MarathonInvestigation.com Got SHUT DOWN!

The site is indeed back up but it is running like a potatoes in molasses.

A DUI is far worse than cheating in a race, but it won't generate national attention. After 7-10 years it won't show up in a background check and there is also the possibility of having it expunged from the records. Seo's story will be available online forever.

We can only hope.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

A DUI is far worse than cheating in a race, but it won't generate national attention. After 7-10 years it won't show up in a background check and there is also the possibility of having it expunged from the records. Seo's story will be available online forever.

Actually, lots of police mugshots stay on the internet forever due to sites reporting on arrests.

You should start DUI Investigations.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

A DUI is far worse than cheating in a race, but it won't generate national attention. After 7-10 years it won't show up in a background check and there is also the possibility of having it expunged from the records. Seo's story will be available online forever.

A serial DUI might generate national attention.

A person who tries to create internet fame based on their driving skills and try to attract sponsorship for their instagram fame might attract national attention if they get a DUI.

A random nobody who gets one DUI wont attract national attention.

The marathon cheaters are the same way. If somebody cheated their way into a marathon finish in an average time and just posted one or two social media pictures of them with their finisher medal, they're probably going to get away with it. If somebody cheats repeatedly, makes tons of posts extolling their prowess as a runner, gathers lots of attention, they're probably going to be exposed and publically humiliated.

Forever is also how long it takes these people to apologize, come clean, and try to make it right by all the people they’ve cheated & lied to.

What an awful woman. Copied bibs for dozens of races. It’s theft. Why can’t she just be arrested and tasered.

I wish my high school teachers had looked like her. thicc!

Gravy wrote:

I wish my high school teachers had looked like her. thicc!

What would you have done? You were probably a socially awkward runner who couldn't hold a conversation without mentioning something about running 5x, let alone have any chance with a woman.

+1

Drainthefecesswamp wrote:

If somebody cheats repeatedly, makes tons of posts extolling their prowess as a runner, gathers lots of attention, they're probably going to be exposed and publically humiliated.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Anyway, Facebook is what her students and others see (so no pics on the MI site is no big deal), they're certainly getting stuck in to her on FB, and it's not just her who's defrauded the race and taken money away from good causes it's also the forged bib wearers.

Gravy wrote:

I wish my high school teachers had looked like her. thicc!

+1 what a super hot body! Again too bad she’s not too bright

You are of course correct but you won’t find a lot of support for that opinion here. The cheater threads are full of dark people who want to see the demise of the cheaters’ lives for as long as they live.

Don’t worry, they don’t have to go online whenever they start any actual running.

the grand inquisitor wrote:

You are of course correct but you won’t find a lot of support for that opinion here. The cheater threads are full of dark people who want to see the demise of the cheaters’ lives for as long as they live.

Actually, I believe in giving cheaters 2nd and 3rd chances. Makes it more funny if they come back, cheat, and then get caught yet again.

Sure, but who would organize this race for cheaters?

Not a Lawyer wrote:

Unfortunately there really aren't any teeth in the DCMA for punishing those who file false claims.

The DMCA was designed to preserve a law made obsolete by digital technology.

The whole point of copyright is to protect the investment of a publisher so they can't be undercut by others. When it costs nothing to publish, there's no investment to protect. The world has changed and certain professions refuse to change with it, expecting they should get money for nothing.

Granted it may still cost money to produce a professional photo, film or book. But it costs nothing to publish it digitally. It's on the producers to find a more realistic way to market it.

Frivolous DMCA claims should be punishable.

Its obvious that the liberals are behind this. Collusion?

Not sure which part of the Jane Seo piece was better. The bike ride or doubler buying the hi-def race pic to get the watch details.