Meanwhile, just when you thought no one could be dumber than Karen or agip, the Biden administration swoops in with an idea even 3rd graders could tell you is idiotic.
$3,500,000,000 American tax dollars will be flushed down the toilet to do the work of 9 trees that they could have picked up at Home Depot for $300.
Hate to bother replying to "Adult", but it's his first try at bringing facts to the forum in a while, so let's see how he did.
1) Quote shown states, "The EXACT definition of a perpetual motion machine." Actually, the technology here as absolutely nothing to do with perpetual motion machines. Nothing.
2) "Adult" writes "$3,500,000,000 American tax dollars will be flushed down the toilet to do the work of 9 trees". Actually, 9 trees will take about 400 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere per year, on average. The ORCA (currently operating CO2 removal machine) removes about 8,000,000 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere per year. The reader can be the judge as to whether 400 = 8,000,000.
If you are as intelligent as a 3rd grader you would be able to figure out that it would only take around 164,000 small trees to remove 8,000,000 pounds of CO2 per year.
At $3.5 BILLION that's only a little over $21k PER TREE.
You think you've made a point and it's HILARIOUS that you don't understand why you're wrong.
It didn't have to be this way but with all the late night ballot stuffing, mules, mail in voter fraud, etc. we ended up with a dementia patient residing in the WH.
Environmental activists are currently working to change a controversial provision in Maryland’s Clean Energy Jobs Act of 2019 which includes trash incineration as part of the state’s renewable portfolio standards. The law, pa...
It didn't have to be this way but with all the late night ballot stuffing, mules, mail in voter fraud, etc. we ended up with a dementia patient residing in the WH.
This is exactly the problem with the Democrat media. Whether they are lying intentionally or just absolutely incompetent they continually produce stories like this which are blatantly false and stupid people just believe it without question.
Hate to bother replying to "Adult", but it's his first try at bringing facts to the forum in a while, so let's see how he did.
1) Quote shown states, "The EXACT definition of a perpetual motion machine." Actually, the technology here as absolutely nothing to do with perpetual motion machines. Nothing.
2) "Adult" writes "$3,500,000,000 American tax dollars will be flushed down the toilet to do the work of 9 trees". Actually, 9 trees will take about 400 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere per year, on average. The ORCA (currently operating CO2 removal machine) removes about 8,000,000 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere per year. The reader can be the judge as to whether 400 = 8,000,000.
It takes a special level of stupid to fact check hyperbole in defense of spending $3.5 BILLION to do the work of trees... LOL!
Ah yes, the old, "Anyone who points out that 'Adult' is lying must be stupid" defense.
Hate to bother replying to "Adult", but it's his first try at bringing facts to the forum in a while, so let's see how he did.
1) Quote shown states, "The EXACT definition of a perpetual motion machine." Actually, the technology here as absolutely nothing to do with perpetual motion machines. Nothing.
2) "Adult" writes "$3,500,000,000 American tax dollars will be flushed down the toilet to do the work of 9 trees". Actually, 9 trees will take about 400 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere per year, on average. The ORCA (currently operating CO2 removal machine) removes about 8,000,000 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere per year. The reader can be the judge as to whether 400 = 8,000,000.
If you are as intelligent as a 3rd grader you would be able to figure out that it would only take around 164,000 small trees to remove 8,000,000 pounds of CO2 per year.
At $3.5 BILLION that's only a little over $21k PER TREE.
You think you've made a point and it's HILARIOUS that you don't understand why you're wrong.
OK, let's see if you can pass the 3rd grader test. Here are a few facts that are a bit, shall we say, inconvenient for you. Let's see if you can comprehend them.
1) The ORCA did not cost $3.5 billion. It cost less than 0.5% of that figure. Thus, your $21k per tree figure is absolutely, completely, and in every conceivable way, WRONG.
2) The ORCA is first generation technology. The $3.5 billion is to advance the technology so that future carbon scrubbing machines will be even more efficient.
