I’ve been studying the vehicle market for years. Fat Hurts is right on everything he says about Tesla.
-
14
-
Oh? wrote:
El Runkin wrote:
Well, maybe you need to learn to quit sticking your beak into conversations you know nothing about, before you symbolically throw your hands up in frustration. That's called passive-aggressive behavior.
What are you talking about?
Recap:
I responded to a post that addressed two different discussions. I specifically said I was going to skip the other conversation and talk about the one I thought was worth discussing.
In response, you said that "skipping is the same as condoning".
I pointed out how that is not true, skipping a conversation is NOT condoning. Then, since you seemed so needing of my opinion to have brought that up, I reluctantly gave my opinion on the topic I didn't want to bother discussing.
You then respond to my post talking about NOTHING that I said and rather ranting more on the subject I didn't want to bother discussing in the first place.
And now you're wanting to lecture me about "sticking my beak into conversations you know nothing about, before you symbolically throw your hands up in frustration"?? It's not passive-aggressive behavior to TRY AND AVOID A CONVERSATION THAT YOU DON'T DEEM TO BE WORTH HAVING, and then when you're being dragged into the conversation pointing out that the person who is dragging you into the conversation isn't bothering to even address what little you bothered to say on the topic and just continued to rant about what they wanted to rant about.
I'll say it again: if you want to rant about something, that's fine, but you don't need to include me in on it. Hope you feel better now that you've gotten that off your chest, but next time don't try to needlessly drag me into it especially if you're not going to engage with what I say. Stop trolling and just rant if that's what you really want to do, the rest of us can just leave you to it in peace.
For a guy trying to avoid a conversation, you sure seem to be engaging in it.
Notably, your self-styled alleged "Recap" makes no mention of the fact that Boebert's husband (Jayson) not only dropped his pants in a bowling alley, but he did it while intoxicated and while Boebert was at the crime scene. What the hell was she thinking? "Oh yeah, this is the guy for me." Jesus Christ. She sees some creep walking around with his drawers around his ankles and think "better scoop him up before some other bowling chick with a passion for lewd public behavior gets a hold of him." Good grief.
23 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
StoPre wrote:
Reported - a personal attack.
I encourage others to reports this sort of behavior also.
Cry more.
No one cries more tears than you every single day.
You really do lead the tears for Trump whining 😭😭😭😭
25 -
El Runkin wrote:
Oh? wrote:
What are you talking about?
Recap:
I responded to a post that addressed two different discussions. I specifically said I was going to skip the other conversation and talk about the one I thought was worth discussing.
In response, you said that "skipping is the same as condoning".
I pointed out how that is not true, skipping a conversation is NOT condoning. Then, since you seemed so needing of my opinion to have brought that up, I reluctantly gave my opinion on the topic I didn't want to bother discussing.
You then respond to my post talking about NOTHING that I said and rather ranting more on the subject I didn't want to bother discussing in the first place.
And now you're wanting to lecture me about "sticking my beak into conversations you know nothing about, before you symbolically throw your hands up in frustration"?? It's not passive-aggressive behavior to TRY AND AVOID A CONVERSATION THAT YOU DON'T DEEM TO BE WORTH HAVING, and then when you're being dragged into the conversation pointing out that the person who is dragging you into the conversation isn't bothering to even address what little you bothered to say on the topic and just continued to rant about what they wanted to rant about.
I'll say it again: if you want to rant about something, that's fine, but you don't need to include me in on it. Hope you feel better now that you've gotten that off your chest, but next time don't try to needlessly drag me into it especially if you're not going to engage with what I say. Stop trolling and just rant if that's what you really want to do, the rest of us can just leave you to it in peace.
For a guy trying to avoid a conversation, you sure seem to be engaging in it.
Notably, your self-styled alleged "Recap" makes no mention of the fact that Boebert's husband (Jayson) not only dropped his pants in a bowling alley, but he did it while intoxicated and while Boebert was at the crime scene. What the hell was she thinking? "Oh yeah, this is the guy for me." Jesus Christ. She sees some creep walking around with his drawers around his ankles and think "better scoop him up before some other bowling chick with a passion for lewd public behavior gets a hold of him." Good grief.
I made one post on the topic, after your initial statement that "skipping (the conversation) is condoning" that you have yet to bother addressing. The rest of my replies to you have been about how stupid it is to think that someone trying to avoiding a conversation needs to participate in a conversation in order for you to rant about something they don't see the value in talking about.
Congrats, though, I'll never bother responding to anything from your username again (too bad Letsrun doesn't just let you ignore posts from a user that hasn't registered their name). Have fun with your obsessing over and trolling about the genitals of the spouse of a congresswoman.
00 -
H amb o wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Is that all you've got?
You said that Tesla 💩🥪 wouldn't be making cars in 20 years. Why won't you tell us the reason behind your brilliant analysis?
Not only my analysis. But I’ll be right too. 📀📀📀📀📀😂😂😂😂
Translation: Maybe if I Google hard enough I can find someone else who is crazy enough to think Tesla won't be making cars in 20 years.
01 -
Fat hurts wrote:
H amb o wrote:
Not only my analysis. But I’ll be right too. 📀📀📀📀📀😂😂😂😂
Translation: Maybe if I Google hard enough I can find someone else who is crazy enough to think Tesla won't be making cars in 20 years.
There’s at least one other guy who thinks so too. He is the CEO, so what does he know. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
21 -
If you voted for Biden, you are an idiot. There is no other reason. 👎👎👎
Of the many crises America faces, the most serious one sits in the Oval Office.
We have a president who doesn’t even pretend to be working night and day to beat back inflation, save the economy from a recession or tackle rampant crime and growing political violence. He looks to be on automatic pilot when the nation desperately needs strong leadership.
Yet the morning after the interview, Biden displayed his version of Alfred E. Neuman’s “What, me worry?” attitude and left the White House for another four-day trip home to Delaware. As he stopped to answer a question from reporters about gas prices, which had just hit a record national average of $5 a gallon, First Lady Jill Biden cut him off, saying, “We gotta go!” and off they went.
Through May, the president spent 188 full or partial days away from the White House, according to the Washington Examiner, which said he was on a pace to spend 553 days away over a full term.42 -
if you voted for Biden, you are an idiot. There is no other reason.
72 -
^^^^^^
He f**ked up your head that’s for sure 😏
14 -
And STILL President of the United States wrote:
^^^^^^
He f**ked up your head that’s for sure 😏
^
He f**cked up your 401K that’s for sure. 😏
42 -
So everything and anything that is bad in the US is Biden's fault, correct? And all of those bad things are easily fixed if he would just pay attention to them? He has total control over all of it, correct? He can just press a button or something?
Just checking.
25 -
H amb o wrote:
And STILL President of the United States wrote:
^^^^^^
He f**ked up your head that’s for sure 😏
^
He f**cked up your 401K that’s for sure. 😏
Wrong, try again 😏
14 -
Libs sure are swell people. 👎👎👎👎
11 -
just checking??? wrote:
So everything and anything that is bad in the US is Biden's fault, correct? And all of those bad things are easily fixed if he would just pay attention to them? He has total control over all of it, correct? He can just press a button or something?
Just checking.
42 -
#24257
This post was removed.
-
He never takes responsibility for any of his f**k ups either.
Lets go Brandon!
#FJB
42 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
I've done a Biden on my bike before, but I had clips on. He just plain lost his balance
33 -
Bad Wigins wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
I've done a Biden on my bike before, but I had clips on. He just plain lost his balance
Look at the video again. His left foot was already on the ground and then he tipped over. He's too weak, has a fried brain and is going to need a wheelchair soon.
42
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.