Lia Thomas exposed 'male genitalia' in women's locker room after meet

Here is the solution wrote:

Free market frank wrote:

There was a no legal definition of a woman

And yet Dems have long thought it the height of bigotry (with no other possible explanation) that the U.S. has not had a woman President. Yet how can they possibly know for sure? Under their lack of being able to define what a “woman” is, perhaps we’ve already had one, or several. Who could say with 100% certainty? Maybe Michelle was in fact the man of the family, and Barack his blushing bride. Since men can give birth now (or so we’re being told), that wouldn’t preclude Michelle from being the one present in the delivery room upon the birth of their two daughters (if I may be so bold as to potentially misgender the two “girls.”)

Here is the solution wrote:

Free market frank wrote:

There was a no legal definition of a woman

And yet Dems have long thought it the height of bigotry (with no other possible explanation) that the U.S. has not had a woman President. Yet how can they possibly know for sure? Under their lack of being able to define what a “woman” is, perhaps we’ve already had one, or several. Who could say with 100% certainty? Maybe Michelle was in fact the man of the family, and Barack his blushing bride. Since men can give birth now (or so we’re being told), that wouldn’t preclude Michelle from being the one present in the delivery room upon the birth of their two daughters (if I may be so bold as to potentially misgender the two “girls.”)

kuku wrote:

OFOOS wrote:

"Innocent until proven guilty" is not the issue here. Men should not be in women's bathrooms or changing rooms. I was arguing against the idea that transwomen are inherently not exhibitionists. Sounds like Lia is, actually. Or at least doesn't have the decency to use a separate changing area.

Then you are the very definition of a transphobe, so why are we even talking?

I’ve not seen anything to the effect of Lia being an exhibitionist, but in case that were true, I’d chalk that up to an isolated bad apple, not representative of transwomen.

Koonery wrote:

Somebody’s racism is showing.

Koonery wrote:

Here is the solution wrote:

And yet Dems have long thought it the height of bigotry (with no other possible explanation) that the U.S. has not had a woman President. Yet how can they possibly know for sure? Under their lack of being able to define what a “woman” is, perhaps we’ve already had one, or several. Who could say with 100% certainty? Maybe Michelle was in fact the man of the family, and Barack his blushing bride. Since men can give birth now (or so we’re being told), that wouldn’t preclude Michelle from being the one present in the delivery room upon the birth of their two daughters (if I may be so bold as to potentially misgender the two “girls.”)

Somebody’s racism is showing.

OFOOS wrote:

kuku wrote:

Then you are the very definition of a transphobe, so why are we even talking?

I’ve not seen anything to the effect of Lia being an exhibitionist, but in case that were true, I’d chalk that up to an isolated bad apple, not representative of transwomen.

You put it in bold, but you didn't read it. I was arguing against the idea that transwomen are inherently not exhibitionists. In other words, they could be exhibitionists or not, it depends on the person. And in my book, a man getting naked in a room full of women, at least some of whom surely are not comfortable with him being there, is an exhibitionist.

How am I the very definition of a transphobe if I am arguing that transwomen might or might not have a certain characteristic?

Here is the solution wrote:

Koonery wrote:

Somebody’s racism is showing.

I’m black.

”Poof” goes your theory.

Koonery wrote:

Here is the solution wrote:

I’m black.

”Poof” goes your theory.

You are not smart enough to engage here. You can hate your own race. You are a racist.

Koonery wrote:

Here is the solution wrote:

I’m black.

”Poof” goes your theory.

You are not smart enough to engage here. You can hate your own race. You are a racist.

Here is the solution wrote:

Koonery wrote:

You are not smart enough to engage here. You can hate your own race. You are a racist.

Who’s the racist? Look in the mirror, buddy.

Koonery wrote:

Here is the solution wrote:

I’m black.

”Poof” goes your theory.

You are not smart enough to engage here. You can hate your own race. You are a racist.

kuku wrote:

OFOOS wrote:

You put it in bold, but you didn't read it. I was arguing against the idea that transwomen are inherently not exhibitionists. In other words, they could be exhibitionists or not, it depends on the person. And in my book, a man getting naked in a room full of women, at least some of whom surely are not comfortable with him being there, is an exhibitionist.

How am I the very definition of a transphobe if I am arguing that transwomen might or might not have a certain characteristic?

How about we don’t know if black people are inherently criminal and unintelligent, so we should segregate them? I assume you don’t think it’s racist?

Your “book” doesn’t apply coz we are talking women getting naked, not men.

Here is the solution wrote:

Koonery wrote:

You are not smart enough to engage here. You can hate your own race. You are a racist.

Furthermore, your saying that me not falling for the pandering of the Dems means I hate my race is as offensive as Dementia Joe declaring that, “If you don’t vote for me, then you aren’t black!” (Talk about racism!)

arrest wrote:

Koonery wrote:

You are not smart enough to engage here. You can hate your own race. You are a racist.

and just when you think the thread can't get any more entertaining (scary), in comes Koonery! Wow, just wow! What an entrance! Koonery do you know Frank and Kuku?

back up bigger issue here wrote:

Gay people exist too, so even in same sex locker rooms there could be the attraction problem.

OFOOS wrote:

back up bigger issue here wrote:

Gay people exist too, so even in same sex locker rooms there could be the attraction problem.

Attraction, yes, but there is a power difference between men and women that is not present in same-sex locker rooms.