Buster of lying trolls wrote:
What's so unambiguous? It's all there.
The MRO and LRO are similar technology, and so the images of Insight on Mars and the images of Apollo equipment and tracks on the Moon are similar resolution.
You could equally say it was Elvis' cadillac.
I was in high school at the time and watched the launch, landing, and return on television, along with millions of others around the world. Here are my questions for the hoaxers:
Millions of people watched the launch on live television and thousands more were actually there in FL to witness the event in person. Were the astronauts actually in the capsule or did we launch an unmanned rocket?
Where did the rocket go after it was launched? Did it actually go to the moon but no one really landed? Did it just go around the earth for 4 days and then return, or did we just send it into space? Surely the Soviets and others were monitoring the flight closely and would have known if the rocket never went to the moon, or were they in on the hoax as well? They would have every incentive to expose the fraud.
Were all of the people we saw on television at mission control during the launch and moon landing actors, or just NASA employees playing along?
Millions of people watched the capsule splashdown and the astronauts emerge on live television. Was this all staged as well? It obviously was not filmed in a studio so they would have needed a ship and crew to be in on it as well as the networks broadcasting all of the events, including the moon landing.
All of the moon hoaxers are focusing on the science, but that is an unwinnable argument. I would like them to explain why out of the hundreds or even thousands involved in the coverup no one has ever come forward. Surely someone could have made a lot of money for the story if they could provide credible evidence of a hoax, as well as done a great public service to expose what would have been essentially a great misuse of public funds and the public trust.
What about members of Congress and other top elected officials. Were they aware that the funds were being misappropriated for this hoax, or were they all in on it as well? Not a single elected official of the opposition party, or investigative reporter was willing or able to expose the fraud?
To the moron wrote:
Buster of lying trolls wrote:
What's so unambiguous? It's all there.
The MRO and LRO are similar technology, and so the images of Insight on Mars and the images of Apollo equipment and tracks on the Moon are similar resolution.
You could equally say it was Elvis' cadillac.
Because it's not. Because the LM, tracks, ALSEP equipment, LRV, etc. All correspond to what the astronauts did up there.
Look... If NASA faked all the original Apollo photos from 1969 - 1972, why wouldn't they just fake the LRO photos with sufficient detail to make all you conspiracy idiots shut the F up? Why post ambiguous fake photos? So effing stupid!
Recent posts here in this thread...
Conspiracy guy: look at this Mars lander photo. How come there's no pictures like it of the Apollo landers?
Anti conspiracy guy: Here's some similar photos of Apollo landing sites.
Conspiracy guy:. I don't like those photos.
old and naive wrote:
I was in high school at the time and watched the launch, landing, and return on television, along with millions of others around the world. Here are my questions for the hoaxers:
Millions of people watched the launch on live television and thousands more were actually there in FL to witness the event in person. Were the astronauts actually in the capsule or did we launch an unmanned rocket?
Where did the rocket go after it was launched? Did it actually go to the moon but no one really landed? Did it just go around the earth for 4 days and then return, or did we just send it into space? Surely the Soviets and others were monitoring the flight closely and would have known if the rocket never went to the moon, or were they in on the hoax as well? They would have every incentive to expose the fraud.
Were all of the people we saw on television at mission control during the launch and moon landing actors, or just NASA employees playing along?
Millions of people watched the capsule splashdown and the astronauts emerge on live television. Was this all staged as well? It obviously was not filmed in a studio so they would have needed a ship and crew to be in on it as well as the networks broadcasting all of the events, including the moon landing.
All of the moon hoaxers are focusing on the science, but that is an unwinnable argument. I would like them to explain why out of the hundreds or even thousands involved in the coverup no one has ever come forward. Surely someone could have made a lot of money for the story if they could provide credible evidence of a hoax, as well as done a great public service to expose what would have been essentially a great misuse of public funds and the public trust.
