casual obsever wrote:
Well there may be more allegations, but Mo is well too important to ever go down.
No. He's about to go down.
And once again, you'll have problems defending your claim that 'everybody dopes', when another obvious doper - and one 'too important to ever go down' - gets busted.
Coevett wrote:
casual obsever wrote:
Well there may be more allegations, but Mo is well too important to ever go down.
No. He's about to go down.
And once again, you'll have problems defending your claim that 'everybody dopes', when another obvious doper - and one 'too important to ever go down' - gets busted.
He's not going down
He's got ukad at his back
And lord coe and Radcliffe
Having said that , the UK media are chomping at the bit to drop the dirt on him
Libel laws holding them back
Coevett wrote:
No. He's about to go down.
And once again, you'll have problems defending your claim that 'everybody dopes', when another obvious doper - and one 'too important to ever go down' - gets busted.
Once again, that isn't my claim.
Plus, where would be the logic in that? That "another obvious doper - and one 'too important to ever go down' - gets busted", proves that not everybody dopes? Really?
panzer dragoon wrote:
Can't remember the last time someone from Norway or the Netherlands was busted...
last year
https://apnews.com/9719a6c454744446915ef7389f57fee9When an African export wins races = proof of African genetic advantage in running.
When an African export gets busted = proof that Europeans dope as much as Africans.
Coevett wrote:
When an African export wins races = proof of African genetic advantage in running.
When an African export gets busted = proof that Europeans dope as much as Africans.
If you were referring to Ghafoor, she was born and raised in Amsterdam
Baltsu wrote:
Coevett wrote:
When an African export wins races = proof of African genetic advantage in running.
When an African export gets busted = proof that Europeans dope as much as Africans.
If you were referring to Ghafoor, she was born and raised in Amsterdam
Don’t bother that dummy with pesky things like “facts”.
Probably not what the OP had in mind but this is a pretty major bust, the 2018 winner of the Rotterdam marathon, 4th in Chicago that same year and 3rd in Boston this year, I give you : Kenneth Kiprop KIPKEMOI
https://www.athleticsintegrity.org/disciplinary-process/provisional-suspensions-in-force
"25/02/2020 Kenneth Kiprop Kipkemoi KEN Presence of Prohibited Substances (Terbutaline) (Article 2.1) Charge Issued"
dodge ball wrote:
Not the OP? wrote:
https://gfycat.com/posheasygoingimago-boobsThat’s a pretty big bust!
That is priceless, potm
Baltsu wrote:
panzer dragoon wrote:
Can't remember the last time someone from Norway or the Netherlands was busted...
last year
https://apnews.com/9719a6c454744446915ef7389f57fee9
No way that is a "she" look at the Adam's Apple!
OP: Is this the one you're talking about?
Kenneth Kiprop Kipkemoi
https://www.athleticsintegrity.org/disciplinary-process/provisional-suspensions-in-force
Chinese Olympic gold medal winning swimmer Sun Yang just got 8 years from CAS for destroying samples with a hammer.
do swimmers count?
Baltsu wrote:
Coevett wrote:
When an African export wins races = proof of African genetic advantage in running.
When an African export gets busted = proof that Europeans dope as much as Africans.
If you were referring to Ghafoor, she was born and raised in Amsterdam
She's still a non-european with a dutch passport.
African champion, Rotterdam winner, 59:11 PR, so no, not elite.
Seriously though, in today's climate, that doesn't really register as a major bust anymore. Sad but true.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/athletics/51671615buckle up wrote:
Wow. I just got a text from a very much “in the know” individual. Brace yourselves. You’re going to be shocked.
The AIU has chosen to channel its resources into targeting elite athletes because the impact of exposing the cheats among them is far greater than with lesser known counterparts.
"We could give you 10 doping cases tomorrow if we wanted to get our stats up," Clothier says. Because doping is rampant among lower-level athletes?
"In some places, yes. But that [catching fringe competitors] is not some great achievement for clean athletics. This means also investigating athletes from developed countries, not least because their motivation to cheat is of a subtly different form: sponsorship deals are far more lucrative in first-world economies.
Interesting. I'll believe it when I see it.
casual obsever wrote:
African champion, Rotterdam winner, 59:11 PR, so no, not elite.
Seriously though, in today's climate, that doesn't really register as a major bust anymore. Sad but true.
59:11 is so slow in the era of the Vaporfly, I'm not sure Rekrunnerbot will be sent by the IAAF to distract us.
It's not just one big bust, it's certainly not Mo, and I think we'll see it by Monday.