Ross Tucker has produced the tweet of the year. An epic TAKE DOWN of transactivists trying to gain access to women's sports.

Then your example is irrelevant.

Nobody's against athletes having genetic advantages, it's whether those advantages are fair or not - i.e. is it an advantage the rest of the competitors are able to have given the parameters of the competition itself. We've decided to divide athletes by age, sex, weight, experience, etc. in order to even the playing field as much as possible for everybody. After that, genetics and the amount of work and time put in are what we allow to separate athletes. So if your advantage is based on something not allowed by the competition rules (like doping or not being the right sex), then it's unfair.

You just schooled the guy who thought he was doing the schooling. Nice job! School’s in session, Hanka! Pay attention and you might be able to scrape through with a 2.0!

Life is not fair Johnny. So you are saying that advantages derived from genetics are not a problem in terms of the fairness of the competition. Except of course they are, at least to the intelligent. So for instance, it is not fair that some have extraordinary talent and others don’t. This is not fair at all. So please do not insult the intelligence of some of us by predicating this on some nebulous concept of fairness. Is it fair that some of us are extraordinarily intelligent? No it is not. This is not about fairness because there is no fairness.

It is fair otherwise why would people say it’s about who works the hardest?

They say it but it doesn’t make it true.

I'm liberal, it doesn't bother me if people want to identify as another gender, or what they choose to wear etc...but don't use that to compete aginst biologically different, physically inferior in a performance way, females.

Don't...you are cheating yourself, you are cheating them and preventing others from achieving a higher place. You are not prohibited from all sports, it is a lie to say that.

You should stop claiming to be more intelligent than others. You keep proving the reverse.

This is advice you should be giving yourself. You are an incoherent windbag.

So it appears you still can't tell the difference between fair and unfair advantages.

There is nobody alive who is smart enough to tell the difference.

Yeah, it’s about as bad as the quintessential LR simp logic of “just because I feel like a chair doesn’t make me a chair”, but there white knight on here love being transphobic to the point of idiocy.

You assure me there my estimation of you is correct. Your arguments show you don't understand what you are talking about. You can't tell the difference between advantage - which is always present in sports - and unfair advantage - which sports try to remove.

We know you aren't smart enough. You insist on proving it again and again.

There is nobody alive who can tell you. Is it fair that I am smarter than you? Nobody can answer that. Obviously I eviscerate you in debate but there may be concomitant disadvantages such as the difficulty of finding equals or the psychic pain which can accompany elevated insight. This you have been spared.

I fear you are only expert in self-evisceration. You cannot tell the difference between unequal - which is integral to sports - and unfair, which sports are against. In sports, equality and fairness are not the same. Losers are never equal to winners, but if winners shouldn't have been in that competition by virtue of age, weight or sex - or they doped or otherwise cheated - then they didn't win fairly. But you are incapable of grasping that. You prove that you are really not a very intelligent bear.

So you have posted those stories of Lupron compromising the patients' physical abilities including the ability to play sports.

Is this effect only limited to natal females who take this medicine? Or does the same negative effect happen to natal males? If not, why?

If it also happens to natal males, then what happen to their ability to play sports? Do they still have advantage over natal females in spite of this side effect? If that's what you are suggesting, how that can be proved?

What exactly are you trying to claim regarding this medicine's impact on one's ability to play sports?

Seen a fair few unintelligent arguments, but this ranks right up there.

How is being better than others in your biological group unfair. We don't all have the same IQ either, not the same sport skills, personality etc. None of that form the basis of our sporting divisions. If you don't like the divisions the way they are then go and form your own sporting bodies and do what you want. Why do you guys want to change everything to suit your needs/

F off

I am not trying to change anything. You don’t have the requisite intellectual horsepower for this discussion. Do you consider this to be a fair or unfair disadvantage? Answer very carefully sweetheart. You are not equipped to engage at this level. I happen to think it is an unfair advantage which I possess in relation to primitive minds such as yours. You see it is not so clear what is fair or unfair is it sweetheart? With your limited mind you don’t even see how unfair an advantage I possess over you. Or is it fair? You cannot answer sweetheart.

The dropout thinks he schooled anyone. How cute. Not in the way that means I like you.

Size and source of advantage both matter. Consider where we currently make divisions for fairness -- sex, age, weight, disability. Sports sometimes divide based on other things, but those are a few of the most common ones.

I'd be comfortable betting a few bucks that my actual IQ is higher than your pretend one, but that doesn't matter. You don't need to be a genius for this discussion. I don't see you applying your mind, though, just throwing out a lot of vague assertions and running from concrete reality -- you know, the thing that shows that Superfreak doesn't happen, while math, applied to human biology, shows that Superfreak can't happen. Think not? Let me know when someone runs 23:33.