Not Kiprop wrote:
I doubt the testers wrote:
Not really,but almost. So I give you a + 1 for that. But that the testers would have taken bribes is not admitted and confirmed. The testers rule violation is more that to tell in advance a test would take place. The small money that was told Kiprop gave to the testers was according to firsthand info from Kiprop that the testers asked for a sample fee. I think much point to that Kiprop will be a free man again. It has now been a year and some months since the samples were taken. Should not logically take that long time to end the case if it was a clear case. And how did the EPO get into the samples?
How EPO got in the sample? Think like you are the bad guy. What would you do? Of course plant EPO into the sample. Just the same way guns and or drugs are planted on innocent victims by police. Kiprop's case is very difficult to handle and the only thing is to let him free. The money(fee) he gave to the sample takers was not in cash(and that was a clever strategy by Kiprop) and that is why neither Iaaf nor WADA nor even the sample takers themselves have denied it. Of course it would be stupid to admit it but at the same time the SILENCE is a solid confirmation the claim has substance and that they are cornered. Whether the sample takers asked for the money or not may never be known but the fact that there was a transaction of a financial nature between Kiprop and the sample takers at the time of sample taking, is suspect enough and any judge unless a corrupt one, would acquit Kiprop and reinstate him to competition with immediate effect. In fact WADA may be asked to compensate Kiprop for lost income during all this time he has not been able to compete.
A good one! And I think Kiprop can get a huge indemnity for his name being dragged in the dirt. Of course it will be difficult for him to make a comeback but I hope he will.