What about members of Congress and other top elected officials. Were they aware that the funds were being misappropriated for this hoax, or were they all in on it as well? Not a single elected official of the opposition party, or investigative reporter was willing or able to expose the fraud?
There is a video which I posted on a prior thread that pretty much shows NASA caught lying. It shows the actornauts hammering a post into the moon's surface. You hear the hammer clanging against the post. Impossible in a vacuum. Also the radio communication was instantaneous- when a 3 sec delay is required. The laws of physics violated again. NASA then realized their errors and corrected those descrepancies much later and in subsequent videos.
OneGiantLie
Legit question wrote:
There is a video which I posted on a prior thread that pretty much shows NASA caught lying. It shows the actornauts hammering a post into the moon's surface. You hear the hammer clanging against the post. Impossible in a vacuum. Also the radio communication was instantaneous- when a 3 sec delay is required. The laws of physics violated again. NASA then realized their errors and corrected those descrepancies much later and in subsequent videos.
OneGiantLie
I'm not interest in debating those details. I want to know what happened to the rocket that was launched to go to the moon. Were the astronauts on it? Where did it go? Did anyone in Congress know that the millions that were allocated to the Apollo program was actually used to perpetuate a gigantic hoax on the American public?
Buster of lying trolls wrote:
To the moron wrote:
You could equally say it was Elvis' cadillac.
Because it's not. Because the LM, tracks, ALSEP equipment, LRV, etc. All correspond to what the astronauts did up there.
Look... If NASA faked all the original Apollo photos from 1969 - 1972, why wouldn't they just fake the LRO photos with sufficient detail to make all you conspiracy idiots shut the F up? Why post ambiguous fake photos? So effing stupid!
So if you asked someone what those grainy old black and white images were depicting, they would say that they resembled a moon lander? Of course they would!
old and naive wrote:
Legit question wrote:
There is a video which I posted on a prior thread that pretty much shows NASA caught lying. It shows the actornauts hammering a post into the moon's surface. You hear the hammer clanging against the post. Impossible in a vacuum. Also the radio communication was instantaneous- when a 3 sec delay is required. The laws of physics violated again. NASA then realized their errors and corrected those descrepancies much later and in subsequent videos.
OneGiantLie
I'm not interest in debating those details. I want to know what happened to the rocket that was launched to go to the moon. Were the astronauts on it? Where did it go? Did anyone in Congress know that the millions that were allocated to the Apollo program was actually used to perpetuate a gigantic hoax on the American public?
It is only necessary to impute a single discrepancy in order to dispute a fact. Thereafter, the statement that the Apollo landings actually occurred is a theory based on assumption.
old and naive wrote:
Legit question wrote:
There is a video which I posted on a prior thread that pretty much shows NASA caught lying. It shows the actornauts hammering a post into the moon's surface. You hear the hammer clanging against the post. Impossible in a vacuum. Also the radio communication was instantaneous- when a 3 sec delay is required. The laws of physics violated again. NASA then realized their errors and corrected those descrepancies much later and in subsequent videos.
OneGiantLie
I'm not interest in debating those details. I want to know what happened to the rocket that was launched to go to the moon. Were the astronauts on it? Where did it go? Did anyone in Congress know that the millions that were allocated to the Apollo program was actually used to perpetuate a gigantic hoax on the American public?
In other words, you have no counter-argument. No matter how many holes are found in the narrative, you continue to cling to blind faith in NASA. Your critical thinking has never been engaged.
Under the moron wrote:
It is only necessary to impute a single discrepancy in order to dispute a fact. Thereafter, the statement that the Apollo landings actually occurred is a theory based on assumption.
I never stated the moon landing was a fact. But it is indisputably a fact that an Apollo rocked was launched on July 16, 1969. I have some very basic questions: Were astronauts in the capsule, and where did the rocket go? You seem to be the expert on this.
old and naive wrote:
Under the moron wrote:
It is only necessary to impute a single discrepancy in order to dispute a fact. Thereafter, the statement that the Apollo landings actually occurred is a theory based on assumption.
