I already know the answer, but do you even read the tweets that you link to? An anonymous source speculated that Hutchison might work for Trump in Florida. Some guy named Sean Davis failed at reading comprehension and decided that means that Hutchison was already planning to go work for Trump. You posted it on the board directly from Twitter without comment. Are you Sean Davis and you are trying to gain followers?
Oh, "adult". Oh, "adult".
You would be embarrassed . . . if you only had a brain.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson weighs in on the Biden administration's response to China's 'colonial interests' and his administration's 'criminalizing of Amer...
Unlike Democrats Veritas does have ethics. So they didn't run the story because they couldn't confirm its authenticity.
Since then it has been validated by the FBI and the Biden's themselves say it's real and was stolen.
If you didn't get all of your news from Democrat Pravda you'd know this.
So you are saying that the excerpt you cited has been validated by the FBI and Biden himself?
I think not.
And even if the excerpt was authentic, it says she is not sure she was abused. But you said, "Joe Biden who is absolutely corrupt and molested his own daughter."
You maliciously accused someone of sexually abusing his daughter. You said it happened with the flimsiest non-evidence anyone could ever dream up. You are disgusting.
Those are her words from her own authenticated diary.
And no Joe obviously hasn't publicly admitted he molested his daughter.
Yeah, and even townhall.com puts the word "false" in quotes because it's not really a false statement.
Seriously, if this is the best the right can do to poke holes in Hutchinson's full testimony, she stands as the most credible witness of all time.
Jesus Christ...
She says things about people that aren't true. The people she's talking about personally refute her claims.
You're embarrassing yourself.
If you're caught lying multiple times or are simply providing "false hearsay" EVERYTHING you say is questionable.
The ONLY reason such a terrible witness is involved at all is because this committee is a sham and they know people like you will never see the truth because you live in a leftist bubble.
These idiots are putting on a circus for people like you and you're lapping it up like a moron without questioning anything.
Quick reminder that, although JRB's approval rating is below 39%, at least for now, DJT's got below 37%--in his first year, in the midst of a booming economy and without a pandemic (and its aftereffects) to deal with.
So, to those who may have been misled: No, Joseph Biden does NOT have the lowest approval ratings of any president ever. That distinction goes to his predecessor.
And of course Biden actually had approval above 50% for several months--something Trump never had for aday.
I suspect all of these are counter to the wishes of the nation. Unbelievable.
this year, the Supreme Court has 1) made abortion illegal 2) made school prayer legal 3) make gun control illegal 4) overturned Miranda rights 5) made it illegal for the EPA to regulate emissions
I already know the answer, but do you even read the tweets that you link to? An anonymous source speculated that Hutchison might work for Trump in Florida. Some guy named Sean Davis failed at reading comprehension and decided that means that Hutchison was already planning to go work for Trump. You posted it on the board directly from Twitter without comment. Are you Sean Davis and you are trying to gain followers?
The source spoke with journalists from Bloomberg. The story is from 2021. There's more reason to believe this Bloomberg story than anything Hutchinson said to the 1/6 committee.
Quick reminder that, although JRB's approval rating is below 39%, at least for now, DJT's got below 37%--in his first year, in the midst of a booming economy and without a pandemic (and its aftereffects) to deal with.
So, to those who may have been misled: No, Joseph Biden does NOT have the lowest approval ratings of any president ever. That distinction goes to his predecessor.
And of course Biden actually had approval above 50% for several months--something Trump never had for aday.
Quick reminder that, although JRB's approval rating is below 39%, at least for now, DJT's got below 37%--in his first year, in the midst of a booming economy and without a pandemic (and its aftereffects) to deal with.
So, to those who may have been misled: No, Joseph Biden does NOT have the lowest approval ratings of any president ever. That distinction goes to his predecessor.
And of course Biden actually had approval above 50% for several months--something Trump never had for aday.
Anyone being honest would consider the fact that 99% of the media was openly trying to destroy Trump 24/7 every day of his presidency so the approval ratings aren't even remotely comparable.
Regardless, Trump bottomed out at 34% after 1/6. Biden will be lower by the time he's done.
I suspect all of these are counter to the wishes of the nation. Unbelievable.
this year, the Supreme Court has 1) made abortion illegal 2) made school prayer legal 3) make gun control illegal 4) overturned Miranda rights 5) made it illegal for the EPA to regulate emissions
Do you even know you're lying?
Abortion was just left to the states. You can still kill your 8 month and 29 day old baby with a hammer if you want to in all of your blue states.
Fun fact: if your argument is sound you don't need to lie.
I suspect all of these are counter to the wishes of the nation. Unbelievable.
this year, the Supreme Court has 1) made abortion illegal 2) made school prayer legal 3) make gun control illegal 4) overturned Miranda rights 5) made it illegal for the EPA to regulate emissions
Do you even know you're lying?
