perfect wrote:
zzzz wrote:
So you think that things must be a hell for runners where most dogs are off leash? You just know where you run then, because it's not true for where I live. It's actually better. Dogs that have always been on leash are defensive, don't know how to get out of the way without being pulled in by owners, etc. Leashes are necessary for those dogs that are overly aggressive, not good with other people or other dogs, but those owners already know that if they are on the trails. Dogs that are running off leash with runners and cyclists just go by others, without a command needed because that's what they are use to doing. I've run a ton of mileage for the past 20 years where I live and not been attacked by the often dozens of off leash dogs I see every day.
Other things that are regional: There's mountain biking/hiker/equestrian animosity in Bay Area of CA, with those with more power blocking use of bikes on a lot of popular trails. I'd call those hikers/equestrians uptight too. But several thousand miles away, where I live, it's inconceivable that those user groups would be against each other.
lol, don't tell me you're a biker too? haha, fan of off-leash dogs and a biker.....explains a lot.
Kind of, not really. I was a road cyclist from junior high to college, but mostly a runner since the '90s. I rode my mountain bike once a week last summer.
You didn't address my point. If off leash dogs are such a problem everywhere, how come I can run 2 hours a day for the past 20 years and not get attacked when I often pass a dozen off leash dogs, sometimes more, per run? It's a regional thing.