Doubtful wrote:
Coevett wrote:
Best testing system in the world, and in the last year one minor league sprinter and one minor league female javelin thrower.
Kenya -worst testing system in the world, and in the last eight weeks two Olympic champions and two Commonwealth medalists (all runners).
Sorry to bring logic into this.
Britain - advanced doping techniques and masking agents, easy access to labs and doctors.
Kenya - access to drugs, but limited ability to finely microdose and mask.
You can’t establish system efficiency by the number of catches. If I catch 5 mice with one set of traps and 10 mice with another, which system is superior? Is the first one better because there are less mice found in the building? Or is the second one better because there are more mice caught? Or is the second one worse because there are more mice found in the building? Or is the first one worse because there are less mice caught?
THANK YOU! This is exactly the point I’ve been trying to get across here for years. The Kenyan “mice” will all eventually be caught. British “mice” (or ‘snakes’, if you prefer) are, on the other hand, far more adept at evading traps and laying low long enough for people to start believing there are no ? on the British isles because the Lord in Monaco banished them St Patrick style.