Abortion was just left to the states. You can still kill your 8 month and 29 day old baby with a hammer if you want to in all of your blue states.
Fun fact: if your argument is sound you don't need to lie.
fine, make that correction. The point is that these are all decisions against the will of the people. Probably.
I'm starting to think that given all we're seeing....the Dems *should* ditch the filibuster and make the country at least sort of closer to majority rule.
Let each party do its best. Let the Rs try to merge church and state, outlaw abortion nationally, end same-sex marriage, lower taxes for rich people, eliminate health care for poor people. Let them privatize social security and try to make the planet hotter and dirtier. Let 'em.
THen we get to vote on that. Let the Rs take off their masks and let's see what they are made of. No other country tells a party that controls the legislature and executive branch 'oh no, you can't rule the country as you wish - the minority party can stop you.'
My hunch is that making things clear for once will make the Rs a small regional party, based in the confederacy.
fine, make that correction. The point is that these are all decisions against the will of the people. Probably.
You don't seem to understand the purpose of the Supreme Court.
SCOTUS doesn't make rulings based on people's feelings. The law is what matters. The constitution is what matters.
The "will of the people" has absolutely nothing to do with the Supreme Court.
oh please. There is no absolute truth in most SCOTUS cases. If it were obvious what the law and Constitution said, then a lower court would make the decision and a case would never get to SCOTUS. By the time a case gets to the top court it's almost always a question of opinion, tradition, politics etc.
Why do YOU think SCOTUS has blocks of justices who always vote together? It's because they see the world in the same way and have the same *opinion.* Not that they are better at reading the law or the constitution. They see the world in a similar way.
I'm starting to think that given all we're seeing....the Dems *should* ditch the filibuster and make the country at least sort of closer to majority rule.
Let each party do its best. Let the Rs try to merge church and state, outlaw abortion nationally, end same-sex marriage, lower taxes for rich people, eliminate health care for poor people. Let them privatize social security and try to make the planet hotter and dirtier. Let 'em.
THen we get to vote on that. Let the Rs take off their masks and let's see what they are made of. No other country tells a party that controls the legislature and executive branch 'oh no, you can't rule the country as you wish - the minority party can stop you.'
My hunch is that making things clear for once will make the Rs a small regional party, based in the confederacy.
You're lying again...
No one is trying to "merge church and state".
The SCOTUS ruling on abortion doesn't outlaw abortion. The states that would outlaw abortion outright are full of people who support that. I thought you wanted the "will of the people" to be upheld?
No one is trying to end gay marriage.
Everyone wants lower taxes. Democrats just want to punish ANYONE who's more successful than they are. Most Americans don't think like this.
No one wants to eliminate health care for poor people. They want to fix broken entitlements which take up 60% of the US budget.
Social security is a broken entitlement. Something needs to be done to fix it. Privatization is a better idea than just pretending it isn't a bankrupt Ponzi scheme.
No one is trying to make the planet hotter and dirtier..
There's a reason the generic ballot has shifted in Republicans favor by a huge margin and it isn't because the country agrees with your ignorant list.
You don't seem to understand the purpose of the Supreme Court.
SCOTUS doesn't make rulings based on people's feelings. The law is what matters. The constitution is what matters.
The "will of the people" has absolutely nothing to do with the Supreme Court.
oh please. There is no absolute truth in most SCOTUS cases. If it were obvious what the law and Constitution said, then a lower court would make the decision and a case would never get to SCOTUS. By the time a case gets to the top court it's almost always a question of opinion, tradition, politics etc.
Why do YOU think SCOTUS has blocks of justices who always vote together? It's because they see the world in the same way and have the same *opinion.* Not that they are better at reading the law or the constitution. They see the world in a similar way.
...
They interpret the LAW or the CONSTITUTION.
They don't read opinion polls and make decision based on the will of the people.
So, to those who may have been misled: No, Joseph Biden does NOT have the lowest approval ratings of any president ever. That distinction goes to his predecessor.
note that the prior Republican president, Bush2, had an approval rating in the low 20s by the time he left.
I was certainly wrong, and appreciate the correction! However, according to 538 it was the ELDER George Bush, not the younger, who at one point had a lower rating than Donald Trump ever did. The same is true of Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter.
The fact remains that Biden by no means has the lowest approval ever, bad though it is, and that his lowest rating is still higher than Trump's lowest. So far.
note that the prior Republican president, Bush2, had an approval rating in the low 20s by the time he left.
I was certainly wrong, and appreciate the correction! However, according to 538 it was the ELDER George Bush, not the younger, who at one point had a lower rating than Donald Trump ever did. The same is true of Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter.
The fact remains that Biden by no means has the lowest approval ever, bad though it is, and that his lowest rating is still higher than Trump's lowest. So far.
It's lower than Trump's was at this point in his presidency despite a 24/7 media crusade against Trump.
Even with the media protecting Biden his approval is falling like a stone and will only go lower the economy enters recession.
