How ironic wrote:
i know what you are but what am i?
How ironic wrote:
i know what you are but what am i?
Heitkamp to vote NO on Kavanaugh.
Will there be more Tobins or more Squis for halloween this year?
Libsbians, so does Ford get an Emmy or aNobel or both?
Are you surprised she's voting "no." Not me.
Kavanaugh, Schmavanaugh wrote:
Heitkamp to vote NO on Kavanaugh.
And she just hurt her reelection shot in the very red ND.
Anyone see the update on that 2 door fiasco? Ford allegedly said that it was built because of "Anxiety, phobia and PTSD-like symptoms", but some journalistic investigation seems to suggest that it was built purposely to allow for additional rental residence.
Democrats lose again wrote:
Democrats lose again
These posts are funny because only Republicans can lose in this case.
It was a foregone conclusion that Kavanaugh would be confirmed.
If he isn’t, it’s a big Republican loss.
Brojos- Please Delete this thread it is offenseive on so many levels!!!!!! Has no running content....
The title is offensive and slanderous- RE: Official Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed as a rapist thread
M.A.G.A.
I.B.B.K.
S.O.W.P.
Kavanaugh, Schmavanaugh wrote:
Heitkamp to vote NO on Kavanaugh.
Might as well announce her retirement.
Xxhaha wrote:
Time for the womens to March! Unite and fight! Antifa is coming for all old white men.
Womans
McCaskill is also voting "no." No surprise there. However, she is in a virtual tie for reelection and is risking a loss here. Trump easily won Missouri in 2016.
ND to vote no on Heitkamp wrote:
Kavanaugh, Schmavanaugh wrote:
Heitkamp to vote NO on Kavanaugh.
Might as well announce her retirement.
Yep. She's done.
Not surprised, but I wouldn't have said I was surprised if she was voting YES either. I'm a little surprised she announced without knowing what Flake, Collins, and Murkowski are going to do.
Agingrunner wrote:
Are you surprised she's voting "no." Not me.
Pretty sure McCaskill has been a No for awhile. Think only Manchin is on the fence among Dems.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
McCaskill is also voting "no." No surprise there. However, she is in a virtual tie for reelection and is risking a loss here. Trump easily won Missouri in 2016.
Kavanaugh, Schmavanaugh wrote:
Not surprised, but I wouldn't have said I was surprised if she was voting YES either. I'm a little surprised she announced without knowing what Flake, Collins, and Murkowski are going to do.
Agingrunner wrote:
Are you surprised she's voting "no." Not me.
Agreed. If she voted Yes after Flake, Collins, and Murkowski then no reasonable Democrat would hold it against her since it'd be a forgone conclusion anyways and she'd get to claim to her constituents she voted Yes, thus hopefully retaining her seat.
Translation:. wrote:
Democrats lose again wrote:
Democrats lose again
The women lose again.
Another victory for the old white men.
Identity politics lose again, another victory for due process.
In other news, women across america are bow demanding their husbands build full walk-in closets to cope with PTSD and trauma.
Xxhaha wrote:
Time for the womens to March! Unite and fight! Antifa is coming for all old white men.
Not for me. I created and control Antifa.
You do realize your comments sound very similar to what people in Germany said about the Jews in the 1930's. Only now with the internet, this kind of talk not only is viewed instantly, but world wide. I would suggest you rethink what you and others are suggesting. We do not become a better country by attacking those whose opinions we disagree to and attack, rather than try to understand why someone else might see things from a different perspective. There is no absolute right or wrong, so trying to argue such is a waste of time.