It's settled. Harambe agrees with me that Djokovic is the GOAT. Not surprising though. Only one player has a resume like this:
Most Slam quarterfinals Most Slam semifinals Most Slam finals Most Slam titles Most Slam wins Most Master 1000 semifinals Most Master 1000 finals Most Master 1000 titles Most Master 1000 wins
A goat needs no defense. Yet you copy and paste daily. Telling
I'll have you know that I personally type in each Djokovic achievement for every post. Its my way of honoring Djokovic's outstanding, unparalleled accomplishments. Simply copying and pasting them would disrespect the GOAT's unrivaled tennis record.
I'm open to entertain any challenges to Djoker being the GOAT. However, until someone puts forth a contender, we all agree that Djokovic is the GOAT. If anyone can rival the achievements below that have been dutifully re-typed from my voluminous Djoker Achievements spreadsheet, I'm all ears.
Most Slam quarterfinals Most Slam semifinals Most Slam finals Most Slam titles Most Slam wins Most Master 1000 semifinals Most Master 1000 finals Most Master 1000 titles Most Master 1000 wins
I already said I’m not going to dance for you monkey. The often used quote that is wrongly attributed to Twain seems apropos when dealing with a creature like yourself.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and the beat you with experience”
I, OTOH, love to mingle with the hoi polloi like Harambe. Keeps me grounded.
True or false? A GOAT needs no defense?
True or False? You won't post anyone other than Djokovic as the GOAT.
Most Slam quarterfinals Most Slam semifinals Most Slam finals Most Slam titles Most Slam wins Most Master 1000 semifinals Most Master 1000 finals Most Master 1000 titles Most Master 1000 wins
I, OTOH, love to mingle with the hoi polloi like Harambe. Keeps me grounded.
True or false? A GOAT needs no defense?
False. See never-ending arguments about Montana vs. Brady, Jordan vs. LeBron, etc., etc.
Even if Djokovic had won a few more majors, a calendar year grand slam one of the years he had three wins and a final, or whatever, people would say he wasn't the GOAT because they don't like his style, they don't like that he refused to take the Covid vaccine, they started out liking Federer or Nadal and they'll never let their favorite go, they're of an older generation and think Laver or Sampras will always be greater or Borg coulda shoulda woulda been, they think the different surfaces play too similarly now so his calendar Slam near misses don't mean as much, etc., etc., ad nauseum.
"True or False? My dissertation needs no defense." lol
Your dissertation was on subjective opinions about athletes?
There's your problem. You think Djokovic being the GOAT is subjective. It's not. It's been settled. At this point, its a completely objective, factual statement. Can YOU name someone greater than Djoker?
Now some GOAT conversations can be subjective since there's no clear cut GOAT - basketball, football, baseball, for example. But tennis now is like hockey. The GOAT conversation is purely objective since there's a clear GOAT. Of course, you'll have some fringe wackos try to say that Gretzky or Djokovic aren't the GOAT, but that's akin to saying the Earth is flat. Sure, people say the Earth is flat, but merely saying it doesn't change the truth.
And only a fool would say that there is a GOAT other than the guy with this resume?
Most Slam quarterfinals Most Slam semifinals Most Slam finals Most Slam titles Most Slam wins Most Master 1000 semifinals Most Master 1000 finals Most Master 1000 titles Most Master 1000 wins
False. See never-ending arguments about Montana vs. Brady, Jordan vs. LeBron, etc., etc.
Even if Djokovic had won a few more majors, a calendar year grand slam one of the years he had three wins and a final, or whatever, people would say he wasn't the GOAT because they don't like his style, they don't like that he refused to take the Covid vaccine, they started out liking Federer or Nadal and they'll never let their favorite go, they're of an older generation and think Laver or Sampras will always be greater or Borg coulda shoulda woulda been, they think the different surfaces play too similarly now so his calendar Slam near misses don't mean as much, etc., etc., ad nauseum.
A goat needs no defense. There isn’t a certain goat for any of those debates.
People frantically argue that Chokervic is the goat when all they’re doing is reducing the certainty each time. They win for me.
Example: Gretzky hasn’t come up once. No defense needed.
This post was edited 27 seconds after it was posted.
Your dissertation was on subjective opinions about athletes?
There's your problem. You think Djokovic being the GOAT is subjective. It's not. It's been settled. At this point, its a completely objective, factual statement. Can YOU name someone greater than Djoker?
Now some GOAT conversations can be subjective since there's no clear cut GOAT - basketball, football, baseball, for example. But tennis now is like hockey. The GOAT conversation is purely objective since there's a clear GOAT. Of course, you'll have some fringe wackos try to say that Gretzky or Djokovic aren't the GOAT, but that's akin to saying the Earth is flat. Sure, people say the Earth is flat, but merely saying it doesn't change the truth.
And only a fool would say that there is a GOAT other than the guy with this resume?
Most Slam quarterfinals Most Slam semifinals Most Slam finals Most Slam titles Most Slam wins Most Master 1000 semifinals Most Master 1000 finals Most Master 1000 titles Most Master 1000 wins
A goat needs no defense.
Every time you post you affirm that the debate is still open. You strengthen my case.
I told you guys… Harambe just loves the sound of his own voice. That’s all this is. It’s a pathology. It’s sad. Thankfully, nobody save for two people listens to him, and certainly not on “settled science” or sports.
There's your problem. You think Djokovic being the GOAT is subjective. It's not. It's been settled. At this point, its a completely objective, factual statement. Can YOU name someone greater than Djoker?
Now some GOAT conversations can be subjective since there's no clear cut GOAT - basketball, football, baseball, for example. But tennis now is like hockey. The GOAT conversation is purely objective since there's a clear GOAT. Of course, you'll have some fringe wackos try to say that Gretzky or Djokovic aren't the GOAT, but that's akin to saying the Earth is flat. Sure, people say the Earth is flat, but merely saying it doesn't change the truth.
And only a fool would say that there is a GOAT other than the guy with this resume?
Most Slam quarterfinals Most Slam semifinals Most Slam finals Most Slam titles Most Slam wins Most Master 1000 semifinals Most Master 1000 finals Most Master 1000 titles Most Master 1000 wins
A goat needs no defense.
Every time you post you affirm that the debate is still open. You strengthen my case.
Finally! I welcome your debate on another player being the GOAT. However, every time you post and can't name a challenger to Djoker's GOATness, it proves the objective nature of the GOAT debate (or, rather, the lack of debate).
Every time you post you affirm that the debate is still open. You strengthen my case.
Finally! I welcome your debate on another player being the GOAT. However, every time you post and can't name a challenger to Djoker's GOATness, it proves the objective nature of the GOAT debate (or, rather, the lack of debate).
A goat needs no defense. Another defense from you reveals the devastating truth
I told you guys… Harambe just loves the sound of his own voice. That’s all this is. It’s a pathology. It’s sad. Thankfully, nobody save for two people listens to him, and certainly not on “settled science” or sports.
I’m merely debating my opinion on a message board. What’s wrong with that? Are you anti free speech?