special note of the words I make the extra effort to put in quotes that form the subject of my posts. "Indistinguishable" and "lumps together" only comes from you, not WADA or the writer at healthnews.
A reading from the Gospel of Armstronglivs:
"Track is indistinguishable from tour cycling now. Actually, it was WADA that said that. It lumps running together with bodybuilding and weightlifting, as well as cycling."
"According to 2019 statistics compiled by the WADA, the highest number of anti-doping rule violations (ADRV) by sport were in bodybuilding, athletics (such as track and field), cycling, and weightlifting. Together, these sports comprised more than half of all ADRVs."
What are you talking about? ADRV data from WADA is my starting point which help forms the foundation of my "position".
No, it isn't. You typically claim athletics is nowhere near afflicted with the level of doping that WADA suggests. Added to that, you claim doping is not a proven performance enhancer and actually does nothing for altitude-trained distance runners. So you accept none of the implications of high doping prevalence. The athletes may as well be gorging on cornflakes.
The figures came from WADA. So that isn't WADA? Who is it then? The writer made the same point that I have read in WADA documentation, which is hardly surprising because her point is based on WADA data. As for quotes - I don't collect them just to convince a stupid **** like yourself.
Once again, take special note of the words I make the extra effort to put in quotes that form the subject of my posts. "Indistinguishable" and "lumps together" only comes from you, not WADA or the writer at healthnews.
A reading from the Gospel of Armstronglivs:
"Track is indistinguishable from tour cycling now. Actually, it was WADA that said that. It lumps running together with bodybuilding and weightlifting, as well as cycling."
WADA distinguishes and separates these sports.
It says they all dope to much the same degree; it isn't saying they are the same sports - and nor am I. The usual trolling.
What are you talking about? ADRV data from WADA is my starting point which help forms the foundation of my "position".
No, it isn't. You typically claim athletics is nowhere near afflicted with the level of doping that WADA suggests. Added to that, you claim doping is not a proven performance enhancer and actually does nothing for altitude-trained distance runners. So you accept none of the implications of high doping prevalence. The athletes may as well be gorging on cornflakes.
Even you agree that WADA ADRV reports only suggest a low 1-2% "level of doping". Neither WADA nor healthnews talked about "proven performance enhancer" or doping doing something for "altitude-trained distance runners", nor did they suggest "high doping prevalence" let alone any subsequent "implications".
These are all your arguments, largely unsupported by WADA's ADRV data.
What WADA reports do show is that doping and testing exists across many sports across many nations.
Once again, take special note of the words I make the extra effort to put in quotes that form the subject of my posts. "Indistinguishable" and "lumps together" only comes from you, not WADA or the writer at healthnews.
WADA distinguishes and separates these sports.
It says they all dope to much the same degree; it isn't saying they are the same sports - and nor am I. The usual trolling.
You did not say "to much the same degree" (nor does WADA). You said that WADA said they were "indistinguishable".
It says they all dope to much the same degree; it isn't saying they are the same sports - and nor am I. The usual trolling.
You did not say "to much the same degree" (nor does WADA). You said that WADA said they were "indistinguishable".
"Indistinguishable" in respect of their involvement with doping; not indistinguishable as sports. You keep parading your difficulties with the English language.
You did not say "to much the same degree" (nor does WADA). You said that WADA said they were "indistinguishable".
"Indistinguishable" in respect of their involvement with doping; not indistinguishable as sports. You keep parading your difficulties with the English language.
Whatever you want "indistiguishable" to mean is irrelevant.
In all respects, what makes it wrong is that you attributed your nonsensical statements to WADA. WADA ADRV reports can and do distinguish the sports in all respects they measure, and do not lump the sports together in any respect.
"Indistinguishable" in respect of their involvement with doping; not indistinguishable as sports. You keep parading your difficulties with the English language.
Whatever you want "indistiguishable" to mean is irrelevant.
In all respects, what makes it wrong is that you attributed your nonsensical statements to WADA. WADA ADRV reports can and do distinguish the sports in all respects they measure, and do not lump the sports together in any respect.
Despite your confused semantic piffle they do. That is how the writer in the article was able to write that athletics is with cycling and weightlifting the worst doping offender. You say that article is the basis of your thinking. You should try thinking because you clearly haven't understood it, troll.
Whatever you want "indistiguishable" to mean is irrelevant.
In all respects, what makes it wrong is that you attributed your nonsensical statements to WADA. WADA ADRV reports can and do distinguish the sports in all respects they measure, and do not lump the sports together in any respect.
Despite your confused semantic piffle they do. That is how the writer in the article was able to write that athletics is with cycling and weightlifting the worst doping offender. You say that article is the basis of your thinking. You should try thinking because you clearly haven't understood it, troll.
Corrections. Once again, you falsely attributed words to WADA. No one, not even you, can find a quote that never existed outside your own active imagination.
WADA ADRV reports say that Bodybuilding is the worst by all measures, and by about a factor of 30 when compared to the number of tests, as these official reports distinguish and separate all sports and all nations from each other. "Semantics" is a game you play to pretend that words have contrary meanings in some esoteric respect. I do not say that "that article" written by a middleman forms any basis of my thinking, but that all of the data found in WADA reporting, (and AIU reporting) help form the foundation of my "position". This is why I never doubt the existence or prevelance of doping across all sports and all nations, including athletics.