I never stated the moon landing was a fact. But it is indisputably a fact that an Apollo rocked was launched on July 16, 1969. I have some very basic questions: Were astronauts in the capsule, and where did the rocket go? You seem to be the expert on this.
It would great if a NASA "expert" could answer all of our questions.
Legit doesn't think the Rocket took off, because then the astronauts would have seen his flat Earth.
Not only does Legit not believe NASA, he doesn't believe Eratosthenes, Copernicus, or Galileo. Somehow the whole world has been lying to us throughout the millennia, but Legit knows the real truth.
Legit question wrote:
old and naive wrote:
I'm not interest in debating those details. I want to know what happened to the rocket that was launched to go to the moon. Were the astronauts on it? Where did it go? Did anyone in Congress know that the millions that were allocated to the Apollo program was actually used to perpetuate a gigantic hoax on the American public?
In other words, you have no counter-argument. No matter how many holes are found in the narrative, you continue to cling to blind faith in NASA. Your critical thinking has never been engaged.
...says the guy who continued to ole away from the third party confirmation evidence presented. You are doing exactly what you are accusing that poster of by avoiding his questions, haha.
old and naive wrote:
Under the moron wrote:
It is only necessary to impute a single discrepancy in order to dispute a fact. Thereafter, the statement that the Apollo landings actually occurred is a theory based on assumption.
I never stated the moon landing was a fact. But it is indisputably a fact that an Apollo rocked was launched on July 16, 1969. I have some very basic questions: Were astronauts in the capsule, and where did the rocket go? You seem to be the expert on this.
I never disputed that Saturn V rockets were built and launched. I have no knowledge where the actornauts were located, but they NEVER went to the moon. No doubt that parts of the rocket were recovered off the FL coast by the US Navy.
Been around the world wrote:
Legit doesn't think the Rocket took off, because then the astronauts would have seen his flat Earth.
Not only does Legit not believe NASA, he doesn't believe Eratosthenes, Copernicus, or Galileo. Somehow the whole world has been lying to us throughout the millennia, but Legit knows the real truth.
Wrong. I said the rockets were launched. Try again.
Legit question wrote:
old and naive wrote:
I'm not interest in debating those details. I want to know what happened to the rocket that was launched to go to the moon. Were the astronauts on it? Where did it go? Did anyone in Congress know that the millions that were allocated to the Apollo program was actually used to perpetuate a gigantic hoax on the American public?
In other words, you have no counter-argument. No matter how many holes are found in the narrative, you continue to cling to blind faith in NASA. Your critical thinking has never been engaged.
I don't have blind faith in NASA. But I'm more interested in how the coverup occurred. For example, the networks that broadcast the landing would have known that it was not a live feed. Did they have a tape from NASA? Did they willingly go along with this knowing that millions of their viewers were being deceived?
And you haven't answered my question about who was on the rocket and where it went. Oh, and were the Soviets part of this coverup?
old and naive wrote:
Legit question wrote:
In other words, you have no counter-argument. No matter how many holes are found in the narrative, you continue to cling to blind faith in NASA. Your critical thinking has never been engaged.
I don't have blind faith in NASA. But I'm more interested in how the coverup occurred. For example, the networks that broadcast the landing would have known that it was not a live feed. Did they have a tape from NASA? Did they willingly go along with this knowing that millions of their viewers were being deceived?
And you haven't answered my question about who was on the rocket and where it went. Oh, and were the Soviets part of this coverup?
Again, I said i didnt know where the actornauts were located. The discarded rocket stages landed in the Atlantic Ocean- and likely recovered by the US Navy.
Was there ever a TV monitor that showed the Apollo astronauts at Cape Canaveral riding inside the elevator and then entering the rocket? Just curious. Maybe there is a video on youtube. Haven't checked yet.
A bunch of guys on here would have trouble taking a selfie of Theiranus, never mind a picture of any other planet.