This would be a start. wrote:
50 pages of - I guess - fascinating words combinations since the wrote:
...I have a naive question.
None needs the FBI investigation conclusion to tell that he did lie under oath. That's obvious.
It seems anecdotal to you, so I'm just wondering what kind of exposure would render the confirmation of BK unacceptable to you and your rep buddies?
Convincing evidence that he committed the assault.
So the lies are ok? Just don't have anyone witness the attempted rape, but lying is perfectly ok. Guess if it's good for Donnie, Donnie jr., Flynn, Manafort, Sanders, Conway, Jarred, Ivanka and Melania, then it's good for everybody!! Imagine what happens when some poor minority takes an oath in the courtroom and uses this tactic.