Sedjati = obvious EPO cheat: 1:41.46 800

So doping isn't really doping then, even though it's "everywhere"?

Like I said, you don't understand it.

So you can't explain it. As usual.

You are wrong. As usual.

Armstronglivs is like a broken digital clock, always wrong

Recall you said "Track is indistinguishable from tour cycling now. Actually, it was WADA that said that. It lumps running together with bodybuilding and weightlifting, as well as cycling."

This quote from "healthnews" is not a quote from WADA, it does not say "indistinguishable" and it does not lump the four sports together.

They are easily distinguished, not only by number of positives (ranging from 160 to 272), but as I pointed out earlier, total number of samples, and positive test rates.

Algerian got their first International Mathematical Olympiad Gold Medalist (a named
Chams Eddine Abd El Ali Derreche), don't ask me about the "doping" in that field.

Coevett is more expert on the subject and the event happened in his country "England".

Everything that add to North Africa, I'm happy for it.

Coevett is not an expert for doping and also not for Mathematics (his problems here start when counting above 5).

lol the dislikes are very revealing ... the best thing that could happen before the end of the season is a double record 800m/1000m.

Hoady is in bed. If he was online, your comments would be getting 5 or 6 upvotes in under a minute.

None of you can construct an argument. All you are is a bunching of whining noises.

The figures came from WADA. So that isn't WADA? Who is it then? The writer made the same point that I have read in WADA documentation, which is hardly surprising because her point is based on WADA data. As for quotes - I don't collect them just to convince a stupid **** like yourself.

The position that rekrunner cannot bear to face.

"According to 2019 statistics compiled by the WADA, the highest number of anti-doping rule violations (ADRV) by sport were in bodybuilding, athletics (such as track and field), cycling, and weightlifting. Together, these sports comprised more than half of all ADRVs."

A mid 1.41 is like a 3.29. Not sure how you get to that conclusion. And we are not talking high school here, we are talking the best athletes in the world, the best times ever run. So no, the same principle doesn't apply. After watching the 800 m for many years, and the gradual progression of true greats like Kipketer (who spent a season in 1.42s before finally breaching it and moving to low 1.41s), nobody is convincing me that a reasonably good 1.44 athlete is banging out 1.41s regularly the next season without some very strange explanation.

More gradual is more common, but leaps can occur. Kipketer sepnt a season in 1.42s edging better each race and did the same in 1.41s. Big leaps occurring at 25 years of age is dubious. As for Cruz, he is another athlete whose improvement some saw as suspicious.

Spot on, sir. Kicking to a 1.41? It's freakish. I'm really struggling to accept the validity of this run.

Wrong. Legitimate records are good thing, that's all. I don't give a damn about those who watch every 4 years and get excited and have no idea about the sport.

14 pages into this thread, when did it stop being a discussion about Sedjati's suspected doping? Page 2?

The whole thread is hatred against non American or non European runners.