actually I'm kludging together two slightly different episodes. Apologies.
but fact is, russia stole Democratic Party emails and coordinated with the trump campaign in order to release them at the best time for Trump.
at a separate time, trump asked them to steal and release HRC's missing emails. And immediately afterwards, they did try to steal the missing emails. Not clear if they got them.
at the end of it all, trump said he'd do it again. Accept help from putin to get elected. the same putin who invaded Ukraine.
The best time wouldn't have been at the convention... You lie so much you're confused...
It's very clear they didn't get Hillary's e-mails.
Putin didn't help Trump get elected you moron...
hah. The best time.
the russians released the stolen emails right after the access hollywood tape when trump bragged about his er actions with women and how much they liked being groped.
the same day, they released them. In order to push trump's latest scandal off the front page.
but nah no coordination. Nah.
trumpers dealing with putin to get elected. the same putin who invaded ukraine and who we are spending billions to fight.
Many U.S. officials and cyber security experts in and out of government are convinced that state-sponsored Russian hackers are the ones who stole 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Committee and leaked them to the public just in time to disrupt the Democrats’ national convention in Philadelphia.
No one cares about the DNC e-mails.
As always, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about... lol.
They can't even prove Russians hacked the DNC let alone that Trump was involved. It's more likely that the Sanders people were involved than Trump since the DNC stole the nomination from them.
Hillary's e-mails have never been released. Those are the e-mails Trump asked Russia to find.
The crowds chanting “lock her up” did.
Trump did NOT lock her up, he conned them and you.
Fat Hurts is way off the mark on the 90% will be EVs by 2030. I mean WAAAAYYY off the mark. Just to look at one area - 1/3 of people live in apartments. Having sufficient charging stations in apartment complexes is not happening anytime soon. There is not room for them, you will have tenants fighting over the stations, going to be very hard to have enough of the stations.
As always, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about... lol.
They can't even prove Russians hacked the DNC let alone that Trump was involved. It's more likely that the Sanders people were involved than Trump since the DNC stole the nomination from them.
Hillary's e-mails have never been released. Those are the e-mails Trump asked Russia to find.
The crowds chanting “lock her up” did.
Trump did NOT lock her up, he conned them and you.
Fat Hurts is way off the mark on the 90% will be EVs by 2030. I mean WAAAAYYY off the mark. Just to look at one area - 1/3 of people live in apartments. Having sufficient charging stations in apartment complexes is not happening anytime soon. There is not room for them, you will have tenants fighting over the stations, going to be very hard to have enough of the stations.
He also says the economy is doing great. The kid is absolutely delusional. Apparently they'll let anyone use the prison library computer these days.
Tell that to every one who chanted “lock her up” - Trump played you for a fool.
You have no idea why they want her locked up because you're an ignorant clown. It's been 6 years and you still have absolutely no idea what Hillary did.... You're a fool.
The people who get paid to know about this don't agree with you. If you're such an EV genius why does everyone in the world who isn't a greenie wacko in the 10th grade think you're wrong?
If the transition to EVs happens too fast, the legacy automakers go out of business. Those auto executives are not planning to make the switch that fast, so they are reporting about their own plans.
But the pure EV makers are going to continue taking more market share from the makers of gas guzzlers.
The 60% growth is very impressive. The total US sales for EVs in Q1 2022 was over 208,000. If you just assume total sales for the year at 4x that you get 832,000 for all of 2022. At 60% growth, we would hit 100% of all US sales in 2027 or 2028.
The people who get paid to know about this don't agree with you. If you're such an EV genius why does everyone in the world who isn't a greenie wacko in the 10th grade think you're wrong?
If the transition to EVs happens too fast, the legacy automakers go out of business. Those auto executives are not planning to make the switch that fast, so they are reporting about their own plans.
But the pure EV makers are going to continue taking more market share from the makers of gas guzzlers.
The 60% growth is very impressive. The total US sales for EVs in Q1 2022 was over 208,000. If you just assume total sales for the year at 4x that you get 832,000 for all of 2022. At 60% growth, we would hit 100% of all US sales in 2027 or 2028.