3) Trees have this nasty habit of returning all of their CO2 into the atmosphere in fairly short order. Unless you believe in unicorns and fairies, you really shouldn't believe that the overall carbon stored in the forests of American is likely to be going up in any substantial way in the near future.
Conclusion: You did NOT pass the 3rd grade exam. Not even close.
Now do please try to get past kindergarten so that some day, in the distant future, you may indeed graduate into the 3rd grade.
If you are as intelligent as a 3rd grader you would be able to figure out that it would only take around 164,000 small trees to remove 8,000,000 pounds of CO2 per year.
At $3.5 BILLION that's only a little over $21k PER TREE.
You think you've made a point and it's HILARIOUS that you don't understand why you're wrong.
OK, let's see if you can pass the 3rd grader test. Here are a few facts that are a bit, shall we say, inconvenient for you. Let's see if you can comprehend them.
1) The ORCA did not cost $3.5 billion. It cost less than 0.5% of that figure. Thus, your $21k per tree figure is absolutely, completely, and in every conceivable way, WRONG.
2) The ORCA is first generation technology. The $3.5 billion is to advance the technology so that future carbon scrubbing machines will be even more efficient.
3) Trees have this nasty habit of returning all of their CO2 into the atmosphere in fairly short order. Unless you believe in unicorns and fairies, you really shouldn't believe that the overall carbon stored in the forests of American is likely to be going up in any substantial way in the near future.
Conclusion: You did NOT pass the 3rd grade exam. Not even close.
Now do please try to get past kindergarten so that some day, in the distant future, you may indeed graduate into the 3rd grade.
Always quick to double down on stupid.... lol!
It costs ORCA like $600 to remove 1 ton of CO2 from the air.
The UN estimates that 10 BILLION tons of CO2 need to removed from the air to make a difference assuming the hilariously ridiculous Paris Climate goals are met.
They won't be met.. But even if they were put your little 4th grader brain to work and see if you can figure out how many ORCA plants the world will need to accomplish nothing....
OK, let's see if you can pass the 3rd grader test. Here are a few facts that are a bit, shall we say, inconvenient for you. Let's see if you can comprehend them.
1) The ORCA did not cost $3.5 billion. It cost less than 0.5% of that figure. Thus, your $21k per tree figure is absolutely, completely, and in every conceivable way, WRONG.
2) The ORCA is first generation technology. The $3.5 billion is to advance the technology so that future carbon scrubbing machines will be even more efficient.
3) Trees have this nasty habit of returning all of their CO2 into the atmosphere in fairly short order. Unless you believe in unicorns and fairies, you really shouldn't believe that the overall carbon stored in the forests of American is likely to be going up in any substantial way in the near future.
Conclusion: You did NOT pass the 3rd grade exam. Not even close.
Now do please try to get past kindergarten so that some day, in the distant future, you may indeed graduate into the 3rd grade.
Always quick to double down on stupid.... lol!
It costs ORCA like $600 to remove 1 ton of CO2 from the air.
The UN estimates that 10 BILLION tons of CO2 need to removed from the air to make a difference assuming the hilariously ridiculous Paris Climate goals are met.
They won't be met.. But even if they were put your little 4th grader brain to work and see if you can figure out how many ORCA plants the world will need to accomplish nothing....
I see that you have conceded every single point. Good job!
You may be ready for 1st grade sooner that some may think!
It costs ORCA like $600 to remove 1 ton of CO2 from the air.
The UN estimates that 10 BILLION tons of CO2 need to removed from the air to make a difference assuming the hilariously ridiculous Paris Climate goals are met.
They won't be met.. But even if they were put your little 4th grader brain to work and see if you can figure out how many ORCA plants the world will need to accomplish nothing....
I see that you have conceded every single point. Good job!
You may be ready for 1st grade sooner that some may think!
It will cost $6 TRILLION per year to remove LESS carbon that CHINA ALONE is pumping into the atmosphere.
You need to spend less time congratulating yourself and more time trying to actually understand the topics...
Even if enough useless factories are built to remove those 10 billion tons of CO2 it will make ZERO difference to global warming or sea levels.
