Some of the burner account comments have been pretty horrific. NG's "apology" and subsequent removal was also incredibly tone-deaf. Very poor social media management at best, especially for a group trying to teach marketing / brand-building / social media growth skills.
The tone of the photos was objectively problematic. It's one thing to have the photographer post them, but for the NG page itself to promote them was really weird. This is a sport that's rife with issues relating to inappropriate relationships between authority figures and young female athletes. In just the last few years, we've had the Huntington situation, Mary Cain and Kara Goucher's exposé on Salazar, a scattering of (young, male) collegiate coaches fired for inappropriate relationships with their athletes, and a handful of similar (albeit lower profile) incidents.
Looking back on my own high school track experience from a decade ago, it's easy to pinpoint things that just feel...icky in retrospect. I'd imagine there are plenty of other posters in here who can recount stories of age 20-something assistant coaches / track photographers / etc. whose relationships with teenage athletes toed the line of what could be considered appropriate.
Any running-related brand -- especially one centering around high school and collegiate athletics -- should be aware of these things and take them into consideration when choosing what sort of content to publicize. When a company's organizing activities for minors, there needs to be a degree of responsible adult oversight going into everything -- and it's not at all clear whether such a thing exists at NG.
For the sake of the athletes, I hope everything's able to get sorted out and all of the really shocking rumors floating around end up being baseless. From what I've seen in the insta posts / reading through this thread, if I had a teenage daughter I would absolutely not want her attending events associated with NG.