Fat Hurts, to follow up what I touched on before. 1/3 of people driving cars live in apartments. You are saying 90% of cars sold will be EVs. No. 1 - the people living in apartments - 1/3 of car drivers - like NONE are able to pay $70,000 for an EV now. So that takes your 90% down to 67% MAX. We have so many other issues that we begin at 67% and work downwards. And it ain't pretty.
The people who get paid to know about this don't agree with you. If you're such an EV genius why does everyone in the world who isn't a greenie wacko in the 10th grade think you're wrong?
If the transition to EVs happens too fast, the legacy automakers go out of business. Those auto executives are not planning to make the switch that fast, so they are reporting about their own plans.
But the pure EV makers are going to continue taking more market share from the makers of gas guzzlers.
The 60% growth is very impressive. The total US sales for EVs in Q1 2022 was over 208,000. If you just assume total sales for the year at 4x that you get 832,000 for all of 2022. At 60% growth, we would hit 100% of all US sales in 2027 or 2028.
You think like a child.
Demand is a thing. You can't wish the country to wanting 100% EV's.
If the transition to EVs happens too fast, the legacy automakers go out of business. Those auto executives are not planning to make the switch that fast, so they are reporting about their own plans.
But the pure EV makers are going to continue taking more market share from the makers of gas guzzlers.
The 60% growth is very impressive. The total US sales for EVs in Q1 2022 was over 208,000. If you just assume total sales for the year at 4x that you get 832,000 for all of 2022. At 60% growth, we would hit 100% of all US sales in 2027 or 2028.
You think like a child.
Demand is a thing. You can't wish the country to wanting 100% EV's.
It is embarrassing what he is insisting ... that 90% of the cars by 2030 will be EVs. Just embarrassing. How many Americans can even afford a $60,000 car? I would say 85% can't afford a $60,000 or even higher. But he keeps saying 90% of Americans will be driving EVs in a few years. It is comical.
Indeed! If that were to continue, the US would get to 100% by the end of next year. By Q4, 2030, there would be 50 EVs sold in the US for every man, woman and child on the planet in that quarter alone.
Gonna take a wild guess and say that 60% Q on Q growth is not sustainable.
If the transition to EVs happens too fast, the legacy automakers go out of business. Those auto executives are not planning to make the switch that fast, so they are reporting about their own plans.
But the pure EV makers are going to continue taking more market share from the makers of gas guzzlers.
The 60% growth is very impressive. The total US sales for EVs in Q1 2022 was over 208,000. If you just assume total sales for the year at 4x that you get 832,000 for all of 2022. At 60% growth, we would hit 100% of all US sales in 2027 or 2028.
Fat Hurts, to follow up what I touched on before. 1/3 of people driving cars live in apartments. You are saying 90% of cars sold will be EVs. No. 1 - the people living in apartments - 1/3 of car drivers - like NONE are able to pay $70,000 for an EV now. So that takes your 90% down to 67% MAX. We have so many other issues that we begin at 67% and work downwards. And it ain't pretty.
EVs don't cost $70,000. You can up a new one for under 30K. Used ones go for even less. And that's today. In 2030, the price will go even lower as economies of scale kick in.
Apartments will start to offer charging as an amenity. Many already do. Installing chargers is cheap and easy. There is plenty of time between now and 2030 to see the changes happen. And they will.
If gas prices stay this high, sales of gas-powered cars will continue to plummet. What we see now is that people are willing to put in an order and wait for over a year to get an EV. So we could continue to see overall car sales decline steeply while sales of EVs go up as fast as they can make them.
Demand is a thing. You can't wish the country to wanting 100% EV's.
It is embarrassing what he is insisting ... that 90% of the cars by 2030 will be EVs. Just embarrassing. How many Americans can even afford a $60,000 car? I would say 85% can't afford a $60,000 or even higher. But he keeps saying 90% of Americans will be driving EVs in a few years. It is comical.
He's a little kid. He thinks since half the people in his little leftist suck hole already have EV's the rest of the country must be similarly situated. He's got no idea what the real world looks like.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.
Fill out a review to be entered into a drawing to win a free pair of shoes.